Another MK1GT3 gone
Another MK1GT3 gone
Author
Discussion

Dan7357

Original Poster:

2,648 posts

239 months

laird

26,140 posts

245 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Coming to a Porsche Dealer/Specialist near you...

Vixpy1

42,699 posts

295 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
laird said:
Coming to a Porsche Dealer/Specialist near you...
laugh

Slippydiff

16,483 posts

254 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
laird said:
Coming to a Porsche Dealer/Specialist near you...
I somehow doubt it, it's Cat B, and thus the shell (and chassis number/identity) will have to be destroyed.

fioran0

2,410 posts

203 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Is this the car that the owner was on here after it asking about repair options while he was waiting to hear the official insurance line?

_gez_

1,013 posts

225 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Sounds very much like it.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Edit to add: If it is the same car then in the original topic the OP stated there was a hole in the sump. The ebay ad says the engine still fires and 'runs sweet'. yikes

Edited by _gez_ on Monday 7th November 22:15


Edited by _gez_ on Monday 7th November 22:16

jeremyc

28,356 posts

315 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
_gez_ said:
Sounds very much like it.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Edit to add: If it is the same car then in the original topic the OP stated there was a hole in the sump. The ebay ad says the engine still fires and 'runs sweet'. yikes
nonoThe one in that thread is a 2003 Mk2.

This is a 1999 Mk1. frown

laird

26,140 posts

245 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
I somehow doubt it, it's Cat B, and thus the shell (and chassis number/identity) will have to be destroyed.
laugh

There are a few on here who may well disagree with you! That car will come back, one way or another.

fioran0

2,410 posts

203 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
More worrying there's no sump on those engines. Just the crank case.
I wonder what was holed then. Maybe just the tank came loose, maybe it's got a new crank ventilation upgrade

_gez_

1,013 posts

225 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
jeremyc said:
_gez_ said:
Sounds very much like it.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Edit to add: If it is the same car then in the original topic the OP stated there was a hole in the sump. The ebay ad says the engine still fires and 'runs sweet'. yikes
nonoThe one in that thread is a 2003 Mk2.

This is a 1999 Mk1. frown
So it is - plain to see in black in white. paperbag Can't GT3 drivers drive or something? (like I can't read) wink

Slippydiff

16,483 posts

254 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
laird said:
laugh

There are a few on here who may well disagree with you! That car will come back, one way or another.

Those that want to can disagree until they're blue in the face. As a Cat B car it will NOT find it's way back onto the road, the shell and it's identity HAS to be destroyed. No if's no buts. smile

laird

26,140 posts

245 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:

Those that want to can disagree until they're blue in the face. As a Cat B car it will NOT find it's way back onto the road, the shell and it's identity HAS to be destroyed. No if's no buts. smile
In theory yes. In practice?

I won't bore you with the details. It's been done to death on here. Suffice to say, I'm far from alone.

screwloose

608 posts

236 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:

Those that want to can disagree until they're blue in the face. As a Cat B car it will NOT find it's way back onto the road, the shell and it's identity HAS to be destroyed. No if's no buts. smile
Wake up fella rolleyes

Barry Ashcroft

1,958 posts

252 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Where on the ad does it state that the car is CatB........

Steve Rance

5,453 posts

262 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Classic 911 rear end impact. What a sad end for such a lovely car

daveyb662

1,722 posts

196 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Out of interest...why is rear end impact classic of the 911?

ScienceTeacher

408 posts

216 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all

widow maker

64 posts

182 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
will be interesting to see how much it goes for as the insurance company sold it for peanuts dont ask me how i know but i do and the impact was a tree after a little spin

Zp

16,158 posts

220 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Barry Ashcroft said:
Where on the ad does it state that the car is CatB........
I think the fact that the chassis has been compromised says it itself.

When my Exige was hit, before it was even inspected I knew it would be a Cat B as the chassis had a big tear in it.

Anyway, I love this little gem in the 'Description'... Used: An item that has been previously used. The item may have some signs of cosmetic wear, ...

Zp

16,158 posts

220 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
widow maker said:
will be interesting to see how much it goes for as the insurance company sold it for peanuts dont ask me how i know but i do and the impact was a tree after a little spin
To give an idea, my Exige (see above) that cost me £35k just 5 weeks earlier, sold as a Cat B for just under £3k.