Poor 911 RIP

[Gary11]

"Porsche 911 found dead in Malibu Hills
The fire has only left the basic shell of the iconic sports car after it consumed pretty much everything else, such as the tires, seats, and the rest of the interior.The only good part about this is that the 911 has a beautiful final resting place overlooking the scenic Malibu Hills. "

[DH01]

Great picture

[marky911]

^^ Yep,



Any story with it? I know I'm heading for a "Yep, caught fire and burnt to a crisp."

I just wondered why it was never removed or what have you...

[tom felty]

great pic sad

[mollytherocker]

I dont think that is sad at all.

I cant explain why though.

MTR

[nurburgring1]

mollytherocker said:

I dont think that is sad at all.

I cant explain why though.

MTR

Heartless, some people are just so hard.;)

[FrankCayman]

http://www.carbuzz.com/news/2012/2/28/Porsche-911-...

[mollytherocker]

Its still less rusty than an 80's Alfa.

MTR

[VonSenger]

But can any of you sado beardies tell what it is and the year? Obviously sporting fuchs so could possibly be an SC of some sort. Any other takers? Theres a virtual beer in it for the first sado to tell us what it is and why.

[mollytherocker]

I'm going with 3.2. The headlamp surrounds are larger.

MTR

[melv]

Great picture!!

[VonSenger]

mollytherocker said:

I'm going with 3.2. The headlamp surrounds are larger.

MTR

Thats a good start. was there a significant difference?

[mollytherocker]

VonSenger said:

mollytherocker said:

I'm going with 3.2. The headlamp surrounds are larger.

MTR

Thats a good start. was there a significant difference?

The SC had a smaller surround, the 3.2 is about twice as deep?

Having said that, the later 204bhp SC may have had the deeper ones?

MTR

[VonSenger]

MTR goes to get history of porsche from his shelf.

[madala]

FrankCayman said:

http://www.carbuzz.com/news/2012/2/28/Porsche-911-...

....what a terrific set of photos.....sad....but somehow uplifting.....sorry....I can't explain more.

[Gary11]

mollytherocker said:

The SC had a smaller surround, the 3.2 is about twice as deep?

Having said that, the later 204bhp SC may have had the deeper ones?

MTR

ROW cars had these and similar bezels,different to UK ones across range iirc.

[nurburgring1]

mollytherocker said:

VonSenger said:

mollytherocker said:

I'm going with 3.2. The headlamp surrounds are larger.

MTR

Thats a good start. was there a significant difference?

The SC had a smaller surround, the 3.2 is about twice as deep?

Having said that, the later 204bhp SC may have had the deeper ones?

MTR

Those are just US surrounds. Our's were the same from 74-94 if my memory serves me correctly.

[VonSenger]

Lol, i love this site.

[roadsterz4]

Lets have a moment of silence.

[deadslow]

mollytherocker said:

Its still less rusty than an 80's Alfa.

MTR

and looks to be just as reliable