This really need a new top end??
This really need a new top end??
Author
Discussion

bridey0

Original Poster:

2,961 posts

215 months

Bill Stein

1,595 posts

239 months

Tuesday 13th March 2012
quotequote all
bridey0 said:
How can anyone know that ?

kusee pee

1,021 posts

233 months

Tuesday 13th March 2012
quotequote all
It didn't drive very well when I test drove it a couple of years ago. Not very urgent plus suspected third gear syncro. Maybe it's been fixed since then...

bridey0

Original Poster:

2,961 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th March 2012
quotequote all
kusee pee said:
It didn't drive very well when I test drove it a couple of years ago. Not very urgent plus suspected third gear syncro. Maybe it's been fixed since then...
Ah gotcha

MrCooke

796 posts

225 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
Compression results are usually in PSI, not %. I guess % could be the percentage of what the original compression would be, but that would be a very odd way of doing it.

The more useful test would be a leakdown test and this does give a % result. If those are for a leakdown test they are thoroughly decent for a 90k mile engine and most folk wouldn't suggest the losses to be high enough to warrant a rebuild, but the test needs to be combined with other observations and checks to be sure.

As well as a leaky top end there are loads of other things to worry about on Turbos, especially little used ones. You can easily spend thousands on the fuel injection system alone.

If the 3rd gear synchro is iffy a gearbox rebuild is usually 'only' £1000 - £2000.

Get it properly inspected, £20k can go in the blink of an eye if it's ropey.