Boxster Spyder Warranty
Boxster Spyder Warranty
Author
Discussion

2010spy

Original Poster:

1,916 posts

194 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
My Spyder is almost two years old. Just had first service and brake fluid change (£500). Also had the 111 point check - no problems. I have extended the warranty for two years (£1,320). I have 14 days to change mind on Porsche Warranty - just wondered if anyone else has done this or used alternative warranty providers. At £660 per annum, it seemed 'reasonable' - but just wanted views (i.e. is the Porsche Warranty any good or do they try to wriggle out of everything). Car only done 4k so not used heavily. Any thoughts much appreciated.

Ady128

537 posts

173 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
Don't change your mind-keep the warranty. When I had my 1st Boxster some years ago I did the same and wondered the same. The Porsche club members said don't bother. I wrote to Quentin Willson at The Sunday Mirror and he said they were worth their weight in gold. I bought the warranty. The car had it's 1st service and the OPC informed me it needed a new gearbox. It had only done 14k miles and I couldn't tell. But what would a new gearbox have cost? Plus you get the breakdown cover. A no-brainer in my opinion.

Zyp

16,105 posts

219 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
Can I ask why you didn't take the 3rd year warranty when new?

(Assuming you bought the car new?)

P40L VX

157 posts

245 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
I'll always keep/extend the OEM warranty. My CR has warranty to 2015 and if I am keeping the car afterwards will renew it then.

My last last car was a E93 M3. The 4.0 engine popped just out of warranty and caused me months of pain and frustration not to mention the loss of ££. It was a harsh lesson after thinking, its a BMW, they never go wrong and people saying, extended warranties, they aren't worth it.

2010spy

Original Poster:

1,916 posts

194 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
Hi, I didn't take the third year warranty at the time because they wanted about £800 from memory and I did not know if I would have the car that long. Also, because I had the 111 point check as part of the first service, they did not charge this time. hence, it made sense to defer the decision on the warranty - if that makes sense.

Also, in response to the BMW point, I also had a BMW that needed a new ECU and 'Warranty Direct' were not wanting to pay for that (when they explained their myriad small print exclusions).

Gouldian

88 posts

175 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
Ady - Warranties are always a vexed question, but if your car had only done 14,000m. and the gearbox problem was discovered at the first service, surely it would have been covered by the 2 year original warranty in any event.
My then new 986 "S" warranty expired 10 years ago, and had I taken out a further warranty to cover the intervening years up to now, it would have cost about £8000. The car has run faultlessly with no replacement parts other than tyres and an annual service. Always a tricky decision, and lady luck can be cruel!

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

244 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
If it were me then if we are talking about a PDK car I would warranty it (OPC) and if it were not, money in the bank and see where it goes. The hesitancy over PDK is simply because it is an unknown that if a systemic issue did emerge with would cost a lot of cash to resolve. Once you are through about 6 years after it was launched I reckon that you could take a more pragmatic view on it. I have a pretty high degree of confidence in the rest of the expensive bits for the 987.2 that I am unconvinced that long term you will recoup the warranty costs (assuming that you will keep it for a while, which you should because the Spyder is a damn fine car).

DS240

5,736 posts

248 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
I didn't take 3rd year option on the cayman s and haven't bothered with the spyder.

Had an Elise with no warranty and nothing went wrong with that either.

It's a roll of the dice, but with favourable odds on my normal, low mileage use.

HokumPokum

2,089 posts

235 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
not taking warranty. With low mileage use, the probability adjusted value of warranty drops substantially. and the spyder has less to go wrong anyway.


Ady128

537 posts

173 months

Friday 16th November 2012
quotequote all
Gouldian said:
Ady - Warranties are always a vexed question, but if your car had only done 14,000m. and the gearbox problem was discovered at the first service, surely it would have been covered by the 2 year original warranty in any event.
My then new 986 "S" warranty expired 10 years ago, and had I taken out a further warranty to cover the intervening years up to now, it would have cost about £8000. The car has run faultlessly with no replacement parts other than tyres and an annual service. Always a tricky decision, and lady luck can be cruel!
It was back in 2006 and if I remember correctly the 1st service took place just after 2 years and I think I'd already bought the warranty, but you're right; it's just like any insurance.

HokumPokum

2,089 posts

235 months

Saturday 17th November 2012
quotequote all
simples. do the probability adjusted math. unless the binary failure outcome is financially ruinous for you, you should always reject extended warranties. If it is, then pay for the warranty

2010spy

Original Poster:

1,916 posts

194 months

Saturday 17th November 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for replies - I will probably keep for peace of mind. Although, given that I only do 2,000 miles per year, I am very tempted not to bother.