Gen2 997 - bore scoring
Gen2 997 - bore scoring
Author
Discussion

AlexH997

Original Poster:

265 posts

161 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
Hi all

Does anyone know if the Gen 2 997 suffers from bore scoring?

I'm assuming the IMS problem has gone due to a change in design.

I've seen a nice Gen2 Targa 4S for sale but for the same money I could get a Turbo and not worry about those problems. Problem is that I like the glass roof.

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
There is a least one case detailed in a thread on here - do a search and it should turn up.

Edited to add: here it is, sadly not immune : http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Edited by drmark on Saturday 20th July 10:17

AlexH997

Original Poster:

265 posts

161 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
Thanks I did do a search but didn't come across this thread, the ones I saw was full of conjecture and no real world it's happened to me.

So if bore scoring is supposed to be caused by lack of cooling then gen 2 still have the same problems...or it has nothing to do with cooling.

Gibbo205

3,572 posts

236 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
Gen2 is vastly improved. But if neglected or abused then I'm sure they an still suffer.

Magic919

14,504 posts

230 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
One of mine needed a new engine and another guy on here as Flashgordon seemed to be going through the same process.

The failure itself didn't match up the Gen 1 problems and it is nowhere near as widespread. It would be foolish to try to explain the cause, but we may find out eventually when Indies start fixing them.

If you want a 997 then I'd still suggest Gen 2. It's a great car and the vast majority don't have engine problems.

itsybitsy

5,987 posts

214 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
Gibbo205 said:
Gen2 is vastly improved. But if neglected or abused then I'm sure they an still suffer.
+1
but no proven cases to date due to poor design/cooling(but early 2.9 engines did have issues with pistons/rings).yes there has been a couple of random failures and borescoring has been mentioned but the most recent case turns out to be something else.but that is not to say as the engines approach high mileage it wont happen,the cayenne apparently shares same bore coating and their has been talk of bore scoring on 100k+ miles.just make sure the oil is changed more regular than manufacturers 2year 20k miles which is madness imho on a 300+bhp engine.
don't assume you are safe buying a mezger turbo there has also been a few random failures and post 2008 cars use the dfi lump.
for piece of mind just get the warranty and keep it going



Edited by itsybitsy on Saturday 20th July 12:07

Ekona

1,684 posts

231 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
Agreed. I'd say the DFI engine is proving itself to be as reliable as the Mezger units, so far. The occasional failure, but nothing outside of what can occur on mass-produced engines. Certainly no sign of design-related faults, anyway.

fioran0

2,410 posts

201 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
Ekona said:
Agreed. I'd say the DFI engine is proving itself to be as reliable as the Mezger units, so far, for driving around on the road
Corrected.

f1ashgordon

264 posts

165 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
Of the two gen2 ''bore scoring' incidents, mine turned out to be a misaligned piston ring. They replaced the linings and the pistons with 991 spec.

There was no scoring of note, but as a precaution porsche GmbH authorised that, so after almost a month of enjoying brand new caymans I got mine back, good as new, possibly better.

I wouldn't think twice about buying another cared for gen2 and will keep mine indefinitely BUT I wouldn't buy without a warranty; it more than paid for itself in the first few months of ownership both in repairs and awesome courtesy cars.

The other incident magic919' was confirmed bore scoring but as to the cause who knows, sometimes stuff happens and his is the only other gen2 I've read about.

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
f1ashgordon said:
I wouldn't think twice about buying another cared for gen2 and will keep mine indefinitely BUT I wouldn't buy without a warranty; it more than paid for itself in the first few months of ownership both in repairs and awesome courtesy cars.

.
Sadly this paragraph says a lot about the modern Porsche. .

f1ashgordon

264 posts

165 months

Saturday 20th July 2013
quotequote all
My other car is a bmw 123d and within a year of ownership I had the renowned DMF/clutch issue and the whole lot replaced under warranty, again, the warranty paid for itself.
Maybe I'm unlucky but maintaining the warranty for me, irrespective of brand (BMW, Audi and Porsche) although expensive, has been cheaper than not. Maybe it's just German cars?!

itsybitsy

5,987 posts

214 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
f1ashgordon said:
Of the two gen2 ''bore scoring' incidents, mine turned out to be a misaligned piston ring. They replaced the linings and the pistons with 991 spec.

There was no scoring of note, but as a precaution porsche GmbH authorised that, so after almost a month of enjoying brand new caymans I got mine back, good as new, possibly better.

I wouldn't think twice about buying another cared for gen2 and will keep mine indefinitely BUT I wouldn't buy without a warranty; it more than paid for itself in the first few months of ownership both in repairs and awesome courtesy cars.

The other incident magic919' was confirmed bore scoring but as to the cause who knows, sometimes stuff happens and his is the only other gen2 I've read about.
I am glad your issue was resolved and you are back on the road and all those persons who slagged me off on the other post are eating humble pie!

f1ashgordon

264 posts

165 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
I was happy with the outcome, so cheers.

Whole process was painless, even fun for me; I live 5min from the OPC, they gave me nice cars etc, so credit where it's due to the OPC and the warranty.


itsybitsy

5,987 posts

214 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
just out of interest why did they use 991 spec. pistons/liners are 981/991 engines a further improvement on the 987.2/997.2?????

f1ashgordon

264 posts

165 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
I can only give you a vague ''I think so'.

It's what I was told, directive was from Germany, they took a big interest in this one from the initial diagnosis. I'm not sure the 991 dfi engine is all that different though.

I can ask, but by that time I was keen to get back in my car so didn't bother digging too deeply. Initial I went to see the car stripped down, daily updates etc but was abroad when the final work order was instructed and completed.

itsybitsy

5,987 posts

214 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
so it does make me wonder were there discreet improvements over the model years to the bores/rings etc.. and why like my spyder and some late production model 997.2s they introduced a 2012(C) model year for an unknown reason?it does make me wonder especially as they fitted your car with the 991 liner/rings which the 991 also started out as a 2012(C) model year!!!!!!
when my car goes for a service I will certainly ask the question because there will be a difference in part numbers ie 2011 vs 2012 model years

Terminator X

20,611 posts

233 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
Magic919 said:
The failure itself didn't match up the Gen 1 problems and it is nowhere near as widespread. It would be foolish to try to explain the cause, but we may find out eventually when Indies start fixing them.

If you want a 997 then I'd still suggest Gen 2. It's a great car and the vast majority don't have engine problems.
Whole thing is t'internet scaremongering, how many 996's and 997's have been sold vs problem cars? Imho you'd need to be very unlucky to get caught out. Drive them and enjoy them ffs.

TX.

Ekona

1,684 posts

231 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
fioran0 said:
Ekona said:
Agreed. I'd say the DFI engine is proving itself to be as reliable as the Mezger units, so far, for driving around on the road
Corrected.
Interesting, has there been many DFI units fail on track then? Must admit I don't tend to keep up with stuff like that, is there an inherent weakness for track work? I've only had mine out the once, so would be very interested to know if there was something else there.

Or have I misinterpreted your comment, and you were meaning more that the DFI hasn't been proven on track in any great numbers yet, referring to the 991 GT3 and the future of that engine?

fioran0

2,410 posts

201 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
Ekona said:
Interesting, has there been many DFI units fail on track then? Must admit I don't tend to keep up with stuff like that, is there an inherent weakness for track work? I've only had mine out the once, so would be very interested to know if there was something else there.

Or have I misinterpreted your comment, and you were meaning more that the DFI hasn't been proven on track in any great numbers yet, referring to the 991 GT3 and the future of that engine?
neither, i just felt that your opinion regarding the reliability of the new engines needed tempered slightly by making it a bit more specific. i wasnt making or trying to imply anything beyond that.





Edited by fioran0 on Sunday 21st July 16:11

Ekona

1,684 posts

231 months

Sunday 21st July 2013
quotequote all
No probs, just wondered if there was something I was missing.