Porsche 964 Targa vs. 3.2 Targa.
Porsche 964 Targa vs. 3.2 Targa.
Author
Discussion

Biggles111

Original Poster:

466 posts

292 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
I have always fancied 964's since they came out, and was impressed with the rawness of one when I went in a colleague's recently. On the other hand the styling of the 3.2 is iconic and something I grew up wanting. I only do 200 miles or so a month, so also like the idea of no depreciation, and am used to 'classic' cars. Decisions...

I am on a budget, so am looking for one of either, probably in targa format to get the best car for the money (low teens). I am aware of the rust issues on the 3.2 and the oil leak issues on the 964, and will go in with my eyes open.

Some options are below - does anyone know these cars?

1) 964 C4 Targa. Local to me, wheels and rear bridge spoiler are a bit OTT to me though - if the car checks out these could presumably come off and be sold? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/271057913045?ssPageName=...

2) 964 C2 Targa white, 1991 at eporsch - looks original though at this price will not be perfect, the guys there seem to have a good reputation, does anyone know the car?

3) 3.2 Targa in red, 1985, at TWG - sounds solid, though a long way from me, interesting if it checks out
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...

Vic_S

230 posts

270 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
They are quite different to drive, but I have always preferred the 964 wink You really need to drive both and see for yourself.

The Targa's seem to be coming back into favour and that red one could be good. Selling the wheels & rear wing would be no problem. And it comes with Sports Seats, which is a nice option to have.

A recent engine rebuild is good, depending on who did it and what was done...

A full Indy PPI is vital on these cars if you don't know them well yourself, as the bills can quickly come to ££££'s.

But enjoy the hunt, they are FUN cars smile


Biggles111

Original Poster:

466 posts

292 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
Thanks Vic - your C2 looks very nice too!

carcrazypop

579 posts

193 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
Vic_S said:
They are quite different to drive, but I have always preferred the 964 wink You really need to drive both and see for yourself.

The Targa's seem to be coming back into favour and that red one could be good. Selling the wheels & rear wing would be no problem. And it comes with Sports Seats, which is a nice option to have.

A recent engine rebuild is good, depending on who did it and what was done...

A full Indy PPI is vital on these cars if you don't know them well yourself, as the bills can quickly come to ££££'s.

But enjoy the hunt, they are FUN cars smile
As said above, you really need to get a test drive in both cars as they're quite different; also, 964 has PAS & 3.2's don't.

I've had both and if I had to pick a 'keeper', I'd probably go for a 964, IMHO naturally.

Good Luck, both great cars by the way if you buy wisely.

ClassicCarMad

385 posts

202 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
Biggles111 said:
I have always fancied 964's since they came out, and was impressed with the rawness of one when I went in a colleague's recently. On the other hand the styling of the 3.2 is iconic and something I grew up wanting. I only do 200 miles or so a month, so also like the idea of no depreciation, and am used to 'classic' cars. Decisions...

I am on a budget, so am looking for one of either, probably in targa format to get the best car for the money (low teens). I am aware of the rust issues on the 3.2 and the oil leak issues on the 964, and will go in with my eyes open.

Some options are below - does anyone know these cars?

1) 964 C4 Targa. Local to me, wheels and rear bridge spoiler are a bit OTT to me though - if the car checks out these could presumably come off and be sold? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/271057913045?ssPageName=...

2) 964 C2 Targa white, 1991 at eporsch - looks original though at this price will not be perfect, the guys there seem to have a good reputation, does anyone know the car?

3) 3.2 Targa in red, 1985, at TWG - sounds solid, though a long way from me, interesting if it checks out
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
The 3.2 is the more classic of the two and will be a better longterm purchase
Personally I prefer it looks etc but its a personal preference



carcrazypop

579 posts

193 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
ClassicCarMad said:
The 3.2 is the more classic of the two and will be a better longterm purchase
Personally I prefer it looks etc but its a personal preference
'and will be a better longterm purchase', really ?? not so sure myself and I don't possess a crystal ball.

Biggles111

Original Poster:

466 posts

292 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
Thanks all - will go out and try some next week as have a week off. If anyone sees a sensibly priced solid example of either let me know!

boxsey

3,579 posts

239 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
Biggles111 said:
Thanks all - will go out and try some next week as have a week off. If anyone sees a sensibly priced solid example of either let me know!
If you want to find out more about 964s, there are 10 of us at Donington Park on Sunday. No targas unfortunately but we're all happy to chat in between going on track. smile

Biggles111

Original Poster:

466 posts

292 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
Thanks for the offer - am based in Devon, so won't be able to make it as a bit of a haul, but much appreciated!

mr pg

2,066 posts

234 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
I had a 964, so that would be my choice, not surprisingly. The sports seats are a definite plus. The wheels don't help, but for me when I was looking, power steering, and ABS was important. Personally, I think the 3.2 spoiler looks a bit of an overkill too. Make sure there's no bubbling by the shark fins, and where rear wing meets bumper behind rear wheel.

marky911

4,433 posts

248 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
A drive of each will tell you straight away.

I'm another person that's in the 964 camp having owned a 3.2, a 964 C2 and a 964 Turbo.

The 3.2s look great and are an icon but they drive like old tractors. Depends what you like though. smile

zero corrosion

470 posts

217 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
3.2.
The last classic 911 IMO
Stunning looking too
964's great but those bumpers nooooooooooooooooooo !!

Err Indoors

909 posts

216 months

Friday 2nd August 2013
quotequote all
If you want a recognisable classic 911, then the 3.2 is the car by a big mile
Sure the 964 is better to drive and more modern, but if its a weekend classic then the older car will be worth more long-term, like most IB cars now.

Biggles111

Original Poster:

466 posts

292 months

Saturday 3rd August 2013
quotequote all
Interesting range of views, I look forward to trying some out....

Wozy68

5,436 posts

199 months

Saturday 3rd August 2013
quotequote all
Err Indoors said:
If you want a recognisable classic 911, then the 3.2 is the car by a big mile
Sure the 964 is better to drive and more modern, but if its a weekend classic then the older car will be worth more long-term, like most IB cars now.
How you can state that a 3.2 is far more recognisable than a 964 is beyond me, and I'm not so sure about that last bit about value either; Coupe maybe but Targa is as good or even better bet in a 964 IMO than a 3.2, it suits the shape better as well.

ClassicCarMad

385 posts

202 months

Saturday 3rd August 2013
quotequote all
Wozy68 said:
Err Indoors said:
If you want a recognisable classic 911, then the 3.2 is the car by a big mile
Sure the 964 is better to drive and more modern, but if its a weekend classic then the older car will be worth more long-term, like most IB cars now.
How you can state that a 3.2 is far more recognisable than a 964 is beyond me, and I'm not so sure about that last bit about value either; Coupe maybe but Targa is as good or even better bet in a 964 IMO than a 3.2, it suits the shape better as well.
I don't believe anybody is sure as we all speculate some wishful thinking, but I tend to agree on the 3.2 v 964 scenario, i'd have my money in the 3.2 whether its a targa or not, its just a classic and unfortunately the 964 isn't in vanilla models.

Wozy68

5,436 posts

199 months

Saturday 3rd August 2013
quotequote all
ClassicCarMad said:
Wozy68 said:
Err Indoors said:
If you want a recognisable classic 911, then the 3.2 is the car by a big mile
Sure the 964 is better to drive and more modern, but if its a weekend classic then the older car will be worth more long-term, like most IB cars now.
How you can state that a 3.2 is far more recognisable than a 964 is beyond me, and I'm not so sure about that last bit about value either; Coupe maybe but Targa is as good or even better bet in a 964 IMO than a 3.2, it suits the shape better as well.
I don't believe anybody is sure as we all speculate some wishful thinking, but I tend to agree on the 3.2 v 964 scenario, i'd have my money in the 3.2 whether its a targa or not, its just a classic and unfortunately the 964 isn't in vanilla models.
Personally It doesn't really bother me one way or another on what either are worth, (though i know personally id have the 964 and stuff all this, 'which one will be of more value in the future'). it was more the comment about the 3.2 being easily more recognisable as a 911 than the 964 I thought a bizarre comment.



Edited by Wozy68 on Saturday 3rd August 21:13

Err Indoors

909 posts

216 months

Saturday 3rd August 2013
quotequote all
Wozy68 said:
ClassicCarMad said:
Wozy68 said:
Err Indoors said:
If you want a recognisable classic 911, then the 3.2 is the car by a big mile
Sure the 964 is better to drive and more modern, but if its a weekend classic then the older car will be worth more long-term, like most IB cars now.
How you can state that a 3.2 is far more recognisable than a 964 is beyond me, and I'm not so sure about that last bit about value either; Coupe maybe but Targa is as good or even better bet in a 964 IMO than a 3.2, it suits the shape better as well.
I don't believe anybody is sure as we all speculate some wishful thinking, but I tend to agree on the 3.2 v 964 scenario, i'd have my money in the 3.2 whether its a targa or not, its just a classic and unfortunately the 964 isn't in vanilla models.
Personally It doesn't really bother me one way or another on what either are worth, (though i know personally id have the 964 and stuff all this, 'which one will be of more value in the future'). it was more the comment about the 3.2 being easily more recognisable as a 911 than the 964 I thought a bizarre comment.



Edited by Wozy68 on Saturday 3rd August 21:13
Maybe you should read the post again
I said a more recognisable classic 911 FFS. loser

Wozy68

5,436 posts

199 months

Saturday 3rd August 2013
quotequote all
Err Indoors said:
Maybe you should read the post again
I said a more recognisable classic 911 FFS. loser
Maybe you should re-read mine. I do not see the 3.2 (as you stated) being 'by a big mile' more of a 'recognisable' classic than the 964. IMO

Edited. I'd forget to add the FFS. Unfortunately I can't add the loser icon on this phone. Damn I feel hard done by.



Edited by Wozy68 on Saturday 3rd August 22:27

zero corrosion

470 posts

217 months

Saturday 3rd August 2013
quotequote all
I prefer the 3.2 Targa and personally think its far more of a classic 911 also.
Although not in Targa form it is the like the 930 an Iconic 911.
Is a 964 Carrera targa Iconic?
No.