2017 RSR
Author
Discussion

ttdan

Original Poster:

1,113 posts

222 months

Tuesday 15th November 2016
quotequote all
Gets revealed tomorrow at the LA autoshow.

Given that this may point to the future of the road car at some point...maybe..

What do we think it will be? Turbo'd, "mid " engined, RWS? We know they need to up their game considerably in this class to comptete at the sharp end again and that early pics a few months were of the front of the car only. All will be revealed tomorrow but i get the feeling its a major departure from the format we all know and love.





Edited by ttdan on Tuesday 15th November 22:20

hunter 66

4,190 posts

249 months

Tuesday 15th November 2016
quotequote all
Yes things are to change ........back in the good old days they made two thirds the grid in GTN ........ 33-40 cars a year , now a handful ....

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

294 months

Tuesday 15th November 2016
quotequote all
They are just putting the engine in the right place at last.

Find out in a few hours anyway :-)

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

294 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
470BHp 4.0L


BubblesNW

1,711 posts

212 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
470BHp 4.0L

No turbo. clap

From EVO...

Unlike the Ford GT and Ferrari 488, however, the 911 RSR is not turbocharged. Instead it’s powered by new four-litre water-cooled flat-six. The old RSR continued to use the illustrious Mezger engine, but with the 911 Cup and R powered by a more modern unit, Porsche took the decision to have a uniformed engine structure. The new engine also gets the direct injection and with LM-GTE rules designed to allow both turbocharged and atmospheric engines air to the engine is restricted to allow a level playing field. Depending on the size of the restrictor used the RSR’s engine can produce up to 503bhp.

Edited by BubblesNW on Wednesday 16th November 18:41

GT4P

5,964 posts

214 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
Yes 510 hp now on Porsche website

isaldiri

24,652 posts

197 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
Unless they have had some kind of deal with the ACO to get rules in their favour, staying NA they are just going to get killed by the turbo race cars. And engine in front of the rear axle means it's no longer a 911 imo.

BubblesNW

1,711 posts

212 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
Unless they have had some kind of deal with the ACO to get rules in their favour, staying NA they are just going to get killed by the turbo race cars. And engine in front of the rear axle means it's no longer a 911 imo.
But they couldn't call it the Cayman RSR could they?

The rules apparently even out NA vs. turbo : we will have to wait and see.

gerlewis

115 posts

258 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
So the new 911 is a Cayman ...

ChrisW.

8,130 posts

284 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
1243 kilos --- ten years ago they were 1100 kilos with 430 bhp --- ?

Interestingly Evo say rear engined and Autocar mid engined --- either way if the engine is in front of the rear axle and the gearbox is behind, then it must be a Cayman !

Is this where the GT4 is given permission to overtake the GT3 --- and becomes the new 911 ?

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

294 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
I have no words lol

MDL111

8,873 posts

206 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
mid-engined 911 GT3RS at your dealers soon - awesome

Lox

641 posts

310 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
And engine in front of the rear axle means it's no longer a 911 imo.
Ditto the GT1?

LaSource

2,642 posts

237 months

Wednesday 16th November 2016
quotequote all
2017 MY pics here...









4.0 DFI NA engine producing 510bhp (and of course ahead of rear axle)
Engine / gearbox swapped
New rear exhaust structure to accommodate a proper rear diffuser


isaldiri

24,652 posts

197 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
Lox said:
isaldiri said:
And engine in front of the rear axle means it's no longer a 911 imo.
Ditto the GT1?
imo yes. Sticking on a 911 fascia onto a mid engine sports prototype GT1 didn't make it a 911 either.

Fl0pp3r

870 posts

232 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
is it me or is that backend looking a bit 'Halfords'?... hurl

Lox

641 posts

310 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
imo yes. Sticking on a 911 fascia onto a mid engine sports prototype GT1 didn't make it a 911 either.
Agreed. The RSR does at least look like a 911!

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

294 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
Lox said:
Agreed. The RSR does at least look like a 911!
but more like a GT4 lol

Digga

48,029 posts

312 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
Fl0pp3r said:
is it me or is that backend looking a bit 'Halfords'?... hurl
Below bumper line does look horribly unresolved in aesthetic terms.

As for it being mid-engined, well the cream of the GT 911s don't have actual rear seats, so it's no big deal really IMHO.

Ekona

1,684 posts

231 months

Thursday 17th November 2016
quotequote all
I love everything about that. Looks aggressive & purposeful, NA engined, probably great balance being MR too.

But it's not a 911. At all.


The GT1 is one of my favourite racing cars of all time, but that's not a 911 either.