Two people dead in CGT track accident
Two people dead in CGT track accident
Author
Discussion

GuyR

Original Poster:

2,536 posts

309 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all

I just read this on the 6Speed forum that I know a few people on here also frequent and I wasn't really sure whether to cross-post it, but it is very sad news and something I guess we should all be aware of when considering our own (sometimes carefree) attitude to speed either at track events or Top Speed days.

Bascially two people died in a CGT at a trackday yesterday in California. The driver of the CGT was a well-known and respected forum member on 6Speed who I have chatted to there.

The public news channels have info here:

http://www.nbc4.tv/news/4562562/detail.html#

The full set of posts on 6Speed is here:

http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=27663&perpage=15&pagenumber=1

All I can say is that it certainly made me think about how lightly we treat speed sometimes and how dangerous it can sadly prove to be on rare occasions, even at places and in vehicles that you would think otherwise.

Guy

verysideways

10,268 posts

299 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
Hard to believe two people died from this - the passenger compartment looks remarkably intact, in the pictures on NBC you can see the seats and airbags and so on.

Sad news.


Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
Crikey... sorry to hear the news.

Does remind you of what can happen if it all goes wrong...

GuyR

Original Poster:

2,536 posts

309 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all

The carbon monocoque is very strong, so it doesn't distort, but the deceleration has to go somewhere i.e. into the occupants bodies.

The car is almost adjaecent to where it hit the barrier, so this suggests the impact was almost head-on, so a huge amount of energy would have been dissipated in a short distance, which equals very high instantaneous g-force.

dazren

22,612 posts

288 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
Terrible news.

DAZ

>> Edited by dazren on Friday 3rd June 10:17

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
GuyR said:

The carbon monocoque is very strong, so it doesn't distort, but the deceleration has to go somewhere i.e. into the occupants bodies.

The car is almost adjaecent to where it hit the barrier, so this suggests the impact was almost head-on, so a huge amount of energy would have been dissipated in a short distance, which equals very high instantaneous g-force.


Interestingly there doesn't appear to be a great deal of deformation. I'm not sure on the specifics of the CGT's crash structure, but I agree with what you are saying. Technology has now got to the stage where the occupant protection cell remains intact, however the fragility of the human body is still something of a weak point...

clubsport

7,408 posts

285 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
I saw this on Rennlist and couldn't quite believe the terrible outcome....Guy is right for us to consider our attitude to speed, it also makes you wonder if a hans neck restraint and correctly secure harness would have made a difference?

GT3 Rob

1,447 posts

261 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
verysideways said:
Hard to believe two people died from this - the passenger compartment looks remarkably intact, in the pictures on NBC you can see the seats and airbags and so on.

Sad news.




That is an incredible accident, as already said, the car does not look badly damaged.. but the sudden de-acceleration would have been considerable upon the occupants.!

Think Porsche will be seriously looking into this one, and possible lawsuits to follow, it is in the US after all.!

I know the driver was a member on the Rennlist forum, so condolences to his family.

It does show you, how easliy things can go badly wrong on track, even when you think you're quite safe..(crash helmet, crash barriers etc.)

steve rance

5,453 posts

258 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
The CGT's that i've been in dont have harnesses. Broken necks or lateral head impacts are likely in high speed impacts. Hans and harness combination will help a lot.

Steve R

verysideways

10,268 posts

299 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
I heard the figure 150mph mentioned on Renn - if that's the case and it was almost head on, then again GuyR's spot on the money.

The human body has a remarkable ability to be both enormously strong and shockingly fragile.

It seems the passenger was a prospective CGT buyer. RIP.

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
verysideways said:
The human body has a remarkable ability to be both enormously strong and shockingly fragile.


Strange isn't it. The amount of force you can exert through your arm and shoulder is huge relatively speaking, yet a lateral impact will break the clavicle.

It some ways it's like an F1 cars suspension. Incredibly strong and resilient in dealing with the forces it is designed for, yet put a non-standard force on it and it will break relatively easily...

Podie

46,649 posts

302 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
steve rance said:
The CGT's that i've been in dont have harnesses.


Must admit I am surprised that they are not fitted as standard, given the heritage of the car...

DaGinge

6,740 posts

276 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
Tragic, totally tragic. The guy was a recent father, and had great pictures of his new baby in the seat of his CGT in his web photo album. Thoughts are with his and his passengers families.

leosayer

7,764 posts

271 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
The story may have been different if there was armco and/or a tyre wall instead of solid concrete barriers. A sad day

911nutter

1,916 posts

278 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
DaGinge said:
The guy was a recent father, and had great pictures of his new baby in the seat of his CGT


too close to home. so very sad.

adamt

2,825 posts

279 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
That is a horrendous tragedy, RIP.

rubystone

11,254 posts

286 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
Didn't he hit someone waved out of the pits?....that always worries me - passing the pits with open pit lane - cars came exit at any time - Brands is a ngihtmare for that - in a low car you just can't really see what's coming down the straight

DanH

12,287 posts

287 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
rubystone said:
Didn't he hit someone waved out of the pits?....that always worries me - passing the pits with open pit lane - cars came exit at any time - Brands is a ngihtmare for that - in a low car you just can't really see what's coming down the straight


Apparently a car was waved out, the driver hesitated, his passenger yelled 'go go go' and he did, just as the marshall yelled 'stop'.

At least at brands they shouldn't cut right across your line into paddock.

Its a tragic accident, but without being there I don't think we can hypothesise as to how preventable it was.

bumcrack

977 posts

292 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
That's a big sideway impact, the body( mainly head) can't deal with high G deceleration as effectively as a front-end crash

Poor guys

>> Edited by bumcrack on Friday 3rd June 17:24

DoctorD

1,542 posts

283 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
RIP Ben, you will be missed.