GT3 mods
Author
Discussion

maximu5

Original Poster:

253 posts

252 months

Sunday 20th November 2005
quotequote all
I own a standard GT3 Mk 1 Clubsport which I have bought primarily for track days. If I had 10k to spend, what would be the priority modifications to make it go faster around a track ?

s3am

1,383 posts

279 months

Sunday 20th November 2005
quotequote all
Off the top of my head.

Good track geo setup/new suspension
Better front brakes. Brembo floating.
Driver training (if you need it)
Manthey tuning package. If your feeling flush.

erm.

Parr or JZM should do the trick.

Sam

>> Edited by s3am on Sunday 20th November 18:33

zanzibar

234 posts

266 months

Sunday 20th November 2005
quotequote all
My order of importance others might not agree..

1. Michelin Pilot Sport Cups or Pirelli Corsa.

2. To get the most out of the tyres a good track set up.

3. Ditch the front 4 pot brake calipers & upgrade to the Mk2/RS Six pot, fit Floating discs Alcon or Brembo
+ Castrol SRF brake fluid, Pagid RS29 pads.

4. Do as many track days as you can and get some decent tuition.

5. Ditch the standard suspension & fit Manthey KW or JRZ.

6. K400 engine upgrade by Manthey.

SJN2004

4,051 posts

264 months

Sunday 20th November 2005
quotequote all
Manthey claim that the K440 engine upgrade to the GT3RS will give a top speed of 333kmph (206mph) which sounds highly optimistic for a 60 HP increase. Anybody seen real world tests that prove their figures?

s3am

1,383 posts

279 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
If they claim it, then I would have no reason to doubt it.

Given that a 381hp GT3 can theoretically do 190, I don't think its unbelivable that a 440hp one could do 200+ with the narrow body etc. 206 *might* be pusing it though!

egbert

449 posts

248 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
I seem to remember from a Veyron article that an extra 7bhp was needed for each 1 kmh increase top speed.

60 bhp = 8.5 km = 5mph

in itself optimistic but with aerodynamic upgrade quite possible.

Glenn McMenamin

2,305 posts

265 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
SJN2004 said:
Manthey claim that the K440 engine upgrade to the GT3RS will give a top speed of 333kmph (206mph) which sounds highly optimistic for a 60 HP increase. Anybody seen real world tests that prove their figures?



I've never heard of the K440 ?, only a K400 and a K410.

Is this new ?


G

maximu5

Original Poster:

253 posts

252 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
Thanks to Zanzibar and s3am for their comments.

What do "floating" discs mean ?

I saw that Brembo offer an 8 pot front disc brake set with 380 mm discs. Anybody have experience with these ?

flemke

23,438 posts

264 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
egbert said:
I seem to remember from a Veyron article that an extra 7bhp was needed for each 1 kmh increase top speed.

60 bhp = 8.5 km = 5mph

in itself optimistic but with aerodynamic upgrade quite possible.
That equation applies at 400kmh. You'd need less of a bhp increase at a lower speed.

flemke

23,438 posts

264 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
s3am said:
If they claim it, then I would have no reason to doubt it.

Given that a 381hp GT3 can theoretically do 190, I don't think its unbelivable that a 440hp one could do 200+ with the narrow body etc. 206 *might* be pusing it though!
To date, they've only done the developed conversion to their race car and to one road car.
The max speed of the road car has not been tested. It has some aero mods that increase downforce - not sure if they increase drag. I suppose that when the weather gets better a max run on the A5 can be done to answer the question, but it doesn't really matter, does it? The car makes a Mk II feel slow.

henry-f

4,791 posts

272 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
Wise words from Zanzibar in terms of order of spend and value for money.

Floating discs allow for some movement between the disc and it`s mounting bell (the bit that sits on the wheel studs /hubs. This helps expansion and contraction. These discs normally use anti glaze grooves rather than holes. This reduces cracking as the disc ages. You need to weigh their fitment up against cost. There is nothing wrong with the standard set up but you will need to chage them more regularly.

On the race car we use floating discs because their life expectancy reduces the need to change components mid race. At the recent Silverstone 24 hour race we could have used a single set of discs / pads ! (we only changed the pads as a matter of course whilst the new drive shaft was being fitted at hour 18).

Finally 6 pot callipers will be more than enough. To be honest on road based tyres even the 4 pots will beat the tyre grip.

Henry

egbert

449 posts

248 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
name said:
That equation applies at 400kmh. You'd need less of a bhp increase at a lower speed.


I'd love to know the equivalent calculation at 300kph-not least to work out the theoretical V-max of my 996 with 470 bhp.

jeremyc

27,803 posts

311 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
s3am said:
Given that a 381hp GT3 can theoretically do 190, I don't think its unbelivable that a 440hp one could do 200+ with the narrow body etc. 206 *might* be pusing it though!
Nope: ignoring the effects of overcoming rolling resistance (which will only further reduce the max speed) 440bhp will give a top speed of 199mph if 381bhp gives 190mph.

Full theory, equations and stuff are in an excellent white paper here

flemke

23,438 posts

264 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
jeremyc said:
s3am said:
Given that a 381hp GT3 can theoretically do 190, I don't think its unbelivable that a 440hp one could do 200+ with the narrow body etc. 206 *might* be pusing it though!
Nope: ignoring the effects of overcoming rolling resistance (which will only further reduce the max speed) 440bhp will give a top speed of 199mph if 381bhp gives 190mph.

Full theory, equations and stuff are in an excellent white paper here
And actually the car in which we got 190 GPS max was measured on Manthey's honest, un-hyping rolling road at 385 bhp, which takes us closer to 198 for the 440.
As I said, the MR440 does have some aero mods which definitely increase downforce. It is possible that they reduce drag as well, and by Jeremy's same equation a small reduction in drag will beget a 'larger' increase in max speed, so 206 is not out of the question.
I suppose that we'll have to test it when the weather is better.

DanH

12,287 posts

287 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
flemke said:
jeremyc said:
s3am said:
Given that a 381hp GT3 can theoretically do 190, I don't think its unbelivable that a 440hp one could do 200+ with the narrow body etc. 206 *might* be pusing it though!
Nope: ignoring the effects of overcoming rolling resistance (which will only further reduce the max speed) 440bhp will give a top speed of 199mph if 381bhp gives 190mph.

Full theory, equations and stuff are in an excellent white paper here
And actually the car in which we got 190 GPS max was measured on Manthey's honest, un-hyping rolling road at 385 bhp, which takes us closer to 198 for the 440.
As I said, the MR440 does have some aero mods which definitely increase downforce. It is possible that they reduce drag as well, and by Jeremy's same equation a small reduction in drag will beget a 'larger' increase in max speed, so 206 is not out of the question.
I suppose that we'll have to test it when the weather is better.


Is it your car that has been modded then?

egbert

449 posts

248 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
Thanks Jeremyc-very interesting.

flemke

23,438 posts

264 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all

DanH,

This is possible.

DanH

12,287 posts

287 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
flemke said:

DanH,

This is possible.


Have they explained what their thinking is with the GT2 style wing, especially over the cup car assembly? My German is hopeless, so I have real trouble navigating the Manthey site.

flemke

23,438 posts

264 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
DanH said:
flemke said:

DanH,

This is possible.


Have they explained what their thinking is with the GT2 style wing, especially over the cup car assembly? My German is hopeless, so I have real trouble navigating the Manthey site.
Just call them - 0049 269 193370. Ask for Rainer - his English is the best. Or you can ask JZM - Steve would probably know.
I can't say what the thinking is with that wing over the GT3, but remember that you can only add rear downforce to the extent that you balance it with front downforce. As it is, the extended front splitter that they use is a bit of a pain in the real world, so I wouldn't want to aggravate the problem. Then again, the front splitter on the Cup car is pretty puny, but the whole thing does not have much downforce - I am living proof of that.
Olaf has a lot of integrity, so he would never add something for its cosmetic appeal unless it also worked properly.

s3am

1,383 posts

279 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
jeremyc said:
s3am said:
Given that a 381hp GT3 can theoretically do 190, I don't think its unbelivable that a 440hp one could do 200+ with the narrow body etc. 206 *might* be pusing it though!
Nope: ignoring the effects of overcoming rolling resistance (which will only further reduce the max speed) 440bhp will give a top speed of 199mph if 381bhp gives 190mph.

Full theory, equations and stuff are in an excellent white paper here


I was just guessing!