Does anyone know a 996 turbo J B**ger (or similar) ?
Does anyone know a 996 turbo J B**ger (or similar) ?
Author
Discussion

phib

Original Poster:

4,520 posts

287 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2006
quotequote all
Not my usual kind of post but ..........

This evening around the woking / m25 area tonight at about 5.30 ish. Grey 996 turbo reg J B**ger (meant to read some sort of name)

If so would you please inform the complete prat driving that as he decided to undertake in the pooring rain on a dual carrage way at circa 100mph + (50 mph speed limit) that not only is it the worst driving I have seen in ages but the police man in the layby was quite interested as well !!!!! (serves you right hopefully dangerous driving and a ban)

I can now seriously see why the general public think that only d**k heads drive porsches

What a muppet

RANT OVER !!!!!

Phib in the 993 behind him doing about 50 !!!!!

porsche4life

1,164 posts

253 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2006
quotequote all
No, but i can confirm that Dickheads can legally drive any motor vehicle and they can be found on any road in any country.

Was coming home through France, 20 miles from Calais on the motorway which was covered in 4 inches of snow, i was doing 35mph behind two other cars and the only safe part of the road was some tracks which were less deep in snow, Lorry driver seriously tried to overtake me with a) No room anyway and B) no guarantee that the tracks would not put me across his path cos i certainly could not get out of the tracks.

Barking.....

silver993tt

9,064 posts

267 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
phib said:
Not my usual kind of post but ..........

This evening around the woking / m25 area tonight at about 5.30 ish. Grey 996 turbo reg J B**ger (meant to read some sort of name)

If so would you please inform the complete prat driving that as he decided to undertake in the pooring rain on a dual carrage way at circa 100mph + (50 mph speed limit) that not only is it the worst driving I have seen in ages but the police man in the layby was quite interested as well !!!!! (serves you right hopefully dangerous driving and a ban)

I can now seriously see why the general public think that only d**k heads drive porsches

What a muppet

RANT OVER !!!!!

Phib in the 993 behind him doing about 50 !!!!!


If that's the dual carriageway off M25 J11, that road used to be national speed limit with no barrier in the middle. They put the barrier up in the middle making the road much safer but then reduced the liimit to 50 mph. It's dual carriageway, no side roads, armco in the middle - should be 70mph limit.

phib

Original Poster:

4,520 posts

287 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
I agree should be a 70 but the main issue is people pulling out from either side layby's about 800 yards long and usually full of cars, vans etc etc

There were so many accidents with people not looking / pulling out slowly and getting hit which is why they reduced it to a 50.

Don't get me wrong I have no issue with a bit of extra speed in the right location and road conditions, its just people like the driver yesterday who get everone with a porsche or a sports car a bad name.

silver993tt

9,064 posts

267 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
phib said:
I agree should be a 70 but the main issue is people pulling out from either side layby's about 800 yards long and usually full of cars, vans etc etc

There were so many accidents with people not looking / pulling out slowly and getting hit which is why they reduced it to a 50.

Don't get me wrong I have no issue with a bit of extra speed in the right location and road conditions, its just people like the driver yesterday who get everone with a porsche or a sports car a bad name.


Why the hell do u need a layby on a stretch of road that is

a) about half a mile long
b) about half a mile from loads of normal street parking

The layby should be removed - end of problems

rumplestiltskin

1,084 posts

250 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
I know that stretch of road very well, it certainly should be more than a 50 and is often driven like it is.
If the policeman in the layby didn't stop the driver at the time then not much he can do about it, no way of knowing his speed apart from guestimate etc - I mean the most is a nice letter through the post I guess telling him to be careful.

Rump.

turboguru

448 posts

258 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
Morning! I also know that road well and have to say I always thought it was a 70? hmmn will have to check it more carefully next time. I often get people trying to race me too and really annoys me but I am still amazed if that Turbo driver was doing more than 70 as the road surface there is so bad I always find I need to take it really easy as it pulls you all over the place and in the wet I reakon anymore than 70 would put you in a ditch?

Still boy racers hey! world's full of nutters these days giving us Turbo drivers a bad name

pdavison

1,639 posts

305 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
I know this 911 as it joins the M3 from A316 every evening (the plate is obvious). He always makes fairly rapid progress but driving like that is just drawing unnecessary attention to yourself.

If he drives like that regularly he'll come unstuck soon.

barry_j

605 posts

264 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
I'm not advocating dangerous driving and not having seen the specific incident I can't comment on it. However, the fact that there was enough room for someone to undertake you at 100mph means that you were in the wrong lane.

One thing I notice about driving in the UK compared to the continent is that people in the UK seem to think that they can hog the outside or middle lane even when the inside lane is empty. I stress I'm not defending this particular driver as it sounds like he p*sses people off regularly but if more lane etiquette was used then there would be less incidents like this.

You'll notice a few PH guys contribute to:
www.middlelanemorons.com/

Marki

15,763 posts

298 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
barry_j said:
I'm not advocating dangerous driving and not having seen the specific incident I can't comment on it. However, the fact that there was enough room for someone to undertake you at 100mph means that you were in the wrong lane.



Fair point

phib

Original Poster:

4,520 posts

287 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
It wasn't me in the outside lane !!!

I was behind the 996 (in a my 993)and he decided to undertake a eurobox who was in the right lane and to be honest should have been in the left hand lane.

Still no real excuse though for the speed though.

Re his speed yes it a guess but having driven fast cars for a while I think its a fairly good guess, his rear spoiler was well and truely up !!!!

I am sure we have all driven a little too fast but this was just plain stupidity !!!

pdV6

16,442 posts

289 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
Marki said:
barry_j said:
I'm not advocating dangerous driving and not having seen the specific incident I can't comment on it. However, the fact that there was enough room for someone to undertake you at 100mph means that you were in the wrong lane.



Fair point

Not necessarily, especially if driving with an appropriate gap to the car in front (which would have been quite large given the weather conditions). Any tit in a fast car can zap past on the inside and into your braking zone if they choose. Doesn't make them right or you wrong though, does it?

Marki

15,763 posts

298 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
No ,, but he has a point , if the guy was doing 100 and you were say 4 car lengths from the car in front then him moving at the ton he must have gone some place

phib

Original Poster:

4,520 posts

287 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
All I can say is the brakes must be bl**dy good on a 996 in the wet !!!!!!! Because he seriously stood on them comming up to the car about 5 car lenghts ahead of the one he undertook !!! Would'nt have even thought about it in the 993 in the dry !!

At the end of the day he ended up one car ahead of me for the next 6 miles !!!

barry_j

605 posts

264 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
phib said:
It wasn't me in the outside lane !!!
I was behind the 996 (in a my 993)and he decided to undertake a eurobox who was in the right lane and to be honest should have been in the left hand lane.


Apologies phib, I thought it was you in the outside lane. The eurobox needs to learn some lane etiquette.

By the way, for those who are unsure undertaking is NOT illegal (of course, dangerous driving is):
www.middlelanemorons.com/script/middle_lane_morons_prob.php#RESPONSE

>> Edited by barry_j on Wednesday 4th January 13:42

Raven Flyer

1,645 posts

252 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
I only have a N/A 996 so my spoiler has either up or down settings.

Is 'well and truly up' only available on 996TTs?

Adam B

29,642 posts

282 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
Raven Flyer said:
I only have a N/A 996 so my spoiler has either up or down settings.

Is 'well and truly up' only available on 996TTs?


its adjustable manually too - and he could have been one of the plonkers that drives round with the rear spoiler up at 30mph - certainly sounds the type

iguana

7,329 posts

288 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
Heard of doms/carzees site before but never visited, particually like the Earl of Boltons foreword-



"FOREWORD BY DERESTRICTOR

In a world obsessed with the cult of self, and human nature increasingly devoid of any redeeming features, one particularly loathsome particle of motoring flotsam has outshone all other detritus and claimed the pinnacle act of anti-social automotive selfishness as its own.

We call this worthless insect THE MIDDLE LANE MORON.

I seek not to examine their motives or decrypt their rationale: that is an area into which others may delve on the following pages. My aim is simply to rattle the sabre and issue a battle cry that all shall hear – for this is their Nemesis calling:

It is time for them to be held to account for their numptyism, and pay the price for a million and one instances of blind, loathsome, selfish stupidity. This forum shall be our means of smiting them; we shall expose, humiliate, and hopefully, secure the recantation, of these carriageway cretins.

And if just one moron turns from the path of vile, moronic lane hoggery, then there will be ample cause indeed for celebration in Petrol Heaven.

DeR"

rumplestiltskin

1,084 posts

250 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
So he has undertakien a car that you admit should have been in the inside lane, ie hogging the outside lane and his speed maybe touched 85mph (you say 100mph but in the dark & rain you probably overestimated it)

Don't really see the problem. Did you stay in the outside lane behind the hogger or undertake as well?

Drive it like you stole it I say.
You wanna dawdle around at 40mph everywhere then go get a fiesta.

NickD

417 posts

290 months

Wednesday 4th January 2006
quotequote all
now where did I put my wa***r smilie?