Carrera GT - why would you bother?
Carrera GT - why would you bother?
Author
Discussion

johnny g-pipe

Original Poster:

174 posts

271 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
C-GT: Same performance as the self shifting 997TT, same seats as the GT3, funny lookin', dodgy clutch, dodgy residuals...why would you bother?! A 964RS and a holiday home in the Eiffel mountains would be a much cooler use of the cash..

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

293 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
the same 0-60 does not make it the same performance.

the Carrera GT is a Supercar.

The 997TT is a Super car

scotty_917

1,034 posts

250 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
Similar performance from a 959 and far more practical....to carry your bits'n'pieces to your holiday home! Keep it's value better to.

Joe911

2,763 posts

263 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
scotty_917 said:
Similar performance from a 959 and far more practical....to carry your bits'n'pieces to your holiday home! Keep it's value better to.

The numbers may be similar - the delivery is not.

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

293 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
johnny g-pipe said:
A 964RS and a holiday home in the Eiffel mountains would be a much cooler use of the cash..


I am sure those buying the CGT would not already have the Holiday home and alternate cars anyway.. so it's not an Either .. Or situation

You need to get into a 'rich' mindset.

ponkyporky

62 posts

248 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all


Also been thinking about this the technology/parts creep is knocking this one. I'm down for the self shifter you mentioned.

Its a case of the 959 factor of having the top of the tree unit and a new technology/design piece item at a given point in time, but it has steep slide in benefit as the 'lesser' units get bits from the 'Halo' model to lift the commercial sales of the mainstream units, All at the expense of those who should not be to hurt by it anyway.

The question in a year or so's time is to choose one or the other of the following: new Turbo Cab fully specced at circa £115,000 and £100-130K (or 997 RS and 25k - 55K cash)in the bank or CGT?

Time we got the poll thingy on PH.

scotty_917

1,034 posts

250 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
Joe911 said:
scotty_917 said:
Similar performance from a 959 and far more practical....to carry your bits'n'pieces to your holiday home! Keep it's value better to.

The numbers may be similar - the delivery is not.
Surely it's just a lightened boxster with a bit more poke and less baggage space!!!

ponkyporky

62 posts

248 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all


Also been thinking about this the technology/parts creep is knocking this one. I'm down for the self shifter you mentioned.

Its a case of the 959 factor of having the top of the tree unit and a new technology/design piece item at a given point in time, but it has steep slide in benefit as the 'lesser' units get bits from the 'Halo' model to lift the commercial sales of the mainstream units, All at the expense of those who should not be to hurt by it anyway.

The question in a year or so's time is to choose one or the other of the following: new Turbo Cab fully specced at circa £115,000 and £100-130K (or 997 RS and 25k - 55K cash)in the bank or CGT?

Time we got the poll thingy on PH.

johnfm

13,751 posts

278 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
Johhny McGPipe

Have you been in a CGT? I had the pleasure of an outrageous fast lap at the hands of a Porsche test driver at Leipzig. Before that day, I was not overly impressed with the CGT. It is pretty amazing. The throttle response must be incredible, as the carbon clutch and very light flywheel etc give the internals very low inertia. Hearing it blip up & down the revs is amazing.

I don't think I would buy one at that price, but would love the engine in my GT3!!!

vpr

3,922 posts

266 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
JamieBeeston said:
the same 0-60 does not make it the same performance.

the Carrera GT is a Supercar.

The 997TT is a Super car


Is a 997TT a supercar?........What is the definition of a supercar. I would agree, it's a, "super" car but not so sure if its the other?

johnnywishbone

1,171 posts

250 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
THE SOUND OF THEM IS TOTALLY F---ING BRILLIANT !!!
WORTH IT JUST FOR THAT !!!!

JWB

Don

28,378 posts

312 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
I have had the honour of having been on track in my Boxster S at the same time as a beautiful silver Carrera GT.

I followed it for several corners - enjoying and appreciating this superb, superlative Supercar. I delighted in seeing it take Paddock Hill Bend and Druid's at Brands Hatch before I overtook it on the way towards Clearways...



Of COURSE he wasn't trying!

But really. If you get to have a good nose around one - they are utterly beautiful. And if people look at the dash and the steering wheel and think - "Hmmmn 986 Boxster S bits" - stuff it. Its nice to know that if I win the lottery and can afford one I'll feel right at home...

Splendid vehicle.

nbetts

1,455 posts

257 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
If you have heard the GT being used in anger it is a monumetal sound...real spine tingling stuff.

I love this car and if I ever ever get lucky enough to afford one... I would not hesitate.

911 Turbos are fantastic and I hope Porsche keeps evolving the 911tt for a long while yet... sure they will make it faster than a GT eventually if not already... but that GT is (for me anyway) a bit of motoring magic.

If anyone has one and would like to lend it to me for a quick go (say to Nice and back) that would be nice...

scotty_917

1,034 posts

250 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
johnnywishbone said:
THE SOUND OF THEM IS TOTALLY F---ING BRILLIANT !!!
WORTH IT JUST FOR THAT !!!!

JWB
I'd agree with that. A guy who lives 2 doors away from me has one...was being unloaded from a truck, that had just come back from Reading on a parts warranty replacement...does sound like one of the all time great engines!!!

anniesdad

14,589 posts

266 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
scotty_917 said:
Surely it's just a lightened boxster with a bit more poke and less baggage space!!!


And there's nowt wrong with that!

Are you 911 boys bothered about the CGT because it is/was the Daddy of the range and the fact its engine is in the proper place?

runs and hides for cover.

anniesdad

14,589 posts

266 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
johnnywishbone said:
THE SOUND OF THEM IS TOTALLY F---ING BRILLIANT !!!
WORTH IT JUST FOR THAT !!!!

JWB


Do you have to shout all the time? As I said, you've already knackered my ears up blasting past me leaving Vue cinema!

johnnywishbone

1,171 posts

250 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
WHAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!! sorry mate bit mutton jeff !!!


JWB

pocty

1,128 posts

307 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
A mate of mine has got a lovely CGT in Silver, its world apart from my X50
i''d liken the CGT to an F1 car it's miles different to the my turbo, believe me.

Philo

wildoliver

9,294 posts

244 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
Iv heard a rumour that it doesnt suffer from RMS either............

bumcrack

977 posts

293 months

Friday 12th May 2006
quotequote all
johnny g-pipe said:
C-GT: Same performance as the self shifting 997TT, same seats as the GT3, funny lookin', dodgy clutch, dodgy residuals...why would you bother?! A 964RS and a holiday home in the Eiffel mountains would be a much cooler use of the cash..


0-60 times are such an outdated concept with modern sports car, it doesn't give you any really comparison of a cars performance these days. 0-150 should be the standard quote, and then you might appreciate the difference on paper.