americans
Author
Discussion

rimmer

Original Poster:

6,689 posts

236 months

Friday 27th April 2007
quotequote all
[/quote]
why is it on porsches over in america they always that those either side of the number plate?


Edited by rimmer on Friday 27th April 21:05

freedman

6,018 posts

237 months

Friday 27th April 2007
quotequote all
rimmer said:

why is it on porsches over in america they always that those either side of the number plate?


Edited by rimmer on Friday 27th April 21:05
[/quote]

Its the law

///ajd

8,964 posts

236 months

Friday 27th April 2007
quotequote all
This is a guess - but it maybe related as stated above to the impact bumper laws in US - these require all cars to withstand a 5mph (?) impact without any damage to the car. I think this is the legislation that led to Saab and Porsche having the "bellows" in the bumpers in the 70s. I suspect that the reason why newer cars use the "soft bumper bits" next to the number plate is that this is the simplest way to meet this daft US legislation without major changes to the design of the fully smoothed colour coded integrated bumper designs.


Edited by ///ajd on Saturday 28th April 18:54

adam b

29,738 posts

284 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
///ajd said:
This is a guess - but it maybe related as stated above to the impact bumper laws in US -


correct, has ruined the looks of many a nice car

loach

3,357 posts

246 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
adam b said:
///ajd said:
This is a guess - but it maybe related as stated above to the impact bumper laws in US -


correct, has ruined the looks of many a nice car



True. Check out things like US versions of the E24 BMW 6-series. Yuk. I find it far more disheartening, though, to note that the Americans are now getting things like the GT3RS at all, as evidenced by the picture above. I can't quite articulate why I find this dismaying, but I do a bit. Totally unfairly, granted - I know there's no shortage of die-hard car nuts on the other side of the Atlantic, but... Boooo. I always sort of liked the idea that we got to keep all the 'hard' stuff to ourselves. Most of the desirable, rare and expensive classic gear makes its way there eventually, hoovered up as it is by wealthy US collectors. It was sort of comforting to have all the nicest gear to ourselves for a bit whilst it was new, and before it became too expensive for us to hang on to. Nothing against Americans at all.... but still...

rimmer

Original Poster:

6,689 posts

236 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
thanks for tht because i have wondered for a while

nervous

24,050 posts

260 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
loach said:
Nothing against Americans at all.... but still...


what about ones from alabama?

bob1179

14,139 posts

239 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
nervous said:
loach said:
Nothing against Americans at all.... but still...


what about ones from alabama?



Squeal little piggy...

loach

3,357 posts

246 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
nervous said:
loach said:
Nothing against Americans at all.... but still...


what about ones from alabama?



Hate 'em.

wetwipe

3,019 posts

243 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
loach said:
adam b said:
///ajd said:
This is a guess - but it maybe related as stated above to the impact bumper laws in US -


correct, has ruined the looks of many a nice car



True. Check out things like US versions of the E24 BMW 6-series. Yuk. I find it far more disheartening, though, to note that the Americans are now getting things like the GT3RS at all, as evidenced by the picture above. I can't quite articulate why I find this dismaying, but I do a bit. Totally unfairly, granted - I know there's no shortage of die-hard car nuts on the other side of the Atlantic, but... Boooo. I always sort of liked the idea that we got to keep all the 'hard' stuff to ourselves. Most of the desirable, rare and expensive classic gear makes its way there eventually, hoovered up as it is by wealthy US collectors. It was sort of comforting to have all the nicest gear to ourselves for a bit whilst it was new, and before it became too expensive for us to hang on to. Nothing against Americans at all.... but still...


i find it quite funny really

pork builds a high performance lightweight gt3, spending lots of cash in the process shaving weight here and there only then for the car to be exported to the USA to be driven by fat men called hank and earl

softinthehead

1,550 posts

269 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
nervous said:
loach said:
Nothing against Americans at all.... but still...


what about ones from alabama?


so which one is you, boy? you a queer or a steer?

welshnobby

1,201 posts

273 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
...it's just a futile addition anyway as the 5mph impact that the yanks may encounter in a gt3rs will be with a f@ck off gas guzzling 3tonne SUV/pickup...so by my reckoning they have placed the impact bumpers 3ft too low laugh

///ajd

8,964 posts

236 months

Saturday 28th April 2007
quotequote all
welshnobby said:
...it's just a futile addition anyway as the 5mph impact that the yanks may encounter in a gt3rs will be with a f@ck off gas guzzling 3tonne SUV/pickup...so by my reckoning they have placed the impact bumpers 3ft too low laugh


very true - I remember being told the law was actually introduced/designed to help protect car owners from having to pay expensive repair bills from small minor impacts (is this right?) - if so, as you say, the result in this case will be that a hugh SUV will actually miss the "bumpers" and smash up your nice carbon GT3RS spoiler - which costs heaven knows what - $4k?? Not really in the spirit of what the law was trying to achieve!!!