The Ten Grand Boxster
The Ten Grand Boxster
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

85 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
Any thoughts anyone?
Anyone done it?
I must say I'm tempted, ok they are the very base model, but from what I've seen, what a lovely car for the money.
I won't mention RMS, there is enough on this forum elsewhere.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

260 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
as long as it has a FSH.

Has been looked after.

Get a good inspection.

(warranty?)

Should be a good buy, and pretty depreciation proof?

runnersp

1,061 posts

251 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
I've started seeing a few for about €15k (that equates to roughly £10k). I've never been a huge fan of the Boxster, but to be honest they are really starting to look appealing at that price.

Adam B

29,761 posts

285 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
£10k for a 2.5 so are 2.7 down to 13-14k yet? I would always get the 2.7 which has reasonable performance.

But yes, lot of car for the money, even the 2.5 sounds lovely and handles well

The Griffalo

72,863 posts

270 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
as long as it has a FSH.

Has been looked after.

Get a good inspection.

(warranty?)

Should be a good buy, and pretty depreciation proof?
A warranty on a £10K car? yikes At that sort of money it's almost disposable wink

Buy one. If it goes bang spend the money on a replacement uber engine instead and enjoy biggrin

sleep envy

62,260 posts

280 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
2.5 car with GT3 engine???

Rob, get yer spanners out!

runnersp

1,061 posts

251 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
2.5 car with GT3 engine???

Rob, get yer spanners out!
Oh dear. That does sound rather appealing, such a shame that the last time I opened my wallet cartoon butterflies came out...

sleep envy

62,260 posts

280 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
Thinking about it it might even be posssible to do it cheaper than £10k i.e. 2.5 Boxster with engine failure (there must be a few floating about with dodgy spec and odd colour to keep the costs down) plus a std 3.6 911 engine...


Fidgits

17,202 posts

260 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
runnersp said:
sleep envy said:
2.5 car with GT3 engine???

Rob, get yer spanners out!
Oh dear. That does sound rather appealing, such a shame that the last time I opened my wallet cartoon butterflies came out...
I did a boxster with a GT2 engine...

this was, of course on Forza 2 computer game wink but it rendered it practically undriveable hehe

Essential

1,083 posts

241 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
A friend in the trade bought a 2.5 for £7500 recently.

High miler with history and yes the engine was in the back and working

The Griffalo

72,863 posts

270 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Thinking about it it might even be posssible to do it cheaper than £10k i.e. 2.5 Boxster with engine failure (there must be a few floating about with dodgy spec and odd colour to keep the costs down) plus a std 3.6 911 engine...
yeslick

It would be light and powerful, just like a TVR paperbagwink

Essential

1,083 posts

241 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
A friend in the trade bought a 2.5 for £7500 recently.

High miler with history and yes the engine was in the back and working

sleep envy

62,260 posts

280 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
The Griffalo said:
sleep envy said:
Thinking about it it might even be posssible to do it cheaper than £10k i.e. 2.5 Boxster with engine failure (there must be a few floating about with dodgy spec and odd colour to keep the costs down) plus a std 3.6 911 engine...
yeslick

It would be light and powerful, just like a TVR paperbagwink
it would also go round bends just unlike a TVR biglaugh

The Griffalo

72,863 posts

270 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
The Griffalo said:
sleep envy said:
Thinking about it it might even be posssible to do it cheaper than £10k i.e. 2.5 Boxster with engine failure (there must be a few floating about with dodgy spec and odd colour to keep the costs down) plus a std 3.6 911 engine...
yeslick

It would be light and powerful, just like a TVR paperbagwink
it would also go round bends just unlike a TVR biglaugh
You do have a point there biggrin

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

85 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
Adam B said:
£10k for a 2.5 so are 2.7 down to 13-14k yet? I would always get the 2.7 which has reasonable performance.

But yes, lot of car for the money, even the 2.5 sounds lovely and handles well
Just seen a 2000 2.7 for 13.5k on autotrader

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

85 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
Why all this talk of engine failure???
I was reading that the main problem with alot of Boxsters was RMS letting by a bit of oil, and if you're unlucky, wear on the intermediate crank bearing (or was it the intermediate shaft bearing?).

sleep envy

62,260 posts

280 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
sjwright944 said:
Why all this talk of engine failure???
because it's pointless buying a Boxster with working engines if you decide to drop a bigger/more powerful flat 6 into it

runnersp

1,061 posts

251 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
A used 3.6 engine is €5k on Van Zweeden's website. All I need now is a broken Boxster, how straightforward is the swap?

sleep envy

62,260 posts

280 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
total speculation but I'd imagine the oily/plumbing bits will be striaghtforward although the wiring and subframe/chassis work will require some expertise

runnersp

1,061 posts

251 months

Tuesday 3rd July 2007
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
total speculation but I'd imagine the oily/plumbing bits will be striaghtforward although the wiring and subframe/chassis work will require some expertise
scratchchin Most interesting, I can't really afford to have two Porsches both with bent engines, but as soon as the 911's done I might just give this some thought...