1/4 mile time/0-60mph - Cayman S
1/4 mile time/0-60mph - Cayman S
Author
Discussion

K Man S

Original Poster:

175 posts

241 months

Thursday 16th August 2007
quotequote all
I doubt many are that interested in the Cayman S's 1/4 time as there's more important things that matter during the Porsche driving experience, HOWEVER lick , a friend of mine has recently bought a Performance Box from Race Logic and i managed an 11.3 seconds (and a 5.2 to 60mph) which i thought was very respectable. He did 10.4 (and 4.8) in his Z4M. These data machines are accurate to millionths of seconds so i guess you can't argue with the data (a flat road as well by the way and with a passenger (we'd also both just had a curry lol) bow ). Anyone else managed to time their pride and joy?

headlesshorseman

619 posts

237 months

Thursday 16th August 2007
quotequote all
11.3 secs quarter seems a bit fast for a cayman more like tt teritory or am i wrong.

longbow

1,610 posts

266 months

Thursday 16th August 2007
quotequote all
Not a chance!! 11.3 is like McLaren F1 territory laugh

More like about 13.5 - 14.0 seconds for a Cayman S or similar

Wanta996(Gotta)

5,622 posts

238 months

Thursday 16th August 2007
quotequote all
2004 Porsche Carrera GT 11.12 @ 133.4

Are you sure it was quarter mile and not 0-100mph?

SunDiver

780 posts

268 months

Thursday 16th August 2007
quotequote all
Unrealistic for 1/4 mile unless it's heavily modified or it was significantly downhill. 13.X would be the real figure on a good day with a good driver for a genuine level 1/4 mile. 0-60 time is plausible if all goes well...

Ultra Violent

2,827 posts

300 months

Thursday 16th August 2007
quotequote all
10.4 in a Z4M. Er, no.

Bumcrack

977 posts

296 months

Thursday 16th August 2007
quotequote all
Porsches official figure for the Cayman S from zero to hundred is 11.5 seconds, so it’s more likely your friend meant 0-100 rather than 1/4 mile

Brett928S2

1,504 posts

246 months

Friday 17th August 2007
quotequote all
Hi smile

I think hes set up the Race logic box incorrectly...

To give a comparison...10 secs dead on the quarter @ 147 mph....= Veyron..

My 928 On Nitrous needs over 800 hp to get into the 10s or 11s....

All the best Brett smile

edinandrew

209 posts

234 months

Monday 20th August 2007
quotequote all
Was flicking through an old autocar and they clocked 0-100 in 11 secs. Thet're usually pretty accurate and use similar equipment to test. Defo 0-100 though and not 1/4 mile .... sorry.

hartech

1,929 posts

248 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
The tester must have been set up wrong.

We have a technician with a 1.4 Renault Turbo sprinter - huge turbo and intercooler, Nitros injection, special tyres etc and it does 11.9 and 120mph for the quarter (one of the fastest ever) but he says that is about as quick as the best GT3's and quicker than any 911 turbo he has come accross.

Many on car testers will also give a false reading if the tyres spin as they often read the increase in wheel speed as acceleration and cannot sense the spin (although I don't know how this particular one works).

Baz

Stu R

21,701 posts

246 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
0-60 in 5.2 seconds and you believe it did a 1/4 mile in 11? hehe
You'll be lucky to see high 12's at between 105 and 110 trap speed, never mind low 11's in a standard
Cayman S.


USS Bozeman

1,084 posts

253 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
hartech said:
but he says that is about as quick as the best GT3's and quicker than any 911 turbo he has come accross.
Baz
But Turbo's are faster than GT3's......

Dave 500

7,886 posts

273 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Cayman S will be mid to high 13's can't see it getting into the 12's wink

996TT_STEVO

4,078 posts

259 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
LMFAO

I clocked 11.6 sec and trapped at 128mph and the Cayman can match that, mmmmmm, NOT!

Think it will be 0 to 100 for sure, This was my figures and Data File verified!

Best 0-60 was 3.6 sec | Best 0-100 was 7.5 sec | Best 1/4 Mile was 11.6 sec | Best 60-130 was 8.3 sec (this is kick down from 50mph)

Wanta996(Gotta)

5,622 posts

238 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Hi Steve,

Is that standard 996 TT times? Seems very quick.

And do you know what my C4S times would be? My old Evo,Autocar and Top Gear magazines seem to differ?

Edited by Wanta996(Gotta) on Tuesday 21st August 10:31

Pat Cash

312 posts

261 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
Cayman S official time is 13.6s. (14.1) for standing 1/4 mile and 0-160km/h is 11.7 (13.5).

Edited by Pat Cash on Tuesday 21st August 13:16

Pat Cash

312 posts

261 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
K Man S said:
These data machines are accurate to millionths of seconds so i guess you can't argue with the data
As far as I understand it, the performance box samples at 10Hz - ie 10 times a second. Thus can't realistically be any more accurate that 0.1 of a second.

flatfour

309 posts

259 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
With a 10 Hz sample, best accuracy would be 1/2 sample rate at 0.2 Seconds assuming a perfect measurement.Allowing for device accuracy of 1 measurement, I would not expect greater than +/- 0.4 Seconds accuracy overall.

J

996TT_STEVO

4,078 posts

259 months

Tuesday 21st August 2007
quotequote all
[quote=Wanta996(Gotta)]Hi Steve,

Is that standard 996 TT times? Seems very quick.

And do you know what my C4S times would be? My old Evo,Autocar and Top Gear magazines seem to differ?

Edited by Wanta996(Gotta) on Tuesday 21st August 10:31

[/quote]

No that is not stock times.