Safe RPM for a 3.6 964 C2 engine?
Safe RPM for a 3.6 964 C2 engine?
Author
Discussion

LuckyP

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

249 months

Wednesday 21st May 2008
quotequote all
Had a replacement lump in put in the C2 and am finally back on the road. Is it good practice to take the car up to the Rev limit as the thing just wants to pull and pull up past 6000, or should I be taking it easy with the old gal and changing around 6?

Just need to know before her next track day.

Cheers

Pete


boxsey

3,579 posts

234 months

Wednesday 21st May 2008
quotequote all
I know what you mean. I found myself hitting the rev limiter quite easily on the first trackday I used the old girl on. Since then I decided changing up at 6K is probably more sympathetic and less stressful in the long term.

964RS.

238 posts

223 months

Wednesday 21st May 2008
quotequote all
Max rev limit is 6,700RPM +/- 20 but you should be changing at 6100RPM as this is the threshold of maximum power.

thegoose

8,077 posts

234 months

Wednesday 21st May 2008
quotequote all
964RS. said:
Max rev limit is 6,700RPM +/- 20 but you should be changing at 6100RPM as this is the threshold of maximum power.
Shouldn't where you'll sit in the power band in the next gear also influence the revs you change up at?

964RS.

238 posts

223 months

Wednesday 21st May 2008
quotequote all
Agreed. A lot to be said for red-lining to allow for the inevitable drop off in revs to get the power in the next gear up. However in this thread I would air caution and have a little mechanical sympathy.

LuckyP

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

249 months

Wednesday 21st May 2008
quotequote all
thegoose said:
964RS. said:
Max rev limit is 6,700RPM +/- 20 but you should be changing at 6100RPM as this is the threshold of maximum power.
Shouldn't where you'll sit in the power band in the next gear also influence the revs you change up at?
I appreciate that at each change RPM should be accurately calculated to allow best RPM in the following ratio, but 964RS is right, for me it's about keeping the car in one piece and enjoying the trackday biggrin.

6100(ish) changes for me then. Ta.

Cheers

Lucky

Greg964

1,179 posts

262 months

Wednesday 21st May 2008
quotequote all
Glad to hear the car is running again Pete.

LuckyP

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

249 months

Wednesday 21st May 2008
quotequote all
I thought I'd treat it to a weekend at the ring as a penance for blowing up on me!!

tony.t

927 posts

280 months

Thursday 22nd May 2008
quotequote all
I can't really see what damage you expect to occur by running into the rev limiter.
My experience of 964 engines on track is that the power begins to drop off before the limiter and that's the time to shift gear but it's still pulling hard at 6000rpm and it's a waste of available power to shift that early.

christer

2,804 posts

275 months

Thursday 22nd May 2008
quotequote all
tony.t said:
I can't really see what damage you expect to occur by running into the rev limiter.
My experience of 964 engines on track is that the power begins to drop off before the limiter and that's the time to shift gear but it's still pulling hard at 6000rpm and it's a waste of available power to shift that early.
/agreed

964RS.

238 posts

223 months

Saturday 24th May 2008
quotequote all
Did Croft on Thursday and always changed up at 6700 (max) but the engine has only done 60k km and is like new. Does eek out the extra power to humble a few new Porsches.

LeoSayer

7,687 posts

268 months

Saturday 24th May 2008
quotequote all
It's not a proper drive unless I take my 993 up to 6700rpm at least once per trip.

I honestly believe you are doing the car a favour by revving them to the limit, they are built to be thrashed.

HAB

3,632 posts

251 months

Saturday 24th May 2008
quotequote all
Regularly take my C2 over 6k, road (where permitting) & track : the engine just feels unburstable, always seems to go better after a hard run.


ChrisW.

8,046 posts

279 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
I also take the view that the red line is there to be used --- and it should be a safe limit.

But it also depends upon the gear spacing, I have a 7.5 ton truck and the gearbox seems to be in two halves --- 1 and 2 work low, 3, 4 and 5 work high --- so a double declutch down to 2nd from 3rd is always a bit of a surprise ... and care is required.

And surely that's the point on over-revving, it's not going up the box that's the issue, it's coming down.

melv

4,708 posts

289 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
6800 poss max revs for most, my Cup will rev to 7200 but, as posted above, with the torque of these engines, an upshift at 6000-6500 seems to keep it buzzing over the 5K mark.

PhilRS

264 posts

255 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
For max performance, the engine should always be kept between max torque and max power.

To save the engine, I always upshift around 6.200 rpm. As posted many times above torque (which is acceleration) is strong , so there is little point to go to the rev limiter unless racing, to save an unnecessarily short upshift just before a braking point.

BTW, this video illustrates those "early" upshifts... I just let the engine go past 6,200 in the Kemel straight...

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SMbAN6nDuQ0



Edited by PhilRS on Monday 26th May 15:17

LuckyP

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

249 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
Great lap!! Not only the best looking 911 but the best sounding and fairly quick too!!

LeoSayer

7,687 posts

268 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
PhilRS said:
For max performance, the engine should always be kept between max torque and max power.
Not sure I agree with that. Whilst the power will drop away above 6200rpm, you are still getting much more bhp at 6200-6700rpm that than at 4000-4500rpm.

NineMeister

1,146 posts

282 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
In any gear, maximum acceleration occurs when you keep the rpm of the engine in the widest possible average power area of the power band - in mathematical terms you are looking for the maximum "area under the curve". Interestingly every naturally aspirated 911 engine I have ever dyno tested has its peak power occuring within 800rpm of its rev limit, so irrespective of where peak torque occurs, what this means in practise is that you need to take to engine up to (but not into) the rev limiter in every gear in order to use that maximum area.

So, why not use lower revs and use the torque? In laymans terms, torque represents the size of the bang in the cylinder, whereas power is the cumulative effect of bangs per second, so although at peak torque the bangs are bigger, at peak power the higher frequency of slightly smaller bangs will win the race.

With respect to the 964 engine, the safe working rpm is 6800 and my recommendation is not to exceed this limit, but by all means use it as often as you like as no harm will come to your engine as a result.

Edited by NineMeister on Monday 26th May 23:17