Tuscan "S" Specification
Tuscan "S" Specification
Author
Discussion

MoreSteam

Original Poster:

698 posts

219 months

Wednesday 9th December 2009
quotequote all
Hi Folks,

Could you tell me what is on an S spec Tuscan 2 over a standard Tuscan? Also, is the engine always a 4.0, or are there 3.6 S's about.

Cheers

Andy Pandie

1,165 posts

238 months

Wednesday 9th December 2009
quotequote all
As taken from http://www.mytuscan.co.uk

"The S has a bigger bore engine outputting more BHP than the standard (380-400 rather than 350-360). There are various other engine tweaks and are considered to be a little bit more robust.

The S version comes with a Hydratrak limited slip differential, close-ratio gearbox, gas discharge lights, airconditioning, a better suspension setup, it's lighter, has larger brakes up front, a DAB radio and external ariel, plus a front splitter and rear spoiler. The lights at the back are also placed differently to the standard model with the rear indicators being in the spoiler rather than LEDs at the top of the window and the brakelights higher on the rear."

On the MkII the rear lights are the same for all variants, and they are all fitted with a rear spoiler. The Tuscan S only came with a 4.0 lump.

Hope that helps.


glow worm

7,406 posts

256 months

Wednesday 9th December 2009
quotequote all
£10k.....But the full spec includes CR box/Air Con/'S' Engine incl different injectors...but getting them depends what was available at the time. Not totally sure on the internals between a non S and S , but and S is the same as a Sag engine....TVR owner will disagree....Probably minor difference in the exhaust manifold size...but again seems to depends on bits available at the time.

PS The diff was also pot luck. 3:46 (normally) , should be 3:73 or 3:91 with CR box...but bits not always available.

PPS A small or large rear spoiler was always an option, front winglets std. on an S. Plus a RED cam cover of course.

PPS Forgot S has different rear springs and setup is harder.







Edited by glow worm on Wednesday 9th December 19:40

alinton

965 posts

265 months

Wednesday 9th December 2009
quotequote all
My Mk 1 'S' does not have winglets or a red cam cover.

I thought the winglets were only on the Mk2, and the cam cover was 'you get what you're given'!

A.

glow worm

7,406 posts

256 months

Wednesday 9th December 2009
quotequote all
Factory supplied painted cam covers only came in 2004/2005. Red S,Blue std., Black 3.6 ...before that most were unpainted. The question related to MK2 S's , I assume relative to a MK2 non S. Only a few (about 5) 3.6 Mk2s. Markotvrs is one, yes all S's are 4 litre.


Edited by glow worm on Thursday 10th December 00:05

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

220 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
glow worm said:
but and S is the same as a Sag engine....TVR owner will disagree....Probably minor difference in the exhaust manifold size...but again seems to depends on bits available at the time.
Not at all, I think you have given a good appraisal of what was what. smile

The Pits

4,290 posts

269 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
3.6 tuscans are plenty quick enough for most

but you know you want an 'S' wink

The 3.6 is sweeter but the 4.0S is more growly, mean and beastly (which most prefer)

I thought the 3.6 was stroked to get to 4.0? Hence lower revs (7800 vs 8200).

as such the S is reckoned to be worth at least another 20bhp but being stroked the gains in torque are better still (from 290 to 315ftlbs).

Certainly the 3.6s only really get going over 5000 rpm whereas the 4.0S's stride begins at 4.

MoreSteam

Original Poster:

698 posts

219 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
This is why I was asking. He says its definitely an S

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1151931.htm

Seems a bit suspicious.

Edited by MoreSteam on Thursday 10th December 17:46

The Pits

4,290 posts

269 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Either it's not a 3.6 or it's not an S.

One of them is wrong. Classified ads are well known for their inaccuracies.

One dealer is advertising a Gallardo as having a 5 litre V12!

TUS64N

92 posts

270 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
The car is defo an 's' it used to belong to a lawyer chappie who worked in dunfermline spoke to him many times, i'm sure he bought it new, Alan knows his TVR's must be a typo

NCE 61

2,457 posts

310 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
V5's also sometimes show the engine capacity incorrectly.Could be the dealer just used that information for his advert.

GT TVR

1,627 posts

311 months

Friday 11th December 2009
quotequote all
MoreSteam said:
This is why I was asking. He says its definitely an S

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1151931.htm

Seems a bit suspicious.

Edited by MoreSteam on Thursday 10th December 17:46
Looked at it myself, it's definitely an S. But be careful, it's an ex-rental car.

so called

9,160 posts

238 months

Friday 11th December 2009
quotequote all
If its ex-rental it didnt do many miles and if its still tidy I wouldnt be so concerned.
OK it may not have had the recommended warm up but how do you quantify that other than do a thorough engine inspection.
There is also the argument about it being used as aposed to it sitting in a garage.

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

220 months

Friday 11th December 2009
quotequote all
so called said:
If its ex-rental it didnt do many miles and if its still tidy I wouldnt be so concerned.
OK it may not have had the recommended warm up but how do you quantify that other than do a thorough engine inspection.
There is also the argument about it being used as aposed to it sitting in a garage.
I think the answer is you assume - probably quite correctly, that it hasn't been properly warmed up and give it a wide berth because you can expect engine problems that won't be properly warrented.

Abused vs sat in Garage....difficult one that.

JR

14,332 posts

287 months

Friday 11th December 2009
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
Abused vs sat in Garage....difficult one that.
One for NTB?

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

220 months

Friday 11th December 2009
quotequote all
JR said:
TVR_owner said:
Abused vs sat in Garage....difficult one that.
One for NTB?
confused
Sorry Johnathan, not understanding. What does NTB mean?

JR

14,332 posts

287 months

Friday 11th December 2009
quotequote all
Nick the Bassist, Speed 12 authority, 653etc, your fellow Yorkshireman.

Jonathan

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

220 months

Friday 11th December 2009
quotequote all
JR said:
Nick the Bassist, Speed 12 authority, 653etc, your fellow Yorkshireman.

Jonathan
Yes...I suspect it maybe. smile

Can I state on this forum that I am not a Yorkshireman nono I only live there when visiting the UK.

Can I also state that this was the case before NTB declared his domicile. hehe

TVR653X

1,042 posts

204 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
It's come to my attention, thanks to another PHer, that I, TVR653X, am being accussed of being this 'NTB' or Speed 12 Authority? Why is this? I'm not associated with either and have no idea who either of them are.

G1ABB

857 posts

233 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
This made me laugh! So your not Nick and you don't ask lots of questions about Speed 12's and you don't paste in links to pictures with a link including NtheB in the title.

I almost thought you were serious just for a second. Mind you I am on my third gottle of gear.

I'll shut up now... still laughing.. and yes I can't take my gear, I mean dear Oh sod it... Beer.


TVR653X said:
It's come to my attention, thanks to another PHer, that I, TVR653X, am being accussed of being this 'NTB' or Speed 12 Authority? Why is this? I'm not associated with either and have no idea who either of them are.