Particulate filters what a joke
Particulate filters what a joke
Author
Discussion

Gary11

Original Poster:

4,162 posts

218 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Quite amusing,the new "Euro" diesel particulate filters,(the one that if not fitted to a diesel engine prevents access to the city or any low emmision zone) are apparently now required to be retro fitted to early commercial vehicles for the sum of £1400!
These contraptions on older engines block up and cause bad running and poor emmisions.....the fix?......do a few miles at 50-70mph in a low gear to clear them out,you couldnt make it up,hence releasing all the carcogenic particulates back into the air again,unbeliveable.

Edited by Gary11 on Tuesday 8th November 11:51

jagracer

8,248 posts

253 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
What private vehicles do they have to be fitted to and in which country is this?

Gary11

Original Poster:

4,162 posts

218 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
jagracer said:
What private vehicles do they have to be fitted to and in which country is this?
Sorry the post is confusing the vehicle which prompted the post was a L200 which was debateable whether its classification was private or commercial and is related to its date of reg also my mistake!

However give them time!

Laurel Green

30,940 posts

249 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
I thought it was only those that did short journeys whom were advised to do this. I also think it is not to clear the particulates out, but to burn them off with sufficient heat to the filter.

eybic

9,212 posts

191 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
I thought it was only those that did short journeys whom were advised to do this. I also think it is not to clear the particulates out, but to burn them off with sufficient heat to the filter.
This is correct.

Gary11

Original Poster:

4,162 posts

218 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Sorry this was qualified by the cloud of smoke exiting the exhaust the particulate doesnt just dissapear.
Its not so bad on common rail newer engines but when retro fitted to older engines that are a bit tired thats when you may get an issue,
G

jagracer

8,248 posts

253 months

Tuesday 8th November 2011
quotequote all
Gary11 said:
jagracer said:
What private vehicles do they have to be fitted to and in which country is this?
Sorry the post is confusing the vehicle which prompted the post was a L200 which was debateable whether its classification was private or commercial and is related to its date of reg also my mistake!

However give them time!
There is the same problem with certain Land Rovers such as Discos and Defenders etc, exactly the same vehicles can be non compliant just because of how they are registered. As you say, give them time and I think most diesels will be included.

snapdragon69

207 posts

200 months

Sunday 20th November 2011
quotequote all
In some German cities they already have this (After all it is based on EU regulations)
They have red, orange or green tax-disc sized stickers in the windscreen that you have to pay for every year. There are signs at the side of the road denoting which colour disc is allowed past.

I see the same signs around London for larger vehicles are now in use (after spending several years covered up)

DPFs are very unreliable, but when retrofitted (and so not well integrated) to older vehicles they are a complete disaster as the engines are old and not designed to work with them, so smoke more to start with and also have no forced regeneration regime in the ECU.

Gary11

Original Poster:

4,162 posts

218 months

Sunday 20th November 2011
quotequote all
snapdragon69 said:
In some German cities they already have this (After all it is based on EU regulations)
They have red, orange or green tax-disc sized stickers in the windscreen that you have to pay for every year. There are signs at the side of the road denoting which colour disc is allowed past.

I see the same signs around London for larger vehicles are now in use (after spending several years covered up)

DPFs are very unreliable, but when retrofitted (and so not well integrated) to older vehicles they are a complete disaster as the engines are old and not designed to work with them, so smoke more to start with and also have no forced regeneration regime in the ECU.
Ive also heard of certain "types" hacking them off as @ £1500 a pop they are very sellable and not (at present) id marked!!

VPower

3,598 posts

211 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
Some of the lads at work have chipped their oil burnes and say they pull better, run cleaner no longer blowing black soot and use less fuel!

One said his Dad's 407 started to bog down, so he took off the exhaut and steam cleaned it out.
That cured it apparently and loads of black crap was washed out!


eddie1980

419 posts

205 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
Steam cleaning and then air blasting DPF's is actually quite a common "fix" especially on french cars.

rswift

1,181 posts

192 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
On my Wifes' old diesel C5, we had 'Anti-pollution fault errors. I took the DPF off, knocked the insides out, (10 minutes with a masonry drill/old trolley jack handle & a hammer). Refitted. Luckily I have a mate with a copy of the Peugeot/Citroen computer prog & leads (£100 off ebay should you wish to buy one) We simply plugged in and turned the option that said "DPF Present" to OFF. Since then, about 6k, the car goes better, does 5MPG more & has passed an MOT. It is a 2001 car, probably one of the first diesel cars with a dpf in the UK.

This is a 100k mile car, that spends its' life on the motorway, not doing city driving.

This is what it looks like gutted, the bin liner contains the insides, it is a brick like substance.



Edited by rswift on Saturday 10th December 03:02

heebeegeetee

29,658 posts

265 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
Gary11 said:
Quite amusing,the new "Euro" diesel particulate filters,(the one that if not fitted to a diesel engine prevents access to the city or any low emmision zone) are apparently now required to be retro fitted to early commercial vehicles for the sum of £1400!
These contraptions on older engines block up and cause bad running and poor emmisions.....the fix?......do a few miles at 50-70mph in a low gear to clear them out,you couldnt make it up,hence releasing all the carcogenic particulates back into the air again,unbeliveable.

Edited by Gary11 on Tuesday 8th November 11:51
There is no evidence that the particulates are carcinogenic.

mad4amanda

2,410 posts

181 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
rswift said:
On my Wifes' old diesel C5, we had 'Anti-pollution fault errors. I took the DPF off, knocked the insides out, (10 minutes with a masonry drill/old trolley jack handle & a hammer). Refitted. Luckily I have a mate with a copy of the Peugeot/Citroen computer prog & leads (£100 off ebay should you wish to buy one) We simply plugged in and turned the option that said "DPF Present" to OFF. Since then, about 6k, the car goes better, does 5MPG more & has passed an MOT. It is a 2001 car, probably one of the first diesel cars with a dpf in the UK.

This is a 100k mile car, that spends its' life on the motorway, not doing city driving.

This is what it looks like gutted, the bin liner contains the insides, it is a brick like substance.



Edited by rswift on Saturday 10th December 03:02
The question now is will it pass an mot next year as this is one of the requirements being introduced , iI was astounded to be told by my garage (good indy ) a couple of weeks ago about the changes due.
the mot already includes OBD connector to interrogate the ECU for errors or allegedly "illegal" tweeks .

Gary11

Original Poster:

4,162 posts

218 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
eybic said:
This is correct.
Is that not the same? This residue is expelled to atmosphere by increased engine RPM generating extra heat and pressure the black smoke is clearly visible when doing this.

bazking69

8,620 posts

207 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
DPF's. More trouble than they are worth...

DSM2

3,624 posts

217 months

Sunday 11th December 2011
quotequote all
Gary11 said:
eybic said:
This is correct.
Is that not the same? This residue is expelled to atmosphere by increased engine RPM generating extra heat and pressure the black smoke is clearly visible when doing this.
No. The extra heat burns off the particulates, which are expelled as gas.

The clue is in the word 'particulate'.

If you think about it, it is obvious. The DPF are not catalytic nor do they permanently trap anything, just hold the particles until they burn off.

Fastdruid

9,111 posts

169 months

Sunday 11th December 2011
quotequote all
DSM2 said:
If you think about it, it is obvious. The DPF are not catalytic nor do they permanently trap anything, just hold the particles until they clog the filter and it has to be replaced at a cost of about £1000.
FTFY.

Still, serves all those idiots right who bought a diesel for their short journey town use 'because it gets better mpg'.

Gary11

Original Poster:

4,162 posts

218 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
DSM2 said:
No. The extra heat burns off the particulates, which are expelled as gas.

The clue is in the word 'particulate'.

If you think about it, it is obvious. The DPF are not catalytic nor do they permanently trap anything, just hold the particles until they burn off.
So in perpetuity the particulates of partially burnt carbon deposits (which are carcogenic like old engine oil)just dissapear never returning to the atmosphere,have you actually seen inside a clogged DPF on a tired old engine?

wooly350i

2,248 posts

225 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
And people home with me because I'm happy to keep my 22 year old petrol van on the road, these bloody eu rule makers must all have dimentia!