FULL UK congestion charging!
FULL UK congestion charging!
Author
Discussion

Crayven

Original Poster:

59 posts

260 months

Sunday 18th July 2004
quotequote all
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/040718/325/ey8s6.html

Looks like EVERYONE is gonna be screwed !

nonegreen

7,803 posts

292 months

Sunday 18th July 2004
quotequote all


Even the thickest twat on earth will not vote for that, bet Begg is behind it somewhere.

rico

7,917 posts

277 months

Sunday 18th July 2004
quotequote all
Insanity!

So they scrap road tax but still rinse us motorists for MORE money...

t*ssers

hertsbiker

6,443 posts

293 months

Sunday 18th July 2004
quotequote all
noooooooooooooo! I heard it can be up to £141 per WEEK extra to drive round London.

I'll need a £10K pay rise just to cover costs.

Christ. This sucks.

cpas

1,661 posts

262 months

Monday 19th July 2004
quotequote all
Why don't they just banish the road fund licence and put a few pence on petrol/diesel to cover it, then the more you use your car, the more you pay in 'tax'.

hornet

6,333 posts

272 months

Monday 19th July 2004
quotequote all
cpas said:
Why don't they just banish the road fund licence and put a few pence on petrol/diesel to cover it, then the more you use your car, the more you pay in 'tax'.


Because this way they have an excuse to put GPS tracking in every car....

Munter

31,330 posts

263 months

Monday 19th July 2004
quotequote all
hornet said:

cpas said:
Why don't they just banish the road fund licence and put a few pence on petrol/diesel to cover it, then the more you use your car, the more you pay in 'tax'.



Because this way they have an excuse to put GPS tracking in every car....


Thats exactly what I was thinking. However the GPS device may turn out to be faulty in a lot of cases...(remove place in microwave....2 mins full power should do it)

piccy mate

541 posts

259 months

Monday 19th July 2004
quotequote all
Hang on a mo - seems to me the media is scare mongering. :-)
Look at www.cfit.gov.uk/reports/pfru/01.htm which formed part of the Thinktank's proposals at:
www.ippr.org.uk/press/files/InthefastlaneJuly04.pdf

If you read carefully, you'll find that the press figures are overall running costs per mile for an urban cardriver - bit different from a congetsion charge of that amount
Quote
Julie Foley, an IPPR research fellow, backed a charging scheme using satellite tracking to increase the cost of driving in urban areas from 11.7p to 20.4p a kilometre. Drivers would incur higher charges for rush-hour journeys and cheaper fees for trips in rural areas.
Unquote
Now look at the time scale - ten years, at best, before it can be introduced.

I wouldn't get too wound up about for now - just remember it when you next vote!
David Butler

echo

178 posts

264 months

Tuesday 20th July 2004
quotequote all
cpas said:
Why don't they just banish the road fund licence and put a few pence on petrol/diesel to cover it, then the more you use your car, the more you pay in 'tax'.


Simple - the FTA would be up in arms. With no one paying car tax who would subsidise their industry?

Dan

1,068 posts

306 months

Tuesday 20th July 2004
quotequote all
cpas said:
Why don't they just banish the road fund licence and put a few pence on petrol/diesel to cover it, then the more you use your car, the more you pay in 'tax'.


A few more foppin' pence!!! dyu know how many pence they charge already!! 80 odd % of the pump price is foppin tax.

XM5ER

5,094 posts

270 months

Tuesday 20th July 2004
quotequote all
cpas said:
Why don't they just banish the road fund licence and put a few pence on petrol/diesel to cover it, then the more you use your car, the more you pay in 'tax'.


Thats the point though isn't it, we have a rise coming in September and there are moves afoot to have another protest. This is propaganda.

james_j

3,996 posts

277 months

Tuesday 20th July 2004
quotequote all
hornet said:

cpas said:
Why don't they just banish the road fund licence and put a few pence on petrol/diesel to cover it, then the more you use your car, the more you pay in 'tax'.



Because this way they have an excuse to put GPS tracking in every car....


Yep, I was thinking this too.

Why introduce a complex system to charge for use which just happens to enable monitoring, when we already have an existing system of usage charge in (very high) fuel taxes.

There must be a motive to introduce monitoring once the trojan horse has been wheeled into place.

Are the public really so stupid? Hell I hope not.

towman

14,938 posts

261 months

Wednesday 21st July 2004
quotequote all
echo said:

cpas said:
Why don't they just banish the road fund licence and put a few pence on petrol/diesel to cover it, then the more you use your car, the more you pay in 'tax'.



Simple - the FTA would be up in arms. With no one paying car tax who would subsidise their industry?


Are you aware of the cost of RFL for a 38 tonner?

echo

178 posts

264 months

Wednesday 21st July 2004
quotequote all
towman said:

Are you aware of the cost of RFL for a 38 tonner?


depends on the tractor type & emissions.

but whatever it is it wont be enough to pay for the damage they do to the roads without the top-up from the car users.

stewwy

1 posts

259 months

Wednesday 21st July 2004
quotequote all
Well just saw our Transport Overlord on Daily Politics on BBC. Before he came on they had some graphics up on screen 'explaining' the proposed new system, apparently you'll get a monthly bill through your letterbox " like the mobile phone bill you get now" detailing where and when you traveled and how much time you spent on the road .... Now how do I explain to my wife where I was, this'll really help the divorce rate!!!!

One way to kill this would be to require all politicians to post up their bills