RE: Illegal Speed Humps
RE: Illegal Speed Humps
Author
Discussion

bogbeast

Original Poster:

1,144 posts

285 months

Tuesday 24th August 2004
quotequote all
Anyone an Independant subscriber? Could they paste the whole article in here..

bogbeast

Original Poster:

1,144 posts

285 months

Tuesday 24th August 2004
quotequote all
Ah good ol' google cache..

Council is forced to adjust the height of illegal speed humps
By James Sturcke
07 August 2004

A builder has forced a council to alter the height of its speed humps because they flout traffic laws. Patrick Cawley, 43, measured a flat-top road hump at 160mm - 60mm above the legal maximum height.

It will cost Camden council in north London tens of thousands of pounds to correct the humps in West Hampstead.

Mr Cawley, of West Hampstead, said: "The council's got to act fast.

"Some humps are intolerable and are severe even at low speeds. When I first complained, the council told me it was no worse than going over a pothole. That is ridiculous."

The Department for Transport confirmed that the humps were too high. A spokesman said yesterday: "The legal limit for road humps is a maximum of 100mm."

Mr Cawley met Camden transport engineers at one hump and they agreed that it would have to be modified.

The setback could affect humps throughout Camden and the whole of London.The council has already said it will have to lower humps in Westbere Road where Mr Cawley has measured them at 240mm.

A Camden council spokeswoman said: "We will be bringing the humps down to 100mm. Subsidence on either side of the road is to blame for the humps being too high. The cost of the modifications has not been worked out yet." Speed humps cost up to £25,000 to install. A six-week programme of work will begin in late August to bring the humps into line with regulations laid out in the Highways (Road Humps) Regulations 1996.

Brian Coleman, the former environmental chief at Barnet council who started ripping out all speed humps in the borough, said: "If Camden spent all the tens of thousands of pounds they waste on road-widening, traffic-calming and other unnecessary anti-motorist measures on resurfacing the roads it would be far more efficient.

"The most upsetting thing is the way Camden's road safety team treat as of no importance the frail, the elderly and the handicapped. I am not against road safety but most of the work they are doing is illegal."

crankedup

25,764 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th August 2004
quotequote all
Like most Goverment agencies - waste other peoples money on waste of energy facilities.

WildfireS3

9,910 posts

274 months

Friday 27th August 2004
quotequote all
How do you effectively measure a speed hump?

reAnimate

418 posts

304 months

Friday 27th August 2004
quotequote all
More importantly, where is this legal limit stated in law so I can show it to the council?

reAnimate

418 posts

304 months

Friday 27th August 2004
quotequote all
More importantly, where is this legal limit stated in law so I can show it to the council?

iaint

10,040 posts

260 months

Friday 27th August 2004
quotequote all
According to the DfT spokesperson quoted above 100mm is the maximum height. So I would assume their website might, if you're luck and the wind's blowing the right way, have the relevant info.

like this (scroll down to 'road hump dimensions'.

Iain

>> Edited by iaint on Friday 27th August 14:29

>> Edited by iaint on Friday 27th August 14:41

Jack&MLE

626 posts

261 months

Tuesday 7th September 2004
quotequote all
Thanks gentlemen

I csn now go down the coucil and ask them to remove the new hump they just fitted in Kings Langley

Jack