RE: New Belt Laws

Friday 21st June 2002

New Belt Laws

Harmonisation of seat belt laws with exemption for 'large families'


Author
Discussion

JohnL

Original Poster:

1,763 posts

278 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
Why the delays for large families and school kids?

smeagol

1,947 posts

297 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
School transport is often by coach/bus which do not have seatbelts. Hope that answers the question.

CarZee

13,382 posts

280 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
most disposable.

Keep the fastbreeder-social-leech numbers down.

raceboy

13,402 posts

293 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
Didn't think any kids went to school by bus these days, they all seem to have their own Land Cruiser Taxi

Paceracing

729 posts

279 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
Anyone here know how the law stands re kids and the front seats?
The wife has an MX-5. What happens if we have kids, does she need to have a 4 - seater just so that you can put a child in the back?
I have seen a number of mums with baby cot thingys on the front seats but facing the other way, is this legal?
What happens when they are todlers, and the baby cot thingy is too big, can you put a child seat in the front for the 2+ year olds?

Jas.

JSG

2,238 posts

296 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
Jas,

I think the limitation on little kids in front seats is to do with air-bag recommendations than UK law. In many European countries kids under 14 (I think) can't travel in the front, I'm not sure if this is just when rear seats are available or if it rules out 2 seaters.

In the UK the child just has to be 'properly restrained'. My 5 year sits in the rear of my Audi due to the air bag but in the front of his mum's Defender.

His favourite seat is the front passenger seat of the V8S, with or without a booster seat .

Cheers,
JSG

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

275 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
Hmm, if your child is in a "proper" child seat ie a recaro, and is correctly belted into the child seat, and the passenger seat is "reasonably" adjusted IE NOT 2" from the dashboard, then WHY can't you have them in the front seat of an airbag equipped car??
Let's be honest, if you have an accident, the forces exerted will probably exceed any survival thresholds for a young child anyway..............front seat or back...........SO don't have one(accident)in the first place, and take your place in the great game of chance that is LIFE. MoJo.

JSG

2,238 posts

296 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
Its a recommendation by the car manufacturers because there have been cases of younger children being killed by the impact of the air-bag (broken neck or nose up into brain). I guess their main concern may be avoiding law suits and not the fact that your child may be injured.

JSG.

JohnL

Original Poster:

1,763 posts

278 months

Friday 21st June 2002
quotequote all
The problems with child seats and airbags have been with rear facing child seats - children have been killed by the airbag in these situations.

People out of paranoia and misinterpretation have then turned this into any child seat at all, and from there into children in the front seat at all, etc. Although I suppose there's a theoretical risk of suffocation or something.

This is like don't eat cheese when pregnant. It's actually don't eat mould ripened cheese (eg brie), but this becomes all soft cheese, and then any cheese.

Misinformation, paranoia and stupidity - just to be on the safe side you understand.

bennno

13,552 posts

282 months

Saturday 22nd June 2002
quotequote all

its as the post below, front or rear facing seats can only be used in the front if the car has no airbag or has the airbag manufacturer disabled.

seems the force of the airbag could cause serious damage to a child in the front seat of a car and therefore not worth the risk.

BTW its not mould ripened cheese it is all soft cheese , it is to do with the risk of listeria.

Bennno

JohnL

Original Poster:

1,763 posts

278 months

Saturday 22nd June 2002
quotequote all
quote:

BTW its not mould ripened cheese it is all soft cheese , it is to do with the risk of listeria.


Which appears in mould ripened cheese hence that restriction.

Neil Menzies

5,167 posts

297 months

Monday 24th June 2002
quotequote all
quote:

seems the force of the airbag could cause serious damage to a child in the front seat of a car and therefore not worth the risk.


I thought air bags were 'tuned' to an 'average' adult weight in terms of their volume and speed of deployment. For a light adult, or a child, the airbag deploying discharges excess energy, and in a more minor accident, the air bag is more likely to injure than the accident itself.

I think some newer vehicles have 'tunable' airbags depending on the weight of the passenger.

whatever

2,174 posts

283 months

Monday 24th June 2002
quotequote all
quote:

quote:

seems the force of the airbag could cause serious damage to a child in the front seat of a car and therefore not worth the risk.


I thought air bags were 'tuned' to an 'average' adult weight in terms of their volume and speed of deployment. For a light adult, or a child, the airbag deploying discharges excess energy, and in a more minor accident, the air bag is more likely to injure than the accident itself.

I think some newer vehicles have 'tunable' airbags depending on the weight of the passenger.



So how does all this affect women drivers? I've witnessed many sitting so far forward that their chests are almost touching the steering wheel (or level with it) [ look -- I'm not angling for a joke here, ok ]. Any airbag firing from this range must surely be bad news?

nigelbasson

533 posts

279 months

Monday 24th June 2002
quotequote all
Don't many cars these days have the option of turning the passenger airbag off? This would solve the worry of it injuring your child more than the crash itself.

However - remember to turn it back on afterwards!

Ali_D

1,115 posts

297 months

Monday 24th June 2002
quotequote all
I've just been looking at shopping carts for the misses and it seems in that size car only the Pug 206 has switchable airbags. In this size car you would have thought it would be a big selling point - or should I have realised that all new mothers drive around in 4x4's.

Fatboy

8,197 posts

285 months

Tuesday 25th June 2002
quotequote all
quote:
its as the post below, front or rear facing seats can only be used in the front if the car has no airbag or has the airbag manufacturer disabled.


What you mean it's safe if you go round and kneecap the MD of the airbag company?

Anyway, aren't small children only supposed to be transported in soundproof boxes in the boot?

>> Edited by Fatboy on Tuesday 25th June 15:30

CarZee

13,382 posts

280 months

Tuesday 25th June 2002
quotequote all
quote:
Anyway, aren't small children only supposed to be transported in soundproof boxes in the boot?
I thought that's what those grey roof mounted boxes were for?