RE: Ford punts new hydrogen powered bus
RE: Ford punts new hydrogen powered bus
Thursday 30th September 2004

Ford punts new hydrogen powered bus

Just a shuttle for now but is this the future?


Once one of them does it, it seems they're all at it. A tad more pedestrian than BMW's high speed hydrogen car, Ford has launched an experimental hydrogen-powered bus, the H2ICE E-450.

The Ford H2ICE E-450 is a Ford E-450 chassis cab, with a shuttle bus body and a hydrogen-fuelled 6.8 litre Triton V10 engine. Ford will put two of the H2ICE E-450s into service as shuttle buses at the 2005 North American International Auto Show to demonstrate their capability.

"The hydrogen-fuelled shuttle bus is a product we could market to customers who need to move people in an efficient, environmentally friendly way," said Dr. Gerhard Schmidt, Ford's head of research and advanced engineering. "We think this is an interesting solution for airport transportation, for example."

The H2ICE E-450 seats up to 12 passengers and their luggage, including the driver. The vehicle is equipped with a 26-gallon equivalent, 5,000 lb/sq. inch hydrogen fuel tank. The engine is a modified 6.8 litre Triton V10. The range is expected to be up to 150-miles depending on conditions and vehicle load.

According to Ford, the company is active in the development of alternatives to traditional gasoline-powered internal combustion engines. For years, the car industry focused on battery-electric vehicles as the answer. But as years passed, battery technology never progressed or showed hope of progressing to reach a level near the efficiency of petrol power, said Ford. Now the industry has shifted its efforts toward petrol-powered hybrid-electric, "clean diesel," direct injection petrol  and diesel, and eventually, hydrogen-powered vehicles.

Ford developed the Escape Hybrid, a gasoline full hybrid-electric vehicle that is on sale now. Ford says it is also "very active" in fuel cell technology and is now producing a demonstration fleet of 30 Focus Fuel Cell Vehicles in collaboration with its alliance with Ballard Power Systems. These vehicles will be placed in Sacramento, Orlando, Southeast Michigan, Vancouver, and Germany. In Europe, Ford is also active in clean-diesel and direct injection technologies.

Hydrogen fuel cells are now almost universally recognized as the eventual heir to the internal combustion engine. Yet, even with tremendous progress in recent years, additional work is required to satisfy customer expectations in terms of durability and affordability.

As the development of the fuel cell continues to mature, the industry, governments, energy companies, and interested non-governmental organizations ponder how customers will fuel hydrogen vehicles of the future. Today's highway is lined with gasoline stations not equipped for hydrogen needs.

"We believe that H2ICE vehicles will play a key role in justifying infrastructure development and accelerating a transition to a hydrogen economy," said Schmidt.

Ford is working with BP to build a network of hydrogen fuelling stations in demonstration fleet markets to support the fuel cell vehicles. Some BP hydrogen refuelling stations will evaluate technologies that have near-term commercial feasibility, such as reformation of natural gas, while others will explore more long-term technology options and assess the potential to produce renewable-based hydrogen that achieve U.S. DOE hydrogen fuel cost targets.

While the development of fuel cells continues, Ford believes H2ICE is a technology that will make hydrogen-power more practical. Ford also is utilizing H2ICEs to developing stationary backup or supplemental power systems and off-street applications such as airport ground support vehicles. Making H2ICE accessible sooner will help spur growth in the development of a hydrogen infrastructure paving the way for fuel cells in the future.

 

Author
Discussion

dinkus

Original Poster:

21 posts

257 months

Thursday 30th September 2004
quotequote all
This seems to miss the point of how the hydrogen is obtained in the first place...

It's all very well having a vehicle that's only emission is water, but if the hydrogen is made from recombined natural gas it solves nothing.

The non-fossil fuel route involves electrolysis from water to start with, which requires a VAST amount of electricity, which comes from fossil fuelled power stations.

If you look at the whole energy cycle to power a car, diesel is still far more efficient and less polluting.

I think that the supply of hydrogen can be done efficiently, but it needs to be concentrated on just as much, if not more than the actual vehicles themselves.

riceturbo

13 posts

300 months

Thursday 30th September 2004
quotequote all
Hydrogen didn't do much for the Hindenburg though did it?

Fatboy

8,248 posts

294 months

Friday 1st October 2004
quotequote all
riceturbo said:
Hydrogen didn't do much for the Hindenburg though did it?

If you read up on the hindenburg (and I don't mean this as a dig at you) you'll see that the problem was that the dope used on the canvas frame was made up of aluminium and iron oxide - more commonly known as thermite!

It wasn't the hydrogen that caused the bang, rather the fact that it was effectively a huge thermite bomb with a load of hydrogen onboard which while it didn't exactly help matters , wasn't the cause of the disaster...

v8thunder

27,647 posts

280 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Oh God - they come up with environmentally friendly buses before cars we're done for.

daydreamer

1,409 posts

279 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Whilst I accept the arguement that non renewable electricity to make hydrogen is not environmentally friendly, Hydrogen still represents the best battery technology available too us (especially if there isn't a big hill to pump water up nearby).

As renewables are, by design, exceptionally unreliable (you can only drive your car on sunny / windy etc days), then battery storage is essential. (This arguement comes a little unstuck when it is accepted that nuclear power is very green indeed, but even this technology can't match demand with supply)

I agree therefore that the production of the fuel does need serious work - but that shouldn't stop developement of the applications for the fuel.

It does indeed look like this is the future

v8thunder

27,647 posts

280 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
True, but I can't help wondering that, rather than trying to tax us out of our cars, the govt. should be researching ways to make them more environmentally friendly, or else it is sheer control-freakery.

daydreamer

1,409 posts

279 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Ah - but all of the governments time is taken up with trying to (over?)spend the money that they already take from us - and to manage all of the people that they have employed to spend that money, thus leaving no time for clear, joined up thinking, about what might be for the good of the country in the medium to long term (oh, sod it, include short term in that list too).

Starting to sound like an F1 thread this - sorry guys .

cdp

8,017 posts

276 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Reformation of natural gas - why not just use the gas in the first place and avoid the extra complexity?

Electrolysis? That will need a lot of electricity.
Nuclear power yes please?

I think that electric and hydrogen will help but biomass fuels are still the cheapest, easiest and possibly the most environmentally friendly form of solar power.

andytk

1,558 posts

288 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
at least its not diseasel.

for what its worth US scientists have come up with a catalyst method of extracting hydrogen and CO2 from an ethanol (alcohol) and water mix.

It was a low temperature reaction and bio ethanol was used.

its worth remembering that there is more hydrogen in a gallon of bio ethanol than there is in a gallon of liquid hydrogen. Pure hydrogen is a piss poor way of storing it whether its compressed gas or cryo liquid.

I think the hydrogen bus is a good idea.

Andy

Fatboy

8,248 posts

294 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
andytk said:
at least its not diseasel.

for what its worth US scientists have come up with a catalyst method of extracting hydrogen and CO2 from an ethanol (alcohol) and water mix.

It was a low temperature reaction and bio ethanol was used.

its worth remembering that there is more hydrogen in a gallon of bio ethanol than there is in a gallon of liquid hydrogen. Pure hydrogen is a piss poor way of storing it whether its compressed gas or cryo liquid.

I think the hydrogen bus is a good idea.

Andy

You'd also be much better to run the bus on bio ethanol (easy enough) than arse around converting the ethanol to hydrogen + CO2 - pointless inefficiency IMHO

andytk

1,558 posts

288 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
True but then you don't get a vehicle that promotes hydrogen consumption which (apart from marketing) is the main point Ford are trying to make.

Andy