Random eyesight checks
Random eyesight checks
Author
Discussion

Niggle

Original Poster:

600 posts

286 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
About time as well, get the myopic bar stewards off the roads

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2157569.stm



>>> Edited by niggle on Monday 29th July 11:04

nevpugh308

4,432 posts

289 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
Two die in bungalow blaze ??

Simonelite501

1,440 posts

288 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
Yeah! they couldn't find the stair well to get downstairs to escape!!!

niggle

Original Poster:

600 posts

286 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
Boogar they've changed the URL, the beeb are running the story now ...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2157569.stm

madcop

6,649 posts

283 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
The legal requirement for eyesight tests is to be able to read clearly, a standard car registration plate at a distance of 67.5 feet or 21.5 meters in good daylight. Either unaided or wearing the correction that is used at the time of the incident or requirement of the test.

You would be surprised how many people, especially older people who cannot do this.

CarZee

13,382 posts

287 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
do you check people's eyesight when you attend an RTA then???

What happens if they fail it?

madcop

6,649 posts

283 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

do you check people's eyesight when you attend an RTA then???

What happens if they fail it?



Yes. If it appears that there may be a problemwith it. You can usually tell. Some people drop themselves in it by saying things like " He must have been travelling too fast, I didn't see him"
allways a pointer to the 67.5 foot walk from the patrol car

When someone fails, a report is sent that day to DVLA and the relevant person has their licence revoked (This is not the same as being disqualified by court, just No licence) on medical grounds until they can prove that their sight is up to the required minimum standard (new or stronger correction) In some cases they cannot comply if the sight has deteriorated that badly.

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

The legal requirement for eyesight tests is to be able to read clearly, a standard car registration plate at a distance of 67.5 feet or 21.5 meters in good daylight. Either unaided or wearing the correction that is used at the time of the incident or requirement of the test.

You would be surprised how many people, especially older people who cannot do this.




BBC story says; 20.5m (67 feet)... regardless of the technicalities - damn good idea.

yum

529 posts

293 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
Usual indication - wearing hat and gloves while driving, perhaps with pipe on the dashboard and slippers on rear shelf... low-powered Rover sitting in middle lane of empty motorway at constant 55mph.

If they cause a crash through poor eyesight, is it a serious penalty?



madcop

6,649 posts

283 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

quote:

The legal requirement for eyesight tests is to be able to read clearly, a standard car registration plate at a distance of 67.5 feet or 21.5 meters in good daylight. Either unaided or wearing the correction that is used at the time of the incident or requirement of the test.

You would be surprised how many people, especially older people who cannot do this.




BBC story says; 20.5m (67 feet)... regardless of the technicalities - damn good idea.



Was never any good at this new european measurement stuff. I prefer old money. They are right. It is 20.5 meters, but is 67.5 feet. I have walked it many times

phV6

9 posts

281 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
What happens if their vision is corrected, so that they can see at 20(ish) metres, but they then can't see the end of the bonnet because it's out of focus!

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

What happens if their vision is corrected, so that they can see at 20(ish) metres, but they then can't see the end of the bonnet because it's out of focus!



Unlikely to happen... if the lenses correct the sight, they will work over a range - for example 5cm to infinity.... like a pair of varifocals.

madcop

6,649 posts

283 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Usual indication - wearing hat and gloves while driving, perhaps with pipe on the dashboard and slippers on rear shelf... low-powered Rover sitting in middle lane of empty motorway at constant 55mph.

If they cause a crash through poor eyesight, is it a serious penalty?





To drive with defective vision is an offence. Sect 96(2) Road traffic act 1988 ( penalty is a fine which I cannot tell you the maximum)

Sect 96(3) RTA 1988 states it is an offence to fail to comply with the request for an eyesight test (again a fine)

The courts have a duty to notify the Sec of state of it appears that a person may have a relevant disease or disability.

A person whos licence ha been withdrawn may appeal through the courts for its re-instatement, but the DVLA can require the medical proof that the sight defect is no longer below the requirement.


Strange that if the suspicion of defective eyesight is found at night, then the test shouldn't be carried out under the same conditions where the suspicion arose.

The test can only be carried out in good daylight.


>> Edited by madcop on Monday 29th July 12:21

nevpugh308

4,432 posts

289 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
A slightly different question .... who comes up with these figures ?!? Why 67.5 feet (why not 65 or 70) ? Why 20.5m, what's wrong with 20m ?

Does that last .5m or .5ft make all the difference ?!?

madcop

6,649 posts

283 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

A slightly different question .... who comes up with these figures ?!? Why 67.5 feet (why not 65 or 70) ? Why 20.5m, what's wrong with 20m ?

Does that last .5m or .5ft make all the difference ?!?




F*KC KNOWS!!

kevinday

13,592 posts

300 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
Oh well, if you need good daylight to conduct the test you will not do many in the UK

niggle

Original Poster:

600 posts

286 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Does that last .5m or .5ft make all the difference ?!?



It works out at 4 seconds of visability at 60mph ?

scruff400

3,757 posts

281 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

quote:

Does that last .5m or .5ft make all the difference ?!?



It works out at 4 seconds of visability at 60mph ?



It's a huge amount less than 4 seconds, shirley.

At 60 miles an hour you will travel 88 feet per second

that's 26 meters (ok 26.8ish)

Sorry, 29 yards.

You would have already met the registration plate you were trying to look at!!

>> Edited by scruff400 on Monday 29th July 13:15

niggle

Original Poster:

600 posts

286 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
Sorry, your right, so it works out as about a 1 second at 45mph ... not a lot is it.

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Monday 29th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Oh well, if you need good daylight to conduct the test you will not do many in the UK



Except for the last 3 days, when it's been "cracking the flags"...!