RE: Michelin reveals tyred thinking
RE: Michelin reveals tyred thinking
Tuesday 18th January 2005

Michelin reveals tyred thinking

Tyre-maker's technology transforms your wheels


Tyre maker Michelin highlighted three so-called breakthrough technologies at the recent auto show in Detroit. The Michelin Airless and Michelin Tweel are tyres without air. PistonHeads reported on the Airless in November (link below). Te third is an Active Wheel -- which could mean cars don't need suspension components. There's no sign of any of these products reaching mass production, yet.

Based on two different technologies and manufactured using composite technologies and new materials, these non-pneumatic products could make punctures a thing of the past and eliminate the need to check tyre pressure. They also use fewer raw materials and are retreadable.

Michelin Tweel

Michelin said the Tweel "is the fusion of the tyre and the wheel with the potential to transform mobility. Available now for lower-speed, lower-weight carrying vehicles, Tweel is in the prototype stage for passenger car applications. Tweel delivers the benefits of pneumatic radial tyre performance while dramatically increasing lateral stiffness, which affects handling, cornering and responsiveness.  Additionally, Tweel has suspension-like characteristics that can simplify and in some applications eliminate the need for a separate vehicle suspension."

Michelin Airless

Michelin Airless enables vehicles to run safely and comfortably because its elastic characteristics are controlled longitudinally, transversally and vertically. A car doesn’t have to stop even if one or more of the radial bands break or are damaged. The Michelin Airless is being tested on passenger cars and motorcycles, but could be fitted to other vehicles as well.

Michelin Active Wheel

The Michelin Active Wheel is an integrated module comprised of a conventional tyre, plus an active electric suspension, a disc brake and an electric motor to provide traction and much of the braking power. Its compact size offers automotive engineers considerable design flexibility, said Michelin.

Michelin said the Active Wheel was the result of a total rethinking of the process whereby movement is transmitted. As well as doing what any wheel does -- roll to drive the vehicle forward -- the active wheel also acts as a suspension unit. This means that cars can be made without gearboxes, transmissions, differentials and stabiliser bars. Michelin reckons the Active Wheel will help to make cars lighter and simplify the transmission of movement.

www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=9412

Author
Discussion

GingerNinja

Original Poster:

3,982 posts

280 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all

Is it April 1st?

dick dastardly

8,325 posts

285 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Good on them for being innovative, but that Tweel is the funniest looking thing I've seen in a while!

dinkel

27,590 posts

280 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
dick dastardly said:
Good on them for being innovative, but that Tweel is the funniest looking thing I've seen in a while!


Looks weird . . . I guess wheels have a huge impact on how a car looks. They should think of that too. Future, future . . .

klassiekerrally

2,543 posts

277 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Ehm, the Tweel, is that a joke???

errek72

943 posts

268 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Yes, well, no points to the marketing department for the Tweel name then.

But having the shocks et al in the wheel -although great for packaging- increases the unspring weight, so dynamically is not good, right?

Any engineers who can comment on this?

jsr

1,155 posts

272 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
The rise in unsprung weight would be far offset by the reduction in sprung weight - no gearbox, driveshaft, differentials etc.

Whilst it would have some effect, unsprung weight is much less important on a car than it is a light vehicle, such as a mountain bike (where wheels can form a large part of the bike's weight)

sevengreen

23 posts

263 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
los angeles said:
Just count the nails and screws tossed in the road by your average lazy joiner and you'll welcome airless tyres. Most of the nails in Edinburgh end up in mine.

all MOscow's ones - in mines. HI Garreth

raftom

1,298 posts

283 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Tyre kickers would cut some toes in that Tweel thing.

Yugguy

10,728 posts

257 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
It's all very wheel but presently with your 150 quid alloy and 70 quid tyre if you have a blow out, or at the end of the tyre life, you don't have to replace the whole thing. How long would the friction material last on a tweel and once it is worn down can it be replaced or is it a new tweel.

Also, it looks cr@p basically.

huwbertus

59 posts

263 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Stuff like this was available on mountain bikes.

Solid "airless tyres" were available from Halfords some 10 years ago in loads of different colours.

Tioga (or similar) used a wheel with a cable insted of spokes and they won the world championship with it see the link for the wheel.

www.singletrackworld.com/mod/submit/images/1260-5.jpg

phase90

85 posts

296 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Considering peoples' desire to go for bigger rims and lower profile tires, isn't this the logical conclusion?

busta

4,504 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
My main concern with the Tweel would be that if you put alot of power through it all the spokey bits would just crumple as the rim inside turned befroe the tyre (or whatever it is) did. the same happens to bicycles rims if the spokes are put in radially and not cross laced.

Bernie

Dr Strangelove

419 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
busta said:
My main concern with the Tweel would be that if you put alot of power through it all the spokey bits would just crumple as the rim inside turned befroe the tyre (or whatever it is) did. the same happens to bicycles rims if the spokes are put in radially and not cross laced.

Bernie


I you take a closer look at the 'tweel's' bottom spokes, it looks like that is what has happened to them.

wedgepilot

819 posts

305 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
phase90 said:
Considering peoples' desire to go for bigger rims and lower profile tires, isn't this the logical conclusion?



Absolutely...some the modern ultra-low profile tyres can't be providing much in the way of compliance as it is.

groomi

9,330 posts

265 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
errek72 said:
Yes, well, no points to the marketing department for the Tweel name then.

But having the shocks et al in the wheel -although great for packaging- increases the unspring weight, so dynamically is not good, right?

Any engineers who can comment on this?


Think again. This could potentially REDUCE unsprung weight. The motor could replace the brake disk and caliper as we know it, and shouldn't weigh any more than your standard steel system does now. The 'suspension' unit itself is actually far smaller than conventional wishbones, struts et al so potentially lighter.

Likewise there would be much reduced frictional losses from rotating components such as gearbox, driveshaft etc.

This is very clever technology (Not groundbreaking 'cos it's been conceptually on drawingboards for decades, but to actually make it work is something worth congratulating).

Disclaimer: The above comparisons relate to standard mass-production materials not expensive, low volume composites.

phase90

85 posts

296 months

Wednesday 19th January 2005
quotequote all
Didn't Ferdinand Porsche put electric motors in the hub when he worked for Lohner in 1900? And then follow that with a gas engine hybrid...

anonymous-user

76 months

Wednesday 19th January 2005
quotequote all

errek72 said:
Yes, well, no points to the marketing department for the Tweel name then.

But having the shocks et al in the wheel -although great for packaging- increases the unspring weight, so dynamically is not good, right?

Any engineers who can comment on this?


have you felt the weight of a conventional disk/caliper/hub? given that the motor/alternator does most of the braking i guess the normal disk can be replaced with a very small (low thermal capacity) disk even an alloy one (like a small version of the elise mmc disks). there's a chance the unsprung weight could be comparable. even if the 'new' wheel does have heavier unsprung weight, packaging is more important these days hence FWD cars now being the norm.
more intriguing is how the geometry works, bump steer, body roll etc...


errek72

943 posts

268 months

Wednesday 19th January 2005
quotequote all
francisb said:

more intriguing is how the geometry works, bump steer, body roll etc...


Because of less manoeuvering room for the springs/shocks?
This than would probably work well with a sporty car, especially a light one, and less so on luxery sedans, right?

Apart from the brakes do not forget the springs and shocks add weight to the wheel too.

Could both springs and shocks be replaced by an electric actuator (I might be going into star trek mode now ), reducing the wheel weight?

Just curious


InRong Ghia

100 posts

306 months

Wednesday 19th January 2005
quotequote all
Hmmmmm, the amount of power that the tweel can handle will sort of be limited by the size of brake that can be placed inside - That 'Rim' looks quite small, effectively giving a high profile 'tyre'. Maybe if they were to make an active tweel, then that would be irrelevant.

pdV6

16,442 posts

283 months

Wednesday 19th January 2005
quotequote all
I don't get it - surely bunging all the suspension gubbins into the "active" wheel just creates a pacakaging nightmare and reduces available wheel articulation? Presumably, then, it would only be of use in a (smooth) road-going sports car?