RU 2 Close?
Strathclyde Police target tailgaters
Police in Scotland have launched a campaign to stop drivers tailgating. Strathclyde Police launched their "RU 2 Close" campaign yesterday.
Already the RAC Foundation have pitched in with a survey on the subject. According to them loads of motorists are ‘an accident waiting to happen’ due to their tailgating habits.
A tailgating survey was conducted at 15 sites across the UK, for a period of two hours. The total sample of vehicles was approximately 15,000. Data collected from the M8 site showed that 27 per cent of drivers were driving too close, whilst it was higher still in other parts of the UK.
So, the solution? More driver training and education or more road markings? The RAC want more of those chevrons on the road that show safe distances.
Experiments show that on a stretch of road preceding chevrons, tailgating was at around 60 per cent. Right in the middle of the chevron patch, it appeared to drop off 'significantly'. While it did pick up again after the chevron patch, not to the extent that it was at beforehand - suggesting chevrons could have a role to play in changing driver behaviour.
At present there are only a small number of sites on UK motorways with chevrons, and although acknowledging that the ‘novelty factor’ may make people keep their distance at chevron locations, the Foundation is calling for a review as to whether any more appropriate sites for chevrons can be identified.
A previous TRL study has shown accident reduction of 56 per cent at chevrons sites, compared to the same stretch of road before the chevrons were installed.
I've seen a few accidents caused by this as inattentive people have failed to brake in time for the stopped traffic, in theory not bad idea just doesn't seem to work in practice.
These jams also slow up journey times
Matt
Also do the RAC ever have anything positive to say about motorists????
Chevrons - OK but if they really worked then people driving the road in question would be tail gating at all because they would have learnt the distance to leave! Therefore don't see that they are doing much good...
What about the affect that amount of paint could have to bikers on a rainy day? Doesn't the paint get noticeably slicker than the pavement?
Gary
1) You leave the gap required and then someone pulls in to it, so you back off more. People approaching traffic in their lanes will often pull into your lane, as you are just about to overtake them and the other cars in front of them.
2) This issue should also be linked with the middle and outer lane numpties, who simply drive along oblivious to what's going on around them in these lanes, at whatever speed they choose.
Otherwise, anything that reduces accidents is worth considering (apart from cameras in non-essential areas)
Whether there are other knock-on effects such as reduced alerness or surface changes for bikers, I don't know...but I think they're a good idea.
As for the RAC...they've come up with some sense, but as has been said, they're still bashing the driver???
Go figure!
The reason a lot of people end up travelling too close is if they leave a gap to the car in front it's usually filled by someone flying up the left hand lane(s), who proceeds to weave in and out of the traffic so by the time they get to the M74 cut off they will be ten seconds ahead of all the losers who wait in turn. Vans, reps and sheds are by far the worst.
gary_tholl said:
However, I also found myself paying more attention to the chevrons right in front of me, than the cars in the lanes beside me.
Gary
More paint. Less attention.
gary_tholl said:
What about the affect that amount of paint could have to bikers on a rainy day? Doesn't the paint get noticeably slicker than the pavement?
Gary
More paint. More skids.
What is this obsession with telling people what to do instead of getting them to think?
1. people have a more relaxed attitude to driving
2. majority drive automatics (see point 1)
3. you can pass on either side of traffic
Yesterday I found myself driving in convoy at 90mph on an interstate with a limit of 70mph!
What I'm trying to say is that the British driving style is the problem. I think the Germans are similar in style to the Americans - hold back until the guy in front pulls over and then punch it rather than agressively trying to nudge past all the time and getting aggitated. It works here and I like the American way of 'cruising' around
Of course the sunshine helps too.Not more damn chevrons!! Bloody useless things. Have got them on a stretch of the M5 near me. They caused chaos when the were put in, cos everyone suddenly slowed down to try and create the gap they set. Cue inpromptue traffic jam for no discernable reason. This happened every day for about a month whenever the traffic got a bit heavier.
Seems to have calmed down now. Everyone has started ignoring them, making them a complete failure anyway.
jesprit said:
What I'm trying to say is that the British driving style is the problem. I think the Germans are similar in style to the Americans - hold back until the guy in front pulls over and then punch it rather than agressively trying to nudge past all the time and getting aggitated. It works here and I like the American way of 'cruising' around Of course the sunshine helps too.
You know, I think the man might just have it! As drivers, we're a nation of impatient aggressive ****s surrounded by incompetent unobservant ****s - can anyone see a problem here?!?
Gassing Station | Motoring News | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





ABOUT BLOODY TIME!!!!!