RE: Connaught Type D unveiled
RE: Connaught Type D unveiled
Tuesday 29th November 2005

Connaught Type D unveiled

New 300bhp British sports car on sale now


300bhp Connaught Type-D
300bhp Connaught Type-D
There's a new British sports car on the street: Connaught is about to launch the Type-D Syracuse (see links to related stories below).

With 300bhp and 274lb-ft of torque from a supercharged front-mounted 2.0-litre V10 petrol engine, the 750Kg car is no slouch. The company claims an entirely believable 0-60mph in under five seconds and a top speed of 170mph. The 2+2 coupé is made of composites and stainless steel with aluminium panels.

The car was created to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Tony Brooks' historic win for Connaught in the 1955 Syracuse Grand Prix. Connaught was the first British manufacturer to win a Formula 1 Grand Prix, beating works Maserati & Ferraris and the first to build their own aerodynamic wind tunnel.

Due to debut at Autosport International in January, production starts in May. But if you want one, contact the company now as there will only be 100 made -- and 28 have already been sold for the asking price of between £60,000 to £80,000, depending on spec.

Hybrid

In future, there'll be a ‘HigherBred’ (d'oh!) petrol/electric hybrid version, which will include an electric motor and a normally aspirated version of the V10 with 162bhp and 142lb ft of torque. Performance is claimed to be 0-60mph in 6.5 seconds and Vmax of 140mph -- and 42mpg. Impressively, it'll only weigh 100Kg more.

The brainchild of two ex-Jaguar consultant engineers, Tim Bishop and Tony Martindale, the Connaught Type-D has to date received almost half a million pounds worth of funding from the Energy Saving Trust and has 17 patents pending on its ground-breaking technology.

The car was previewed at the Goodwood Revival, a fitting venue to resurrect a famous name of 1950s automotive engineering, but the new Connaught Motor Company insists that it's no heritage-laden throw-back to past eras.

Links

Author
Discussion

billb

Original Poster:

3,198 posts

287 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
i hope it looks better in real life...

GTRene

20,803 posts

246 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
Here is another picture, and it looks a bit better, could be a nice powercar...

a bit strange, but different, and thats not a bad thing and they only make 100? maybe they can't sell more but serious, I wish them luck.
René

baddawg

12 posts

245 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
from that side profile it reminds me of the Lancia (Zagato) Hyena show car made in the mid 90's with just a redesigned front end!

lathamjohnp

4,477 posts

306 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
Apparently it's 850kg, not 750.

www.connaughtmotorco.com/specifications.html

Still mighty impressive though.

wab172uk

2,005 posts

249 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
God, that is one Ugly car. With those looks they won't sell many IMHO. Why create a "Sports Car" then fail with the looks.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
The styling looks like a cross between a Bangle BMW, Rover 75 (R.I.P.) and a Range Rover.

2.0 Ltr V10 supercharged engine That's a pretty complex lump. Where are they getting that from or will it be a bespoke inhouse unit?

Hendry

1,945 posts

304 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all

If this is going to fill the £30K - £40K space as previously suggested then it could be very interesting, as there is nothing bespoke for that much money that you can get new. Much more money than that and it starts to sit shoulder to shoulder with TVRs, Marcos' etc. And those are going to interest sports cars buyers more than the Connaught, I can't help thinking.

All the same, this looks really interesting and I am looking forward to seeing it.

driller

8,310 posts

300 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
Fugly. Jesus what's wrong with the designers?

paz

78 posts

248 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
The engine looks a strange lump...a V10 but only 2 litres, can't think of another manufacturer it comes from, can anyone?

I suppose it will be quite light compared to other V10's, but you can get a two litre from a 4 pot...and 300bhp, ie Impreza's. They must be going for the quirky originally thing.

Stephen White

100 posts

304 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
Interesting and confusing, at the same time...
I suspect that we're seeing the result of an insufficiently-funded research effort, which has resulted in a too-slow-to-market product: this thing would have been really exciting three years ago, but the major manufacturers are already technologically ahead of this. For one thing, the engine should have been a diesel/electric hybrid - the latest direct-injection TD engines are far superior to gasoline engines, if economy is anywhere near the top of your agenda. Plus, this size of engine (by weight, or bulk - not displacement) in a TDI design would have way more torque (double?)than this engine, which would have allowed them to pursue a more agressive electricity-recovery strategy, and the resulting mileage would have been truly eye-opening! Just look at what BMW has accomplished with their current TD packages...
I actually kind of like the front-end styling - it definitely resembles the Lancia Hyena, but that's no bad thing - but I'd have to see some serious wind-tunnel numbers, to accept the rear-end details - it has the reek of 'grad-student final project,' if you know what I mean...

ubergreg

261 posts

253 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all


Might make more sense as a drophead, because right now the shape looks very mass-market to me.

The two-litre V10 must sound pretty interesting, and I'll bet the drivetrain has a wickedly smooth delivery...

havoc

32,542 posts

257 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
Looks may not be great but I'd love to drive one!!! That's gonna be a fun engine!!!

Stephen - you're missing one big point - 850kg is a full 1/2-tonne less than an STi. So the bhp/tonne will be rather stunning...the car will trouble a lot of machinery twice it's price, I'd wager.

As for the whole diesel thing - they wanted to create a SPORTS CAR! Diesels are heavy lumps and don't sound sporty...and don't deliver a "sporty" feel to the drive, either.

Marquis_Rex

7,377 posts

261 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
paz said:
The engine looks a strange lump...a V10 but only 2 litres, can't think of another manufacturer it comes from, can anyone?

I suppose it will be quite light compared to other V10's, but you can get a two litre from a 4 pot...and 300bhp, ie Impreza's. They must be going for the quirky originally thing.


It's their own in house unit.
Which reminds me, they owe me some dosh!

AER

1,145 posts

292 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
What a waste of time an effort. Why a 2.0L V10? It acheives nothing apart from (some) NVH benefits and gee-wow, but with massive penalties for friction, packaging, complexity, cost and weight. Where are they heading with this idea then?

havoc

32,542 posts

257 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
AER said:
What a waste of time an effort. Why a 2.0L V10? It acheives nothing apart from (some) NVH benefits and gee-wow, but with massive penalties for friction, packaging, complexity, cost and weight.

In what way? Packaging shouldn't be any more difficult than a Scooby lump or a VR6, IMHO. Complexity...sure, but so what, Honda engines are massively complex but the most reliable part of the whole car. Cost? For 300bhp? Weight? Why should it weigh much more than any other 2.0?

Hendry

1,945 posts

304 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all

I agree with all of those on this thread that say this car should have a 2-litre four pot and styling better oned for the wind tunnel. I believe they should also have called it the "320Ci" - after all, many have proved there's no market for original thinking and a gung-ho f*** the rest attitude...

Come on chaps, we Brits love the underdog! Give them a chance!



zaktoo

1,401 posts

262 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
It's certainly an interesting effort, especially that drivetrain. Marquis, do you have any inside info on that V10? Like bore & stroke perhaps?

BTW, it would appear not to be supercharged - the 13:1 compression ratio is very high for a force-fed motor.


Ciao

Zak

900T-R

20,406 posts

279 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
If it's got a really, really short stroke (likely, given the capacity) and revs to infinity and beyond however...

AER said:
What a waste of time an effort. Why a 2.0L V10? It acheives nothing apart from (some) NVH benefits and gee-wow, but with massive penalties for friction, packaging, complexity, cost and weight. Where are they heading with this idea then?

Hendry

1,945 posts

304 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
900T-R said:
If it's got a really, really short stroke (likely, given the capacity) and revs to infinity and beyond however...



Either that or a very tall engine with ten knitting needles in it.

g7jhp

7,024 posts

260 months

Tuesday 29th November 2005
quotequote all
Ugly, it looks like an Austin Allegro on steroids