RE: Connaught Type D: exclusive
RE: Connaught Type D: exclusive
Thursday 8th December 2005

Connaught Type D: exclusive

PH brings you first photos


none
none
none
Connaught Type-D Syracuse
Connaught Type-D Syracuse

Connaught rolled out the Type-D GT Syracuse for the press yesterday, although the car itself is not yet a runner.

When it is, the supercharged V10 will deliver some 300bhp in a car weighing 875Kg. This will be the first product to market and customer deliveries start in April - May 2006 - there are already many orders, according to Connaught.

This car is not a hybrid. It uses the Connaught 22.5 degree V10 with a twin-intercooled, scroll-type supercharger, its aim being to bring some exposure and early revenues to the company. Joining the range after this will be the hybrid V10 version, without supercharge initially but with the supercharged engine offered later; as well as a normally-aspirated V10-engined car. This last car would come in at around £42,000.

The car appeared exquisitely engineered and looked much tidier than the early model in red, which has polarised opinion. In the skin, this rolling chassis, production number 1 and likely to act as a show car, has real presence, with wonderful finish and a compact yet aggressive stance.

As yet there are no running prototypes, although the engine has been spun up and according to those who have heard it sounds fantastic, even on tickover.  Although the engine was designed in house and finally assembly takes place at Connaught, it uses as many existing (therefore available and cheaper) parts as possible - the connecting rods for example apparently come from a "readily available Japanese engine".

Contrary to rumour, there are no motorcycle parts, the pistons from each 200cc cylinder being manufactured in Italy and based on those in the Smart.

No car has yet had the conventional drivetrain linked to allow it to start running for chassis setup, but Connaught expects this to happen soon. It will handle "as well as any other production car", said the company, and be fully capable of being used every day, clearing speed bumps with four people onboard.

The list price is expected to be £62,000. Only 100 will be made at the rate of around one a week, running up to a maximum of three a week.

The team seemed enormously excited, were all very focused and knowledgeable on the industry as a whole -- and even chief exec Tim Bishop had grime under his fingernails.

Previous story on PH: Connaught Type D unveiled

Author
Discussion

havoc

Original Poster:

32,545 posts

257 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
I fear people will think it's too pricey for the engine size...a 2-litre car for £60k?!?

But look at the bhp/tonne and it's on the money - that's GT3/TVR territory!

I fear, though, that TVR's may be it's undoing (and Marcos, Wiesmann...) - the £50k+ market has a lot of very good looking entrants with loads of power already...this will need to handle like a Lotus and have Jap-level build/reliability to command that price, IMHO.

Hope it does though...'cause I'd love to hear/see/feel that engine in real life, the spec of it has me drooling already!

pauly

434 posts

304 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
Plus the fact that it looks utter pants!

DustyC

12,820 posts

276 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
Looks fantastic and Im suprised its so cheap for such an engine. Is there a zero missing off the price?

annodomini2

6,962 posts

273 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
No pictures of the front?

GingerNinja

3,982 posts

280 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all

I like the looks of that thing - although the front wheel looks too small.

R988

7,495 posts

251 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
No pictures of the front?


The front is hideous, that is why.

Look at the previous articles links to see the front.

billb

3,198 posts

287 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
No pictures of the front?


dont go there!!

Hendry

1,945 posts

304 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all

The front looks good on the Syracuse model shown here, I was there yesterday and saw it in the skin. They have new headlights over the red model, LED side lights in the style of the 5-series, an agressive chin spolier and even chromed chickenwire intakes on the bonnet! Looks good.

mr_tony

6,343 posts

291 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
Looks good - I'll happily put myself down for the hybrid as an everyday car. Better go find their website

DustyC

12,820 posts

276 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
Nope, seen front, still like it.

I'd go for one. V10 is the ultimate for me. Its the most efficeint engine config at getting the right power to the right places!

Monty

39 posts

305 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
It looks like a cross between the ugly bits of a Nissan GT and an Austin Wolseley (IMHO of course)

b10

1,362 posts

289 months

Thursday 8th December 2005
quotequote all
Monty said:
Austin Wolseley (IMHO of course)

Can you explain - no such car? If you mean a BMC era Wolseley which model do you mean? Wolesley was bought by Morris before WW2 and then Nuffield (which obviously included Morris and Wolesley)and Austin joined forces in 52 to become BMC.

Monty

39 posts

305 months

Friday 9th December 2005
quotequote all
[redacted]

DustyC

12,820 posts

276 months

Friday 9th December 2005
quotequote all
[redacted]

off_again

13,917 posts

256 months

Friday 9th December 2005
quotequote all
GingerNinja said:

I like the looks of that thing - although the front wheel looks too small.


Yeap, completely agree - I have just taken a closer look again and the size of the wheels are exaggerated by the height of the bodywork above the wheel arches. It looks a bit "heavy" above the wheels, and even with blinging wheels they will look small - what they need to do is reduce the height above the wheel arches and put some bigger wheels on it - should improve it considerably.....

Hendry

1,945 posts

304 months

Saturday 10th December 2005
quotequote all
off_again said:
GingerNinja said:

I like the looks of that thing - although the front wheel looks too small.


Yeap, completely agree - I have just taken a closer look again and the size of the wheels are exaggerated by the height of the bodywork above the wheel arches. It looks a bit "heavy" above the wheels, and even with blinging wheels they will look small - what they need to do is reduce the height above the wheel arches and put some bigger wheels on it - should improve it considerably.....


How do they do that? Criticism is easy, but how do you suggest they make the wheels look bigger and/or reduce the height above the wheels?

By the way, this thing looks a stack better in the skin.

diluculophile

130 posts

273 months

Saturday 10th December 2005
quotequote all
The looks certainly seem to polarise opinion, much like BMWs of late. Personally, I think the thing is worryingly gorgeous, and that's the first time i've seen a decent picture of the back -i'm impressed. Lose the writing on the bumper area and it would look better, but that's just pedantic.

baskey

14,291 posts

248 months

Saturday 10th December 2005
quotequote all
if it was cheap i could see myself appreciating the RacingAllegro looks...

jazzyjeff

3,652 posts

281 months

Monday 12th December 2005
quotequote all
[redacted]

Monty

39 posts

305 months

Monday 12th December 2005
quotequote all
[redacted]