'Safety' Camera and special cycle lane
'Safety' Camera and special cycle lane
Author
Discussion

CiderwithCerbie

Original Poster:

1,420 posts

289 months

Saturday 17th June 2006
quotequote all
Here's a story for you that didn't make the headlines.

An Anaesthetic Registrar who had recently moved from our hospital to Plymouth was killed last week when cycling. He was in a reserved bus/taxi/cycle lane, coming up to the site of a 'Safety' Camera. A driver had braked hard to avoid being flashed, two others had virtually stopped behind him and a Beemer swerved into the left hand lane collecting the poor doctor through his side window, resulting in fatal head injuries.

Another staggering success of current road safety policies. A life and future of a highly gifted and useful member of society wasted.

RIP

Plotloss

67,280 posts

292 months

Saturday 17th June 2006
quotequote all
Blimey.

Poor chap.

But that sort of story should surely be picked up and run with, in the correct and respectful way of course.

tahiti

991 posts

269 months

Saturday 17th June 2006
quotequote all
That's got to be one of the Nationals surely?!

agent006

12,058 posts

286 months

Saturday 17th June 2006
quotequote all
Personally i think the driver who didn't see the camera in time should be banned for life. That sort of lack of observation is inexcusable and is what kills people, not speed or speed cameras. What's he going to not see in time next, the school bus queue?

GreenV8S

30,999 posts

306 months

Saturday 17th June 2006
quotequote all
agent006 said:
Personally i think the driver who didn't see the camera in time should be banned for life. That sort of lack of observation is inexcusable and is what kills people, not speed or speed cameras. What's he going to not see in time next, the school bus queue?


Without knowing the circumstances, I don't think it's fair to condemn any of the drivers. Any of them COULD be at fault, and several of them probably were at fault (following too close, not paying attention, that sort of thing) but there isn't any of them that you can definitely say was at fault without knowing further details.

agent006

12,058 posts

286 months

Saturday 17th June 2006
quotequote all
My point is that anybody who needs to "brake hard" to avoid being flashed is not safe to be behind the wheel.

cptsideways

13,820 posts

274 months

Monday 19th June 2006
quotequote all
agent006 said:
My point is that anybody who needs to "brake hard" to avoid being flashed is not safe to be behind the wheel.


That'll be 99% of drivers then

This should make the headlines ASAP

off_again

13,917 posts

256 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
Worth pointing in the direction of Safespeed?

corozin

2,680 posts

293 months

Monday 26th June 2006
quotequote all
agent006 said:
Personally i think the driver who didn't see the camera in time should be banned for life. That sort of lack of observation is inexcusable and is what kills people, not speed or speed cameras. What's he going to not see in time next, the school bus queue?


Frankly all the drivers concerned should be prosecuted. All were travelling too fast, too close to the car in front and were unable to brake in a controlled way.

Richards 7

124 posts

236 months

Monday 26th June 2006
quotequote all
Firstly dreadful to hear of someones death, very bad news. But I think the point firstly being made was that the speed camera lobby are looking at the issue with a very blinkered opinion. I know a similar thing that happened near me but luckily the pedestrian (in this case) survived. These cameras may slow a few people down (by this I mean slow people down over a whole journey not just a few yards by the camera), but most carry on normally, slowing only at the camera location. There are fewer police on the road as cameras are introduced and I beleive that the standard of driving has thus fallen. Fact is that the doctor would probably be alive if there was no camera there, what we do not know what the other effects would be. My experience is that when cameras were on the M6 Manchester Ship Canal bridge set at 40mph for a 3 lane motorway it was jolly hard to maintain concentration to the same standard as when I'm travelling at normal motorway speeds. By the way I have crashed my car twice both well below the speed limit.

bigdods

7,175 posts

249 months

Tuesday 27th June 2006
quotequote all
Its a driver reaction and education issue really. From experience (I travel a lot of miles in a year) there are lots of drivers who automatically slow down when they see a camera. Even if they are travelling at or below the limit already. This is most often seen on A and B roads rather than motorways. Some of these people slow down by braking very hard. Now this is mainly influenced by how sure you are of the speed limit (I think). So travelling down a road, see a camera - hmm I THINK its 40 down here but maybe its 30 - I'll slow down to be sure.

And of course theres that whole group of people who think NSL on a dual carriageway is 60 , so best to go past the scamera at 50 (why do people go past cameras 5 or 10mph less than the speed limit?) they brake creating a differential of 20MPH with the other traffic where before it was all flowing nicely.....


ron_rocket

7 posts

254 months

Saturday 1st July 2006
quotequote all
was he wearing a cycle helmet????