PAY PAY PAY says Milliband - PAY MORE
PAY PAY PAY says Milliband - PAY MORE
Author
Discussion

aston67

Original Poster:

872 posts

253 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
March 06, 2007

'Make car drivers pay for their pollution'Joe Bolger

Drivers may face limits on the carbon emissions produced by their cars, which could affect the number of journeys that they can make.

As part of a wider plan to slow climate change, car users could be given individual limits on the amount of carbon they are allowed to emit. Drivers polluting above the limit would have to pay for the privilege.

www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1475348.ece

Timberwolf

5,374 posts

241 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
Maybe he'd like to go and square up to the IMF, who consider British taxes to be so high that any further increase would be "perilous".

Or perhaps he'd like to go and chat with the people who can't afford to live near their place of work and can't afford to simply go out and buy another car. He might find those voters in something called a "Labour heartland."

You can't tax things out of the system, because by the time you've really hit the pocket of someone with the financial resources to run an expensive or thirsty car, you've priced over half the population off the road. The only way out from here is to provide a cheaper public transport alternative that's within striking distance of the convenience of a car, and we all know how well that's going nationally.

aston67

Original Poster:

872 posts

253 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
he is an utter marxist, his idea to give each person a carbon tax card sounds like the food-cards in Eastern Germany after ww II

he is the politician with the most threateaning ideas in Britain today IMHO

he uses the green agenda as a tool to leverage a class war

I would not like him at dinner, that's for sure

Timberwolf

5,374 posts

241 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
aston67 said:
I would not like him at dinner, that's for sure


Why not?

Poisoned wine, dark saloon, body in boot, hoon to secluded moorland, funeral pyre, shovel, job's a good'un.


Edited by Timberwolf on Tuesday 6th March 11:55

fatboy b

9,662 posts

239 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
If this is the new plan, then surely it'd be easier just to hike fuel prices.

ing government haven't got a clue really. rolleyes

HiRich

3,337 posts

285 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
There is an excellent article in the current Private Eye (page36, "Road Rage". the opening sentence reads "National road pricing could work well in a country with a transport policy - so not Britain then."
It goes on to expain the reasons why over the past 50 years (and still) the Government has encouraged us to use the car over alternatives, including:
- Proposals for rail, bus, even cycling schemes have to consider in their impact analysis the loss of income (e.g. fuel duty) making them look less appealing.
- The rail companies are not incentivised to carry more passengers efficiently. If demand increases, they increase the fares rather than, gee here's an idea, lay on more trains (not just a concept, PE has provided many examples of this happening).
- A good local policy would bring travellers in on arterial routes (e.g. to mainline stations) then direct them on to their final destinations with light systems such as trams. But all tram schemes have been cancelled, except those in Scotland (would now be a good time to point out that the last two Transport Ministers have been Scottish?).

Well worth a five minute read in WH Smiths, I mean library.

apache

39,731 posts

307 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
aston67 said:
March 06, 2007

'Make car drivers pay for their pollution'Joe Bolger

Drivers may face limits on the carbon emissions produced by their cars, which could affect the number of journeys that they can make.




Hang on, hang on, new cars produce next to no emissions and will continue to produce less with each passing year. The true 'carbon footprint' of a modern car equates to the square root of feck all so just how, exactly, is he going to penalise the motorist? If he pronounces this tax based on dodgy science and the witterings of a bunch of sociopath hippies then he can expect a carbon footprint on his shiny arse.
This will simply be illegal

Mr Whippy

32,175 posts

264 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
Timberwolf said:
aston67 said:
I would not like him at dinner, that's for sure


Why not?

Poisoned wine, dark saloon, body in boot, hoon to secluded moorland, funeral pyre, shovel, job's a good'un.


Edited by Timberwolf on Tuesday 6th March 11:55


I like the cut of your jib!

Dave

imfinlay

3,370 posts

238 months

Tuesday 6th March 2007
quotequote all
aston67 said:

I would not like him at dinner, that's for sure



I'd feed all at the dinner based on their hot air emissions, to deal with global warming. He could have an egg. Not cooked of course, as that would use energy.

Ian

skymaster

731 posts

230 months

Wednesday 7th March 2007
quotequote all
Global Warming, wether it is really happening or not there is still no proved correlation between Carbon emmissions and the temperature of the globe. The climate has changed no end over thousands of years. I think C4 are screening a prog in the next few days about what a huge con it is.

cw42

976 posts

254 months

Wednesday 7th March 2007
quotequote all
SCIENTIFIC DOCUMENTARY: The Great Global Warming Swindle
On: Channel 4 (104)
Date: Thursday 8th March 2007 (starting in 1 day)
Time: 21:00 to 22:35 (1 hour and 35 minutes long)

Polemical film challenging the consensus that man-made CO2 is heating up the earth. Featuring leading academics, the film questions the science behind the accepted reasons for global warming and argues other explanations for climate change are not being properly aired.
(Watch Online, Subtitles)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Excerpt taken from DigiGuide - the world's best TV guide available from www.getdigiguide.com/?p=1&r=27209

Copyright (c) GipsyMedia Limited.

v8d

458 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th March 2007
quotequote all
Global warming is a soapbox for eco-terrorists, and a Licence to tax for Governments

derestrictor

18,764 posts

284 months

Wednesday 7th March 2007
quotequote all
Was he bullied at school?

skymaster

731 posts

230 months

Wednesday 7th March 2007
quotequote all
Do you mean Milliband? God only knows but it seems that these Labourites do have issues. I do wish they would just seek councseling as opposed to taking out their frustrations with the world on us.

aston67

Original Poster:

872 posts

253 months

Thursday 8th March 2007
quotequote all
the scary thing is that Labour is pushing Milliband to become a potential canditate for PM even against Brown

Labour post Blair era will see a comeback of those communist ideas that have been kept quiet so far. Look at Trident and all the anti-americanism that is evident...

Red Britain...

apache

39,731 posts

307 months

Thursday 8th March 2007
quotequote all
skymaster said:
Do you mean Milliband? God only knows but it seems that these Labourites do have issues. I do wish they would just seek councseling as opposed to taking out their frustrations with the world on us.



He does look like the kid everyone picked on at school doesn't he?

bobsterv12

1,152 posts

233 months

Thursday 8th March 2007
quotequote all
there is something weird about milliband, something about his eyes suggests psycho.

skymaster

731 posts

230 months

Thursday 8th March 2007
quotequote all
I agree that old Labour will surface once Blair has gone. Lets be realistic for a second. Tony managed to put a nice gloss on the Labour Party, a rebrand and all of a sudden they were electable. In those two years I cant see it was possible to change a party so radically. Underneath the 'new labour' gloss is old Labour desperate to show it's true colours again.

In terms of Milliband being a Psyco, you also have a good point, lets look at some Labourites shall we:-

Blunkett : Even he accepts that he is mentally unstable
Prescott: Angry, womanising, violent thug who admits labour is at it's best when fighting a class war
Brown: A passionate socialist who sees no merit in opulence, fast cars or wealth for the individual
Blair: Just a few feet away from toppling over the edge and the fastest man to grow ever.
Mandleson: Has done nothing but help create laws that favour gay people inc making it legal for grown men to have sex with boys as young as 16 (16!, thats still a child in my book)

The list goes on, and these are the people that currently run britain!!! Theres little wonder it's in a mess.

dan f

6 posts

232 months

Thursday 8th March 2007
quotequote all
aston67 said:
he is an utter marxist........., he uses the green agenda as a tool to leverage a class war



Exactly what I thought.
Maybe this is Labours way of using 'green issues' to force a redistribution of wealth, which is what they really want anyway......
No point in trying to better yourself these days. Seems strangely like the early seventies.......
Anyway, who will pay all the taxes when the working people who are paying them have all left?

aston67

Original Poster:

872 posts

253 months

Thursday 8th March 2007
quotequote all
Abramovich?