Norway is forbidding normal fuel car's
Norway is forbidding normal fuel car's
Author
Discussion

SamuliS

Original Poster:

45 posts

226 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
Yes. Just read a new's that told that the europe's rich oil country is going to forbid all normal fueled car's from 2015, after that they will not allow selling new car's that run purely on gasoline. They still allow selling old one's. So fill it up on Ethanol, please.

grumbledoak

32,362 posts

256 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
Is this true ?

If so, it isn't going to help dispel the "All that twilight makes them mental" rumours...

thunderbelmont

2,982 posts

247 months

Thursday 24th May 2007
quotequote all
I think it's a bloody good idea.
Norway are thinking outside of the box when it comes to reducing fossil fuel consumption.

Our government wouldn't dare do something like that, they love the revenue from the oil too much.

P100

636 posts

229 months

Friday 25th May 2007
quotequote all
thunderbelmont said:
I think it's a bloody good idea.
Norway are thinking outside of the box when it comes to reducing fossil fuel consumption.

Our government wouldn't dare do something like that, they love the revenue from the oil too much.
I absolutely agree.
The motorist must be the highest taxed group in this Sceptered Isle, and as such would have the biggest political voice, (if they wanted it).

Despite this governments hidden laws and bills it would still be possible to bring the country to its knees within days if we all stopped buying Petrol!
Therefore starving them of tax.

If they follow Norways lead here, I for one, would be happy to run on ethanol.

Roy

herewego

8,814 posts

236 months

Friday 25th May 2007
quotequote all
P100 said:
thunderbelmont said:
I think it's a bloody good idea.
Norway are thinking outside of the box when it comes to reducing fossil fuel consumption.

Our government wouldn't dare do something like that, they love the revenue from the oil too much.
I absolutely agree.
The motorist must be the highest taxed group in this Sceptered Isle, and as such would have the biggest political voice, (if they wanted it).

Despite this governments hidden laws and bills it would still be possible to bring the country to its knees within days if we all stopped buying Petrol!
Therefore starving them of tax.

If they follow Norways lead here, I for one, would be happy to run on ethanol.

Roy
You'd be happy if you found some, there's not much about. Is that what the Norwegians are proposing?

thunderbelmont

2,982 posts

247 months

Friday 25th May 2007
quotequote all
When we say "running on ethanol", it'll be E85 which is 15% guzzoline, simply because conventional engines would be a bitch to start on pure ethanol without a starter what whizzed it over at 2000rpm or thereabouts.

Morrisons are flogging E85 at their supermarket pumps in some areas, and are rolling it out across their estate.

Shell are close to committed to rolling out E85 pumps in the near future.
BP and ESSO are following suit - Esso probably faster because their tie-up with Greenergy.

To achieve the CO2 targets that the Government has committed itself to, they could change the spec of unleaded from E5 (as it is now) to E15 or E20. Most cars could run on a 20% blend of bio-ethanol with little or no modifications. I feel that over 20%, you'd need to consider replacing the fuel lines with stainless steel, removing all rubber from the fuel system (Ethanol eats rubber!)

With a 20% blend of Bio-ethanol, you immediately reduce the fossil fuel CO2 emissions by 15% over current levels (for motor transport).

Make all of those red tins, and black slugs in the capital run on Bio-Diesel, which would not only be good for the air quality, it would be good for the buildings - no more black soot particulates.

So much they could do, if they wanted to.

If the government decree that it will happen, then the fuel companies will roll out the pumps.

And to save the environment further, ban all Toyota Pius's and Lexus hybrids. Those half-tonne nasty batteries will need replacing ever 5-7 years, and they are very very toxic and very nasty for the environment, out weiging anything that they might achieve by running on electrickery with no infernal combustion engine running.

I can't wait for the MrFusion home energy reactor. 1.21 Gigawatts from a couple of old banana skins and the dregs from a 7up tin.


Rich-UK

1,431 posts

279 months

Friday 25th May 2007
quotequote all
Genius. Oil rich company not using as much oil = more to export = more money!

GT500

7,211 posts

227 months

Tuesday 5th June 2007
quotequote all
If its only effecting one place, i.e Norway, you might as well avoid the place if you have unleaded or diseal car.

thunderbelmont

2,982 posts

247 months

Wednesday 6th June 2007
quotequote all
You're all right with a weasel car. It'll be fine on bio-diesel.

kfozz

94 posts

238 months

Wednesday 6th June 2007
quotequote all
Has anyone tried running a classic engine on E85 with lead substitute added as my TVRs havn't even moved onto unleaded yet or would the ethenol destroy parts of the fuel system. Also my Taimar has a foam filled tank fitted in the late 80s, does anyone know if the foam filling would be attacked.

Zoom_Jones

858 posts

282 months

Thursday 7th June 2007
quotequote all
GT500 said:
If its only effecting one place, i.e Norway, you might as well avoid the place if you have unleaded or diseal car.
That's some good advice right there.

Timberwolf

5,374 posts

241 months

Thursday 7th June 2007
quotequote all
They're massively ahead of us on looking for ways to reduce fossil fuel usage without shitting on everyone's quality of life, but there you have the difference between government with a societal conscience, and the lot we've been left with who care only about the wellbeing of themselves and a few select friends, regardless of what happens to the rest of the country.

It's the kind of thing you'd never see here, one of the biggest arguments of the anti-car lobby (pollution, limited resources, etc.) would implode overnight, remember they don't want solutions they want a fight.

OPEC are already rattling sabres and shooting across the bows, apparently if the world starts using biofuels the price of drilled oil will go up - oh really? - which is a threat to any would-be monopoly-breakers if ever there was one.

herewego

8,814 posts

236 months

Thursday 7th June 2007
quotequote all
Timberwolf said:
They're massively ahead of us on looking for ways to reduce fossil fuel usage without shitting on everyone's quality of life, but there you have the difference between government with a societal conscience, and the lot we've been left with who care only about the wellbeing of themselves and a few select friends, regardless of what happens to the rest of the country.
.
Do you think they don't have road tolls, fuel tax, annual road tax, vehicle purchase tax in Norway? Cars in Norway are twice the UK price.

ettore

4,861 posts

275 months

Thursday 7th June 2007
quotequote all
herewego said:
Timberwolf said:
They're massively ahead of us on looking for ways to reduce fossil fuel usage without shitting on everyone's quality of life, but there you have the difference between government with a societal conscience, and the lot we've been left with who care only about the wellbeing of themselves and a few select friends, regardless of what happens to the rest of the country.
.
Do you think they don't have road tolls, fuel tax, annual road tax, vehicle purchase tax in Norway? Cars in Norway are twice the UK price.
Also a little different with their population and density levels!

thunderbelmont

2,982 posts

247 months

Sunday 10th June 2007
quotequote all
kfozz said:
Has anyone tried running a classic engine on E85 with lead substitute added as my TVRs havn't even moved onto unleaded yet or would the ethenol destroy parts of the fuel system. Also my Taimar has a foam filled tank fitted in the late 80s, does anyone know if the foam filling would be attacked.
Firstly, you'd need to replace your rubbery fuel lines with stainless, the Taimar's tank would be eaten alive by the Ethanol. ATL recommend draining their tanks after each race meeting to prevent the degredation of the foam, and seals.

E85 has an equivalent octane approaching 110. To make best use of it, you should look at increasing your compression ratio. In the old days (when I was a little boy), they tell me that it was common to run racing motorcycles on "dope", ie: Methanol. If the engine ran a 10:1 on petrol, you'd raise it to 11:1 or 11.5:1 on Methanol. That rule of thumb still applies, though you may find that 12:1 is fine with a spot of engine management on a fuel injected engine.

Isn't the Taimar a carb engine? (3.0V6) If so, it'll need a fairly big increase in the jet size. You can expect to pour as much as 30-40% more fuel into the engine, though you can get a big chunk more power back in return.

The easiest engines to make work on E85 are turbocharged, with management systems that have good knock sensing, ie: can be set for E85, but will lean it off, and back off the timing when running on guzzoline (how Saab have done it).


Lutz

236 posts

268 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
Great, no more fossile fuels used...and what then? Electric cars...great, more coal burnt and more nuclear waste....bio ethanol? Guys, already today, we have a massive water problem on this planet. Bio-ethanol is a massive step in the wrong direction...
What about wind-powered cars...land-jachts, kind of

flattotheboards

6,688 posts

229 months

Wednesday 13th June 2007
quotequote all
its a great idea and hopefully other countries will follow suit.

skinny

5,269 posts

258 months

Thursday 14th June 2007
quotequote all
bio-ethanol has a long way to go before it's a good idea, certainly in terms of CO2. bio-diesel is a little better but not much. the only reason biofuels are getting so much exposure is because governments are pushing it. and trust me they aren't pushing it cos it's actually going to save the planet, they are pushing so that they can be seen to be doing to something green.

herewego

8,814 posts

236 months

Friday 15th June 2007
quotequote all
skinny said:
bio-ethanol has a long way to go before it's a good idea, certainly in terms of CO2. bio-diesel is a little better but not much. the only reason biofuels are getting so much exposure is because governments are pushing it. and trust me they aren't pushing it cos it's actually going to save the planet, they are pushing so that they can be seen to be doing to something green.
It looks as though there won't be much available anyway so we need to slash consumption.

francush

13 posts

225 months

Friday 15th June 2007
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Is this true ?

If so, it isn't going to help dispel the "All that twilight makes them mental" rumours...
Thats true, Every one I have met from Norway seem a bit, eeerr, disturbed!