Golf Goes On The Green
VW plans super-frugal Golf
Volkswagen is about to make the ‘Green Bandwagen’ even bigger.
Carrying on from its range of ultra frugal BlueMotion cars, Volkswagen will display a newBlueMotion specced Golf at the Frankfurt Motor Show later this year.
Based on the 1.9 TDI, the Golf joins the Polo and both Passat saloon and estate versions in the BlueMotion range. It’ll do 62.7mpg (compared with the TDI’s 56.5mpg) and will emit 119g/km in CO2 (compared with 132g) - making VW one step closer to the EU’s 2012 target of 130g/km average CO2 emissions.
More importantly for you, it means no Congestion Charge from next year.
They’ve done it by changing several things on the car. Mechanically, they’ve increased the gear ratios to lower the engine speed and they've modified the engine management system.
Outside, the body has been lowered, the grill has been closed off and the underbody of the car has been tidied up.
The Golf BlueMotion will go on sale in Germany later this year for €20,615 (£13,990), although we'll only know the UK prices nearer the car's arrival in 2008.
So a frugally and slower driven older model in theory is just as good.
When will they realise that CO2 is roughly proportional to fuel consumed which is pretty much proportional to your chosen vehicles economy and the way and amount you drive it.
Fuel tax. Nah, far too simple.
Rag this around in a lower gear because it's got longer gears and it'll be no better than the one it's based off!
Dave
But the cynic in me thinks that all this is clever tweaking to find loopholes in current government legislation. I'm sure that these engines bench tested in lab conditions will do what they say. But in the real world, with a 'normal' driver who is not constantly thinking about fuel consumption, will the CO2 be any different to any other TDI golf? I for one don't get within 25% of my car's claimed mpg.
Not knocking the efforts, just not convinced of the real-world CO2 benefits either.
Mind you, as a punter, its worth it for the lower tax, insurance and no CC
weight is a big prob on modern cars, as we demand more. nice car though still.
I see diesels every day putting out black soot, which has to be worse for the environment than CO2.
Isn't the O-Zone supposed to be closing up now?
This whole green house gasses/global warming is just like the millennium bug, lets make some big bucks.
How much pollution does a volcanic eruption put out?
How come in Medieval times, we had vineyards at the very North of England?
They have shown that thousands of years ago, it was hotter in England, with stranger climates, than it is now.
Sure it is important than we keep our contamination of this fantastic world down to a minimum, I also agree on that, but what really annoys me is the constant drivval of "green house this and that", when we have Nuclear waste we can't dispose of properly, Diesels of 30 year old busses kicking out crap like no tomorrow all over the world (India/China, etc) and we STILL have coal power plants.
It's just all out of proportion and not enough is done in the right area.
Maybe I'm totally misinformed?
As it is, I put the blame for the boom in Diesel passenger cars sales directly at the door of ignorant, artificial politics - they increase the tax on petrol, raise levels of tax on the "worst" CO2 polluters and people start ditching petrols - the manufactures respond to falling sales figures by rushing to develop Diesel and launch cars such as this VW, re-spun as Eco-Friendly and planet saving, when in real life, this shopping wagon will be steaming particualte smoke by 10,000miles old.
I think you'll find that manufacturers resent having to make Diesel such a priority because they cost far more to develop than petrol equivalents and it is more common to see Diesel engines written off earlier in their lives when they break, owing to expence of repair and complexity (imagine the pollution generated in dismantling all those old motors...think of the children etc etc etc).
And finally, there exist scientific communities who refute and disagree with the sacred cow view on C02. The difference is that the government won't engage with them.
No politicians are involved in this information.
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/...
Also coming soon to a diesel near you...
http://www.ecotravel.org.uk/fuels_8.html
http://www.saffil.com/diepar.htm
There are loads of other sites with info on DPFs.
Being green does not cost money, it saves it. The more efficent you are the less you consume, and your bills go down. If your car is efficient you are taxed less, your fuel bill goes down (less tax to the gov.) and you avoid congestion charges. If its a "lets make some big bucks idea" its a shit idea.
No politicians are involved in this information.
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/...
Dave
No politicians are involved in this information.
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/...
Also coming soon to a diesel near you...
http://www.ecotravel.org.uk/fuels_8.html
http://www.saffil.com/diepar.htm
There are loads of other sites with info on DPFs.
Being green does not cost money, it saves it. The more efficent you are the less you consume, and your bills go down. If your car is efficient you are taxed less, your fuel bill goes down (less tax to the gov.) and you avoid congestion charges. If its a "lets make some big bucks idea" its a shit idea.
You think Ken would immediately drop the congestion charge if cars could suddenly be powered by water and unicorn tears tomorrow? Like hell he would....its too good an earner. Tax is name of the game.
We will allways be taxed one way or another, unicorn tears or not, you can't avoid it, they will find a way!


Gassing Station | Motoring News | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






VW!