Never Rev Above 2000 On The Dial...
Never Rev Above 2000 On The Dial...
Author
Discussion

derestrictor

Original Poster:

18,764 posts

284 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all

r5gttgaz

7,897 posts

243 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
Honda drivers are gonna be screwed! LOL.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

293 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
Drive in fourth when you think third.

Right, so boocks to the concepts taught by IAM and RoSPA, we'd rather you're unsafe than polluting.

sayerbloke

307 posts

239 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
You do get the impression that it's only a matter of time before new drivers are taught that driving "economically" is more important than being safe...

Oh, and if you never took the engine above 2000rpm, you'd soon get to the stage where the injectors and so on were clogged and running inefficiently. Engines like to be taken across the whole revband every once in a while!

sclayto2

970 posts

232 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
Bit further down the page the gem:"speed limits will make fast cars less popular"

As I recall we have speed limits, pretty much Europe wide and Aston Martin were voted the coolest brand, recently.

Doesn't seem to of done them any harm.

Vipers

33,408 posts

251 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
Dont get much choice in my auto?


smile

number2301

508 posts

223 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
I drive a lot like it says day to day, no point using precious Super driving to the shops when I'd much rather be using it on the lanes!

D_G

1,891 posts

232 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
That's all the pensioners off the road then, none can park without at least 4000rpm.......

Dave

Brink

1,505 posts

231 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
So, let me get this straight.

As well as speed limits posted all over the shop, we now have rev-limits to look forward to? How would that work, exactly? You're driving along and you see a new "speed/rev" restriction sign in the shape of gordy's backside, 30/1800...

No, I just can't see it. It's far too gruesome.

Edited by Brink on Wednesday 14th November 21:31

Timberwolf

5,374 posts

241 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
Bit crap advice isn't it?

They've missed the one most important thing in driving that covers safety, progress and economy all in one: use your eyes to look ahead so you can anticipate and plan.

Why do the BBC always omit the provision Have Your Say or comments when they print rubbish?

SpeedyGonzales

7,211 posts

227 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
"How to drive

Car makers say we all need to learn how to drive in a more fuel efficient way.

Amongst the initiatives they support, one is called Eco Driving; courses where you learn how to use less fuel simply by driving a bit differently.

I went on one that was run by the firm Drivolution in Paal, a town about 50 kilometres north east of Brussels.

Before I hopped in the car, my instructor Eric Michiels said he could show me how to reduce my fuel consumption by some 8% - for good.

This is what he said I should be doing:

drive in fourth gear when your instinct says you should be in third
brake earlier
accelerate more slowly
do not ride the clutch
never rev above 2000 on the dial"

Since when did our society need to be taught how to drive?

I know theres some bad drivers out there, but telling you how to be eco-friendly takes the mick.

VYT

585 posts

285 months

Wednesday 14th November 2007
quotequote all
[quote=SpeedyGonzales "never rev above 2000 on the dial"

quote]

No problem my car only goes to 8 on the tacho :-)

zaktoo

805 posts

230 months

Thursday 15th November 2007
quotequote all
derestrictor said:
Do you even read what you link to before talking shit? How exactly is it communism when the car companies are blaming the drivers?

From the article:
"Car makers say we all need to learn how to drive in a more fuel efficient way."

>>plonk<<

Negative Creep

25,794 posts

250 months

Thursday 15th November 2007
quotequote all
zaktoo said:
derestrictor said:
Do you even read what you link to before talking shit? How exactly is it communism when the car companies are blaming the drivers?

From the article:
"Car makers say we all need to learn how to drive in a more fuel efficient way."

>>plonk<<
I'm pretty sure even Stalin's Purges didn't extend to those that drove at 2100rpm

SkinnyBoy

4,635 posts

281 months

Thursday 15th November 2007
quotequote all
who are these morons???

My car idles at 2000rpm so i'm ed then...

derestrictor

Original Poster:

18,764 posts

284 months

Thursday 15th November 2007
quotequote all
zaktoo said:
derestrictor said:
Do you even read what you link to before talking shit? How exactly is it communism when the car companies are blaming the drivers?

From the article:
"Car makers say we all need to learn how to drive in a more fuel efficient way."

>>plonk<<
You f@cking piece of sh1t.

The companies are playing politics but the political and media classes put this environmental crap on the menu.

I hope you fall off Table Mountain.

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

249 months

Thursday 15th November 2007
quotequote all
derestrictor said:
How is that communist, instead of just good old-fashioned stupid?

If anything, it's fascist.

Know Your Oppressor!

derestrictor

Original Poster:

18,764 posts

284 months

Thursday 15th November 2007
quotequote all
CJ, enjoy your political pedantry... whilst we plough about in rickshaws!

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

249 months

Thursday 15th November 2007
quotequote all
derestrictor said:
CJ, enjoy your political pedantry... whilst we plough about in rickshaws!
Hmm. Rickshaws. Now there's an idea. Scrotes need exercise and a job, I need to go to work. Everyone's a winner!

Seriously, though, I strongly suspect that the car manufacturers are doing the bare minimum of handwaving and looking-like-they-care in order to continue making proper cars. I don't think there's anything wrong with people being able to buy tiny, efficient cars.

I will be getting agitated if that's all people can buy, though. However, I don't think that that will ever be the case.

Mind you, if the day comes when I can have a nuclear-powered, 300BHP, 400-mile-range electric car (imagine a 4-door Tesla Roadster) then I'll be all over that like a rat up a drainpipe. Max torque at zero revs? Suit you, sir!

derestrictor

Original Poster:

18,764 posts

284 months

Thursday 15th November 2007
quotequote all
CJ, the media-political axis are running with this: it's a real danger...