RE: Stopping Ignorance
RE: Stopping Ignorance
Tuesday 23rd September 2003

Stopping Ignorance

Is it important to know the recommended stopping distance at 30mph? How relavent is it?


Author
Discussion

GreenV8S

Original Poster:

30,996 posts

305 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
What they don't say is, if you're already covering the brakes then the braking distance is only 12 meters, if you're caught by surprise (and have normal reactions) this doubles, if you're yacking on the phone and gawping at the shop windows you probably won't see the hazard until after you hit it. So what makes more difference - speed, or paying attention?

>>> Edited by GreenV8S on Tuesday 23 September 13:29

Swilly

9,699 posts

295 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
I dont think it matters if you know the distances because it is difficult to translate 20 or 50 or 100 metres into what you see on the road.

It would be better if you learnt what 20 or 50 or 100 metres looked like when travelling at various speeds so that you could maintain those distances.

jumjum

347 posts

279 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
They should put the odd useful add on the telly

Highlighting things from the highway code.

I also reckon that if they let people know that stepping into the road in front of a moving car was dangerous it might reduce accidents, nobody round my way seems to know about it !

Avocet

800 posts

276 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
I'm a bit worried that if everyone DID know the stopping distance AND could measure it accurately while driving, it would lead to people driving according to the "rules" rather than driving safely. It's the same mentality that says "70mph is safe and 80mph is dangerous". Other than under strictly controled test track conditions, I never seem to be able to get the same car to stop in the same distance twice! There are LOADS of factors governing how well a vehicle can stop and the numbers in the back of the highway code are a gross over-simplification. My vote would be to make people aware of the "average" distance (give or take half a dozen car lengths) but to emphasise the large variation one might encounter. Incidentally, for tests I have been involved in, a good sportscar with modern road tyres on dry tarmac can nearly HALVE these distances!

plucas1

14 posts

285 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
See, now you're going to start letting people making "judgements" and that's just plain dangerous.

What we need is a braking distance camera to catch all those too close/too far from the car in front the world would be a better place . The rules would be followed and no-one would have to think for themselves!

FourWheelDrift

91,633 posts

305 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
jumjum said:
They should put the odd useful add on the telly

Highlighting things from the highway code.


I still remember the "Only a fool breaks the 2 second rule" for motorway driving.

911newbie

611 posts

281 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
I did some simple math just before and I reckon those stopping distances are way off.
Anyone know where you can find stoppping distances for various types of car in various road conditions ? (ie measured not calculated) I did a few google searches and couldn't find much.

GreenV8S

Original Poster:

30,996 posts

305 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
EVO listed various braking distances in their 0-100-0 tests a couple of months ago?

gh0st

4,693 posts

279 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
Do I know the stopping distance at 30MPH? No.

Do I know to keep a safe distance back at 30MPH and as a result have never gone into the back of anyone? Yes.

jsr

1,155 posts

271 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
23 metres is a long way to stop from just 30mph.

I'm positive my car (Fiesta Zetec-S) stops way less than that. Probably more like the 12 metres/3 car lengths as mentioned in the article.

A TVR or Evo VIII or 911 with big powerful brakes must surely be even better.

The highway code needs to be updated.

Nightmare

5,277 posts

305 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
ditto...and additionally I couldnt indicate an object that was 23 metres away accurately! I know my father and other keen golfers are excellent at judging things like this...but personally I know I can't.... that said, I know EXACTLY what that equates to in my various cars when actually driving them....

jeremyc

26,819 posts

305 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
Using the braking data from the Autocar 0-100-0 tests and assuming constant decelleration (and that my maths/physics are correct ) it shows that most cars they tested would stop from 30mph in about 8 metres (the worst required 11 metres). This excludes reaction time.

Now clearly Joe Numpty doesn't always drive around in such exotica, but its still a long way from being a 23m stopping distance.

Oh, and for the record the best (a Caterham R500) would stop in 7.4m.

Cacatous

3,172 posts

294 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2003
quotequote all
Can anyone explain why the max speed limit for a van (7.5tonne) is 70+ on that site?

bor

5,067 posts

276 months

Wednesday 24th September 2003
quotequote all
I also don't know the distance and as has already been stated I couldn't relate that to anything whilst driving.

What is useful is to actually try an emergency stop from 30-60mph, particularly on a wet surface. It can be surprising how long it takes to stop.....

Once you have experience this I think you leave a greater gap to the car in front.......

wedg1e

27,002 posts

286 months

Friday 26th September 2003
quotequote all
As far as I know, 7.5-tonners aren't speed-restricted (yet ). My service manager has a MAN horsebox that will do 80+ with ease.

Ian