RE: Boris Considering Off-Peak C-Charge
RE: Boris Considering Off-Peak C-Charge
Monday 16th March 2009

Boris Considering Off-Peak C-Charge

Changes could make it cheaper to enter London during the day



The price to enter the congestion zone could be lowered outside of rush hour, it has been revealed. London Mayor Boris Johnson is considering varying the price during the middle of the day in a bid to help businesses inside the zone.

The idea is based on a scheme used in Sweden but would require extensive changes to the way the London C-Charge is operated. Johnson is also considering varying the charge depending on how much carbon dioxide a vehicle emits.

One suggestion is that drivers are charged a small amount every time they enter the zone, although the maximum is capped, and at off-peak times the rate is half the price. The system would use a chip in the vehicle which is picked up by scanners when the vehicle enters the zone.

During a consultation to see if Londoners agreed with the Western extension to the scheme they were also asked about potential changes. Options included applying a peak rate in a similar way to how public transport works.

A spokesman for the Mayor said: 'The basic rate will not go up, this was a manifesto commitment, so if we were to do anything we could lower it which no motorists would object to. There would have to be a premium rate for certain types of vehicles at certain times of the day.

'What we have always said is that we want to make it easier for people to pay the charge, and the work that Transport for London has been getting on with since the consultation is to implement a payment account. The idea of variable payments is something they have been looking at as part of that.'

Author
Discussion

Mr Gear

Original Poster:

9,416 posts

212 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
Congestion charge. A charge to prevent congestion.

What the hell has that got to do with CO2? I hate the policy-shift and false branding.

Just drop it! The constant tweaking it has had proves that no-one is satisfied.

node

732 posts

222 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
'The system would use a chip in the vehicle which is picked up by scanners when the vehicle enters the zone'

Hell no! don't even think about coming anywhere near my car with that chip.

Scrap the whole stupid system.

tim2100

6,288 posts

279 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
I thought Boris was going to drop the C-Charge?

350Matt

3,861 posts

301 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
One step at a time this is pretty positive news

pdV6

16,442 posts

283 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
node said:
'The system would use a chip in the vehicle which is picked up by scanners when the vehicle enters the zone'

Hell no! don't even think about coming anywhere near my car with that chip.

Scrap the whole stupid system.
If they switch from ANPR to chip, surely all you'd need to do is remove the chip?

FourWheelDrift

91,715 posts

306 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
tim2100 said:
I thought Boris was going to drop the C-Charge?
There is probably still funding in place for other things in London that Ken put in place, removing the C-Charge immediately may take that funding away (if it was using potential C-Charge revenues). Any change or removal has to be incremental and must make sure there are no budgetary problems that could cause the cancelling of essential work and projects,

theno23

865 posts

232 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
I don't think Boris promised to scrap the C-Charge, but he did get in on a promise not to adopt the proposed change to £25/day for "gas guzzlers".

Edit to add:

If there's a chip and no ANPR involved, surely you could just get a mate with a exempt/low band car at the other end of the country to register, and swap chips.

Edited by theno23 on Monday 16th March 12:37

matmoxon

5,026 posts

240 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
node said:
'The system would use a chip in the vehicle which is picked up by scanners when the vehicle enters the zone'

Hell no! don't even think about coming anywhere near my car with that chip.

Scrap the whole stupid system.
I imagine it would be similar to the tag systems they operate on some toll roads in the US (Sun Pass in Florida), simply a card fixed to the rear view mirror (okay so I only saw it on CSI). So long as it is removable so that it is only used for CC purposes, I don't like the idea of being tagged like a dog, or criminal.

Matt

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

261 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
matmoxon said:
node said:
'The system would use a chip in the vehicle which is picked up by scanners when the vehicle enters the zone'

Hell no! don't even think about coming anywhere near my car with that chip.

Scrap the whole stupid system.
I imagine it would be similar to the tag systems they operate on some toll roads in the US (Sun Pass in Florida), simply a card fixed to the rear view mirror (okay so I only saw it on CSI). So long as it is removable so that it is only used for CC purposes, I don't like the idea of being tagged like a dog, or criminal.

Matt
Well, if you have a mobile phone and it's switched on while you are walking, cycling, driving, on a train, on a bus or whatever, your every move is known anyway. Each time you exit and enter a new cell (which aren't that large an area) it's recorded by the mobile phone company.

node

732 posts

222 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
pdV6 said:
node said:
'The system would use a chip in the vehicle which is picked up by scanners when the vehicle enters the zone'

Hell no! don't even think about coming anywhere near my car with that chip.

Scrap the whole stupid system.
If they switch from ANPR to chip, surely all you'd need to do is remove the chip?
IMO i think the ANPR system will be used in conjunction with the chip together with wireless networking. If the chip is disabled the ANPR will alert TFL that the chip associated with your number plate is not online and they will send the police to investigate why the chip isn't working.

Drift into a bus lane for a moment even if there is no CCTV watching and you're fined. Run a red light by accident and you're fined. Travel 1MPH over the limit and you're fined. Maybe eventually they'll start charging by the meter in London, who knows.

belleair302

6,995 posts

229 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
I live inside the Zone and think it would be a very positive move to have a flexible charge during the day. How this would work I am not sure, but businesses and shops are struggling with an £8 a day charge. Ever tried to get craftsmen or deliveries to your house in W1.....thought not!

Boris is doing his best for Londoners who already pay the most in the world for public transportation, car parking, property, eating, shopping etc. Anything to help ordinary people trying to get about must be seen to be a positive move.

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

275 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
At least he's listening, that's a significant improvement over the previous post holder's policies and suggests a democratic approach! yes

Horse_Apple

3,795 posts

264 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
Good idea.

Maintain the current rate for most cars during the rush hour, but introduce the following:

Outside of the morning and evening rush hours, absolutely everyone get’s charged 50% less, £4. whether it is midday or midnight. Use the additional 24 hour revenue to partially offset the cuts in other areas.

Only charge the biggest cars the full £8. Don’t use Ken’s list which targeted almost anything that wasn’t a pedestrian, but target, say, 2.5L and above, thus protecting the average family car.

I do suspect that there are several key London projects intended to be financed by these revenues meaning it is not possible to scrap altogether 

IPAddis

2,502 posts

306 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
Horse_Apple said:
...target, say, 2.5L and above, thus protecting the average family car
It's a conjestion charge. Use the vehicle length.

5-litre V8 Smart car = free.
1.2 litre Maybach = £25.

Ian A.


Horse_Apple

3,795 posts

264 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
IPAddis said:
Horse_Apple said:
...target, say, 2.5L and above, thus protecting the average family car
It's a conjestion charge. Use the vehicle length.

5-litre V8 Smart car = free.
1.2 litre Maybach = £25.

Ian A.
I think it was changed to being a CO2 charge to comply with the latest groovy, political fad and to hide the fact that it did nothing to ease conjestion. wink

Having a policy linked to the name, regardless of what it is this week would be too costly due to the regular rebranding and re-spinning of the name.

Obviously, this wouldn't happen if they just called it 'Take it up the dirtbox tax No 238'. biggrin

B10

1,360 posts

289 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
I work in Wembley and commute from near Brighton twice a week. Rail is £38 (return each per day), a season ticket is not viable. By car it is £12-15. I get really annoyed about penalising those that work with so called peak time pricing. Whereas Mrs Miggins who wants to go Harvey Nicks for lunch and a bit of shopping gets there cheaply.

Chas-Chiro

224 posts

241 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
This was supposed to be a congestion charge.!!!

It has nothing to do with engine size and engine size is not relative to polution. A 125 bike can create more polution than a 4X4. Check the emmisions on cars and bikes at your local MOT garage.

The chip is another way to enforce big brother monitoring.

Vote with your car and do as I do. Spend the money driving to somewhere else giving someone else the business and making a stand.

I have not gone into London since the introduction of the congestion charge. I didn't really like the place anyway, full trash and nowhere to park.

There's always somewhere else and someone else that wants your business. And get your friends and familly to come to you if that's where they live.

AT NO TIME SHOULD EMMISSIONS COME INTO CONGESTION.! One or the other.

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

261 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
Chas-Chiro said:
This was supposed to be a congestion charge.!!!

It has nothing to do with engine size and engine size is not relative to polution. A 125 bike can create more polution than a 4X4. Check the emmisions on cars and bikes at your local MOT garage.

The chip is another way to enforce big brother monitoring.

Vote with your car and do as I do. Spend the money driving to somewhere else giving someone else the business and making a stand.

I have not gone into London since the introduction of the congestion charge. I didn't really like the place anyway, full trash and nowhere to park.

There's always somewhere else and someone else that wants your business. And get your friends and familly to come to you if that's where they live.

AT NO TIME SHOULD EMMISSIONS COME INTO CONGESTION.! One or the other.
yes but the more congestion the more the emissions, so if you reduce congestions, the emissions are also reduced.

infradig

978 posts

229 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
I agree wholeheartedly with all comments regarding using the chip to 'enforce' con charge. One mustn't forget that just because Boris is an amiable nice but dim character,that the whole evil system is still in place and been run by the same left wing ,lentil eating ,lesbian.Islingites that newt boy put in place.
In the last 12 months I have paid these jobsworth scum £180 for heinous crimes such as stopping on a double yellow line for a couple of minutes (at 2.00am)in Soho,outside Ronnie Scot's whilst my wife and some friends got in the car- in the pouring rain! This was picked up by camera and the fine arrived a couple of days later.If they have chips pesumably with gps locaters,they won't even need camera operators.

AND7 F

58 posts

240 months

Monday 16th March 2009
quotequote all
I don't understand why this will be so difficult to enforce and will require chips etc?

At the moment if you are seen by the ANPR cameras in the zone between 7 and 6 then you owe £8

Just change that to

£8 between 7-10 and 4-6

£4 for 10-4


Am I missing something?