RE: Shelby Cobra Concept
RE: Shelby Cobra Concept
Tuesday 6th January 2004

Shelby Cobra Concept

600bhp V10 pays homage to the Cobra 427


Carroll Shelby recently started working with Ford again and the fruits of their labours were unveiled in Detroit.

Ford have played it sensibly with the development of the new Cobra. Rather than incur the huge costs of developing the car from scratch the car draws heavily on the design of the Ford GT - particularly the space frame, suspension and brakes.

The styling deliberately harks back to the great original using a large grille, the hood scoop, vertical bumper bars and stacked lamps front and rear. It's very definitely a modern looking car however thanks to its slab sided styling.

The big news is what's under the bonnet however. Ford engineers knew that a spiritual successor to the awesome Cobra 427 would require tarmac ripping power. That comes in the shape of a 6.4 litre, naturally aspirated V10 delivering 605bhp and 501 lb-ft of torque! Even the development car can manage sixty miles per hour in less than four seconds. The monster motor is coupled to a six speed transaxle by a 'torque tube'. This is simply a propshaft running that spins at engine speed connecting the motor to the gearbox. By mounting the gearing at the rear it's allowed the designers to keep the mechanicals from intruding into passenger foot space. There are no offset pedals in this car.

The car itself is basic. It weighs in at around 1360kg yet has no roof, no side glass and not even a radio.  "That’s the formula ," said Carroll Shelby. "It’s a massive motor in a tiny, lightweight car ."

Links: Cobra Links

Author
Discussion

Larco

Original Poster:

356 posts

291 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
Carol Shelby said:
"That’s the formula ," said Carroll Shelby. "It’s a massive motor in a tiny, lightweight car ."


Now where have heard that design philosphy before?
Blackpool perhaps

vodkakid

1,076 posts

293 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
Whoops!

squirrelz

1,186 posts

292 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
1360kg isn't light though is it.

Editted to say - add an average Yank and you're up to 1500kg

>> Edited by squirrelz on Monday 5th January 17:43

olly

2,174 posts

305 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
The Cerbera has a roof, side & rear windows, stereo etc etc & weights 1200kgs? (I'm talking real weight as opposed to TVR weight).....

Ok, so the new Cobra has a bit more power, but's no fly weight!

PetrolTed

34,461 posts

324 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
Larco said:

Carol Shelby said:
"That’s the formula ," said Carroll Shelby. "It’s a massive motor in a tiny, lightweight car ."



Now where have heard that design philosphy before?
Blackpool perhaps


Errr...

chassis

300 posts

287 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
Why does this car look so sad?
Can it see itself?

williamp

20,060 posts

294 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
Larco said:

Carol Shelby said:
"That’s the formula ," said Carroll Shelby. "It’s a massive motor in a tiny, lightweight car ."



Now where have heard that design philosphy before?
Blackpool perhaps


No. Molsheim. You're thinking of a pre war Bugatti...

ross

219 posts

305 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
I thought i noticed some chimera themes in there somewhere

in particular:
front - chimera?
rear 3/4 - chimera?
boot - griff?

LuS1fer

43,113 posts

266 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
It's been invited to the Ugly Bug Ball.

goo-goo-gjoob

812 posts

276 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
he's right, that grill does make it look sad.

ScoobyManchester

1,163 posts

283 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
What's the deal with those lights?

HarryW

15,783 posts

290 months

Monday 5th January 2004
quotequote all
ross said:
I thought i noticed some chimera themes in there somewhere

in particular:
front - chimera?
rear 3/4 - chimera?
boot - griff?


Whilst I don't necessarily agree with the direct comparasons above. I do think that it looks like it owes much more of its parentage to TVR than it does AC cobra, or is that just me agian

Harry

LuS1fer

43,113 posts

266 months

Tuesday 6th January 2004
quotequote all
I think most sports cars owe most of their parentage to the original AC Cobra, Griff included.

anonymous-user

75 months

Tuesday 6th January 2004
quotequote all
Sad. Maybe. But aren't we all. So if I had to, then I'd take one. As for weight, I can imagine that half of that is just the engine. The problem will be that to make it into production, the marketing guys won't accept a car without radio, a/c, side windows, cup holder, etc, etc - so then it will be sad AND fat!

james

1,362 posts

305 months

Tuesday 6th January 2004
quotequote all
I think it looks fantastic. Just like an updated Cobra should. I just hope it makes it to production (and at a sensible cost).

James

RichB

55,119 posts

305 months

Tuesday 6th January 2004
quotequote all
Carol Shelby really does take the biscuit! He behaves as if he alone created the entire AC phenomenon, the fact that they were one of Britain's oldest car manufacturers, established in something like 1908, seems to have entirely passed him by. 40 years ago he got lucky and built the Cobra by putting a Ford V8 into an AC Ace, now he would have us all believe he IS AC cars. Meanwhile driven by his massive ego and the business acumen of Attila-the-Hun he has again forced AC into receivership, this time most likely, for the final time. When will he be happy, who knows? But one wonders how many more of these Carol Shelby “inspired” ego trips we will have to endure, because sure as his 10 gallon hat probably holds 15, he will never graciously accept that there were three players in the creation of the Cobra and he was but just one of them. Rich...

dinkel

27,584 posts

279 months

Tuesday 6th January 2004
quotequote all
williamp said:

Larco said:


Carol Shelby said:
"That’s the formula ," said Carroll Shelby. "It’s a massive motor in a tiny, lightweight car ."


Now where have heard that design philosphy before?
Blackpool perhaps


No. Molsheim. You're thinking of a pre war Bugatti...

...................
Yep, this guy knows his history. There was life before TVR.

The good thing about the original Cobra was its no-nonsense concept: no hitech bits. Like an original 7 but then bigger.

Stig

11,823 posts

305 months

Tuesday 6th January 2004
quotequote all
"That’s the formula ," said Carroll Shelby. "It’s a massive motor in a tiny, lightweight car ."

That's also the formula for massive claims from US citizens who chuck them into the scenery

The Wiz

5,875 posts

283 months

Tuesday 6th January 2004
quotequote all
dinkel said:

williamp said:


Larco said:



[quote=Carol Shelby]"That’s the formula ," said Carroll Shelby. "It’s a massive motor in a tiny, lightweight car ."



Now where have heard that design philosphy before?
Blackpool perhaps



No. Molsheim. You're thinking of a pre war Bugatti...


...................
Yep, this guy knows his history. There was life before TVR.[quote]

If anything TVR ripped off Shelbys ideas ... mind you big engines were nothing new. Even earlier than Bugatti (most of which (aside from the Royale with its 12.7 litre Railcar engine) were relatively small displacement engines)




I give you the original Chitty Chitty Bang Bang ... Mercedes aero engine 20 or so litres!

charlieheard

6 posts

283 months

Tuesday 6th January 2004
quotequote all
OK, I'm sad, but the racer was Chitty Bang Bang, built and raced by Count Zborowski (or something like that) Chitty Chitty Bang Bang was the book by Ian Fleming and then the musical.

A race-car recipe in the 1920s was to take an old chassis (pre-WW1) and stick in an old aero engine (ex-WW1 aircraft). Seems like the recipe for the original cobra...