Refund
Author
Discussion

pauln35

Original Poster:

44 posts

284 months

Wednesday 26th February 2003
quotequote all


Sorry - no naming and shaming.

mcecm

674 posts

288 months

Wednesday 26th February 2003
quotequote all
Was that a phantom moderator at work?

PetrolTed

34,461 posts

324 months

Wednesday 26th February 2003
quotequote all
'twas me.

outlaw

1,893 posts

287 months

Thursday 27th February 2003
quotequote all

PetrolTed said: 'twas me.


no balls ted

pauln35

Original Poster:

44 posts

284 months

Thursday 27th February 2003
quotequote all
what happened to freedom of speech....it's only in members best interests....

PetrolTed

34,461 posts

324 months

Thursday 27th February 2003
quotequote all
Due to the difficulties involved with monitoring and moderating the forums, we have a simple rule that says no naming and shaming.

When naming and shaming, invariably one side of the story is put with the 'guilty' party often not knowing about the posting they have no recourse to reply or defend themselves.

As we don't want to get caught up in any legal arguments about defamation, we have that simple rule. Sorry, but that's the only way to protect ourselves and the reputations of reputable businesses.

www.pistonheads.com/gassing/rules.htm

pauln35

Original Poster:

44 posts

284 months

Thursday 27th February 2003
quotequote all
Absolutely understand, but the basis of the posting is factual.

PetrolTed

34,461 posts

324 months

Thursday 27th February 2003
quotequote all
Factual maybe, but the business affected might have a different case to put. Sorry, but that's the only way I can deal with these things without spending all day discussing the pros and cons.