Emissions fun
Emissions fun
Author
Discussion

Mags

Original Poster:

1,201 posts

308 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
I'm having fun & games with the MOT and emissions this year, the car is in great condition, cats etc etc but its not playing ball. Its in good hands and I know it will get sorted but I'm told the MOT just keeps getting tougher on emissions, I don't beleive the hc output has been decreased below 200 but the reading from Lambda's and so is required, if this is a continuing theme what's going to happen in the future? will there come a come where we just can't get our cars through?

Mags

Steve_T

6,356 posts

301 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
I don't think they can retrospectively toughen the standard. I have a mate who's an MOT tester, will ask for you.

FUBAR

17,065 posts

267 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
You need a friendlier MOT tester wink

Mags

Original Poster:

1,201 posts

308 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Be interested to know what he says as I was told that ( I think) they now need to see readings from the lambdas to prove the whole emissions loop functions as expected.

Fubar, Not sure how that works if the MOT machine has to record the results?
My car might be heading to Austec in the next few days for an 'MOT chip'

gruffalo

8,150 posts

255 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
FUBAR said:
You need a friendlier MOT tester wink
+1 there are plenty around.

FUBAR

17,065 posts

267 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Mags said:
Fubar, Not sure how that works if the MOT machine has to record the results?
No idea chap.


By strange coincidence, at my last MOT the Cerb had identical readings to a Renault Clio. How odd confused


:cough:

Mags

Original Poster:

1,201 posts

308 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
FUBAR said:
No idea chap.


By strange coincidence, at my last MOT the Cerb had identical readings to a Renault Clio. How odd confused


:cough:
Penny drops.....

ridds

8,372 posts

273 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Emissions rules come MoT time for our cars do not change.

You either have:

a) A problem
b) An MoT station with better more accurate kit than before.
c) An MoT tester who has been felt up recently by VOSA.

You readings should be within the following.

CO <=0.3%
HC <=200ppm
Lambda 0.97-1.03

Idle CO <=0.5%

Post up what you have and may be able to give you hint of where to look.

Mags

Original Poster:

1,201 posts

308 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
ridds said:
Emissions rules come MoT time for our cars do not change.

You either have:

a) A problem
b) An MoT station with better more accurate kit than before.
c) An MoT tester who has been felt up recently by VOSA.

You readings should be within the following.

CO <=0.3%
HC <=200ppm
Lambda 0.97-1.03

Idle CO <=0.5%

Post up what you have and may be able to give you hint of where to look.
The garage is convinced there is a problem, but they are having a hard time finding it and have been speaking to a couple of Cerb experts. It may be off to Austec for a look at the map as all other avenues have been a dead end so far. On a TVRCC RR day last year at Austec Paul did say the fuelling was terrible but as it produced good power and runs well It hasn't been touched. Having said that, it's managed to get MOT'd for past several years so its more likely there is a problem somewhere than a map issue from the factory as I beleive it would have just left with a standard one right?
I don't have figures to post but it is fouling up plugs easily at low RPM so somethings wrong. Luckily its not costing me money to investigate, the garage are doing this so I'm not complaining or worried at the moment, just more interested in if the MOT is getting tougher which 2 different garages have told me, perhaps incorrectly.

Mags

brakedust

1,059 posts

238 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Amazingly mine has VERY similar readings to a boxster 3.2.

shpub

8,507 posts

301 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Test data--------------------------------------------------------------------------------CO RPM RPM CO HC Lambda Fast idle RPM
TVR Cerbera, Cerbera Straight 6, Tuscan Speed 6, Tamora, T350 & Sagaris 4.2l 0.5 900 1000 0.3 200 0.9 1.2 2500 3000
TVR Cerbera, Cerbera Straight 6, Tuscan Speed 6, Tamora, T350 & Sagaris 4.5l 0.5 900 1000 0.3 200 0.9 1.2 2500 3000

The above data is from Vosa at http://www.dft.gov.uk/vosa/inserviceexhaustemissio...

Note the relaxation on the lambda values for these engines. They should be tested to these specs not the standard 0.97 to 1.03.

ridds

8,372 posts

273 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
shpub said:
Test data--------------------------------------------------------------------------------CO RPM RPM CO HC Lambda Fast idle RPM
TVR Cerbera, Cerbera Straight 6, Tuscan Speed 6, Tamora, T350 & Sagaris 4.2l 0.5 900 1000 0.3 200 0.9 1.2 2500 3000
TVR Cerbera, Cerbera Straight 6, Tuscan Speed 6, Tamora, T350 & Sagaris 4.5l 0.5 900 1000 0.3 200 0.9 1.2 2500 3000

The above data is from Vosa at http://www.dft.gov.uk/vosa/inserviceexhaustemissio...

Note the relaxation on the lambda values for these engines. They should be tested to these specs not the standard 0.97 to 1.03.
That's interesting,it contradicts the info on their test requirement flowchart but I'm not going to argue!!! laugh

Will keep a copy of those values handy.

Autogasm

146 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
FUBAR said:
No idea chap.


By strange coincidence, at my last MOT the Cerb had identical readings to a Renault Clio. How odd confused


:cough:
I wonder if your MOT tester knows you're broadcasting things like this all over the net??? May not be as helpful next time???

Dave 500

7,882 posts

271 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
I was talking to a MOT tester the other day and he was saying the powers that be might be installing CCTV in every MOT station to stop people playing the system......

robsco

7,875 posts

205 months

Wednesday 7th March 2012
quotequote all
Autogasm said:
I wonder if your MOT tester knows you're broadcasting things like this all over the net??? May not be as helpful next time???
He has only made the statement that his Cerb has the same emissions results as a Clio... What do you think he is suggesting?


wink

Autogasm

146 posts

228 months

Saturday 10th March 2012
quotequote all
robsco said:
He has only made the statement that his Cerb has the same emissions results as a Clio... What do you think he is suggesting?


wink
Well I am sure that he's not implying a Clio was tested 'instead' of his car as that would be a really stupid thing to plaster all over the net!!! Or a Porsche for that matter!!! Unbelievable

Gazzab

21,637 posts

311 months

Saturday 10th March 2012
quotequote all
Yeah the police are following up the evidence right now. I suspect if Nick looks out the window he might see a couple of guys outside the house on a stakeout, sitting in a mondeo and pretending to read the paper. Suggest Nick makes an exit via the kitchen door, over the fence and through a neighbours garden. Maybe start a new life in south america.

spongy

2,236 posts

190 months

Saturday 10th March 2012
quotequote all
laugh

FUBAR

17,065 posts

267 months

Sunday 11th March 2012
quotequote all
I'm genuinely fearful for my life.

C3BER

4,714 posts

252 months

Sunday 11th March 2012
quotequote all
Hello hello hello and what do we have here Mr FUBAR. Do my eyes deceive me or is that a 1.2 Clio under your bulging bonnet. No guv it's 3.2 inches in my boxers wink