red rose
Author
Discussion

al 350i

Original Poster:

974 posts

219 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
i'm sure this might have been asked before so if anyone has a link please direct me but was curious to know how much quicker the red rose cerb is and what the specs are .....bhp (real world), 0-60, top speed (was it much over the standard 4.5 capabilities), did they have close ratio boxes (what's the gain to having one)

greenracing

259 posts

195 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Mainly more bhp ( a claimed 440bhp) than the standard 4.5 (what ever that was!!) and a 95/97ron button, but with aftermarket mods like short induction, decats a sorted map etc, I think a non red rose 4.5 or 4.2 would be just as quick as a factory red rose 4.5 with no other mods.

Last time my RR was on the dyno it was under performing and put out only 398 but that was with a knackered diff (now sorted), a buggered/blocked cat (now sorted) and the cam timing a little off. Just got the cam timing to sort now I have new dial gauges so that I can get it re-tested.

Gazzab

21,583 posts

306 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Best from mine was 436 I think.....

dean_ratpac

1,582 posts

302 months

Friday 25th January 2013
quotequote all
Gazzab said:
Best from mine was 436 I think.....
Mine is around here - any more I just I was chasing numbers.

Certainly more of an animal - out of the 3 i've owned that is.


...Although - dare i say i've been driving around in a 56 plate SLK AMG, and quite getting used to the comfort, and ride including 7 speed box.


al 350i

Original Poster:

974 posts

219 months

Saturday 26th January 2013
quotequote all
are all red rose's the same? was there a particular list of what you got and how much the upgrade was or was it a case of the customer could pick and choose what they wanted!

also from what year was the upgrade available or could you just take a 4.5 back the the factory and have it upgrade even if it was an earlier car?

gutu12

606 posts

300 months

Saturday 26th January 2013
quotequote all
Had a reg 4.5 and a Red Rose L/w in my time (the one in the classifieds now actually). The Red Rose was noteably quicker IMO.
Much, much quicker than my current Tuscan.

al 350i

Original Poster:

974 posts

219 months

Saturday 26th January 2013
quotequote all
you sound like you wish you'd never sold it smile the tuscans a great looking cars though!

gutu12

606 posts

300 months

Saturday 26th January 2013
quotequote all
al 350i said:
you sound like you wish you'd never sold it smile the tuscans a great looking cars though!
Had this same conversation with the current seller this week.
We can all relate to there always being A particluar car at some point in our lives. That car for me was THE car.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Sunday 27th January 2013
quotequote all
I asked what was the upgrade cost a week or so ago but no answer I'm afraid.

The red rosé cars where known as "special or special engines" on the production line.

My car has every option you could have from new making it a very special car indeed smile

greenracing

259 posts

195 months

Sunday 27th January 2013
quotequote all
The factory cost for the red rose conversion was £4000 on the nose (in 2002).

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Sunday 27th January 2013
quotequote all
Thank you for that information. If I tot up everything the first owner paid he obviously had deep pockets and I thank him for it smile

dempsey

297 posts

234 months

Tuesday 29th January 2013
quotequote all
My late 2001 4.5 LW RR Factory Build Sheet says :

Raised Compression ratio (no figures stated)
3 angle valve seats
Re-worked and polished ports
Balanced combustion chambers
Optimised cam timing
Re-shimmed cam followers
Upgraded head gaskets
ECU EPROM chips (?)
ECU 95/97 octane switch

(not sure what items like 'optimised cam timing' actually mean; just
copying the paperwork)

This cost an extra £3290 on top of the new car price.

al 350i

Original Poster:

974 posts

219 months

Tuesday 29th January 2013
quotequote all
that's not too bad for the price!

they didn't do anything to brakes, suspension or gearbox then? it was just engine work. i've read that the tuscan red rose got a close ratio gearbox, but no idea on cost or what power gains were though.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th January 2013
quotequote all
Different discs with lovely bells smile

al 350i

Original Poster:

974 posts

219 months

Tuesday 29th January 2013
quotequote all
ding dong!

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th January 2013
quotequote all
And I need some more frown or is that smile

jackwibble

664 posts

183 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
My 2000 4.5Lw has nice bells as standard?
The main difference is much better mapping than standard 4.5 so giving closer to the claimed BHP outputs especially if you use high octane juice and push the button also a bit of porting work and higher CR the latter two giving minimal gains 10-15 bhp.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Discs are bigger

Gazzab

21,583 posts

306 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
My red rose has the normal rubbish Tuscan res rose drilled disc's. Thought that was what a red rose comes with (and all later cerbs)?
I have a set of early 4.5 bells which I intend to add the larger after market AP discs to sometime.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Wednesday 30th January 2013
quotequote all
Ill find out what they are later but the originals are bigger. The last true pair came from power and I got them a few years ago. T2 are the replacements which you mention. I'm looking at a new set on Tuesday.