LW - how much lighter?
LW - how much lighter?
Author
Discussion

Chilliman

Original Poster:

12,311 posts

185 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
I'm sure the answer to this is buried somewhere in the forum, but despite efforts through google and other TVR sites I can't find it.... So apologies for asking a question that most Cerb owners will probably already know, but what weight saving does the LW actually offer? (Appreciate that not all Cerbs, or other model Tivs will weigh exactly the same as their sister cars).

Ta muchly,

Chilli smile

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
The true LW, maybe a bag of spuds but because they became an arse to paint they are now chips. I think there are only 6 true light weights out there. 99% advertised LWs are confused owners thinking they have one.


Chilliman

Original Poster:

12,311 posts

185 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
Bag of spuds? chips? smile

Thanks Mike,

R.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
I'm going to guess you've found a cerbera smile

Chilliman

Original Poster:

12,311 posts

185 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
No, not yet, but I'm looking at the various classifieds on an almost daily basis at the moment, and doing as much reading as I can smile Oddly, the Cerb was what I had my sights on before I bought the Chim, and it was a bit of a last minute swerve as I owned an MGBGT V8 at the time and for some reason that made alot of sense then I decided to stick with an engine I had some experience of. I think it's worked out as I've learnt a huge amount about TVR ownership without having to start from scratch on the engine side of things, which, being a compulsive modifier forever in search of more power has turned out to be a positive thing. I've spent bucket loads on the Chim, and will continue to do so to keep her 100%, but it's definitely time now for a Cerb smile And for the same reason the Chim had to be a 500, the Cerb has to be a 4.5, silly maybe, but I can't help it biggrin

R.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
I fully understand that. When I bought mine from TVRmads, James had a lovely 4.5 but my 4.5RR just said daddy take me home smile

And I knew I was going to buy it 100 meters away as we drove up to it.

sonnylad

1,165 posts

249 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
No such thing as a light weight cerb, it's a myth.

plus they weight more than 96/97 models.

Mark.

11,104 posts

300 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
I reckon a good hefty fart before getting in might shave off the same sort of weight.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
sonnylad said:
No such thing as a light weight cerb, it's a myth.

plus they weight more than 96/97 models.
There was LWs made but they became impossible to paint because of the flexing. The confusion of cars becoming called light weights rather than the few made was the new shaped cars which as you say are heavier.

grahamn

1,777 posts

258 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
Only TVR could make a LW which is heavier than a normal car laugh

dempsey

297 posts

234 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
sonnylad said:
No such thing as a light weight cerb, it's a myth.

plus they weight more than 96/97 models.
Nonsense.

As usual there's a load of tosh spouted on this old chestnut subject.

There are six 4.5's (most of which are also Red Roses) which were made lighter than
the standard 4.5 at that time by using a lighter resin lay up on some of the panels.

My late 2001 LW RR (No.B001050) Factory Build Sheet specifies 'Light Weight as per the Press Car'

Not all of the lighter panels were the same on each of the cars.

Some of them had paint trouble with the panels unduly flexing; mine looks as pristine as when
it left the factory.

If you contact nemasis on this forum (was at Automedon - don't know about now) he has all the
factory build/specification details for all cars and can confirm if a car is a true Factory LightWeight or not.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
Yep as I said six made and I think only three kicking around still and only one with a good paint job smile

Very rare cars indeed.

tvrukRaj

89 posts

200 months

Wednesday 20th March 2013
quotequote all
dempsey said:
sonnylad said:
No such thing as a light weight cerb, it's a myth.

plus they weight more than 96/97 models.
Nonsense.

As usual there's a load of tosh spouted on this old chestnut subject.

There are six 4.5's (most of which are also Red Roses) which were made lighter than
the standard 4.5 at that time by using a lighter resin lay up on some of the panels.

My late 2001 LW RR (No.B001050) Factory Build Sheet specifies 'Light Weight as per the Press Car'

Not all of the lighter panels were the same on each of the cars.

Some of them had paint trouble with the panels unduly flexing; mine looks as pristine as when
it left the factory.

If you contact nemasis on this forum (was at Automedon - don't know about now) he has all the
factory build/specification details for all cars and can confirm if a car is a true Factory LightWeight or not.
If a car was 4B001056 - was year could it be?

Mad Mark

2,345 posts

256 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Mine is a LW and if you compare the weight of lifting the bonnet to mine compared to a normal Cerb there is a massive difference. The doors and boot you obviously can't compare as they are hinged or held up but boot stays.

I have yet to weigh the whole car one day I will get round to it.

Mad Mark

2,345 posts

256 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Mad Mark said:
Mine is a LW and if you compare the weight of lifting the bonnet to mine compared to a normal Cerb there is a massive difference. The doors and boot you obviously can't compare as they are hinged or held up but boot stays.

I have yet to weigh the whole car one day I will get round to it.
I am not saying that there is a massive difference with the whole car weight just the bonnet as thats the only part I can compare.

C3BER

4,714 posts

247 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Can you press them in with your hand and do the same with the boot lid?

Because they warped when being painted they got junked and normal bonded ones put on. A classic TVR, "they will never know" attitude. smile

M3John

5,974 posts

243 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Also, don't a lot of people get a little confused with the initials LW as some of the later cars had a Large Window, as in front screen ?

Mags

1,196 posts

303 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
The answer about lightweights and LW's is here:
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=3&a...

Mr Cerbera

5,148 posts

254 months

Friday 22nd March 2013
quotequote all
M3John said:
Also, don't a lot of people get a little confused with the initials LW as some of the later cars had a Large Window, as in front screen ?
As far as I have been able to ascertain, there was no difference in the size of the window glass. The series 1 had a thicker boarder which made the viewable area smaller (and also became known as the "letterbox" windscreen.

HTH thumbup

Mr Tank

5,797 posts

299 months

Friday 22nd March 2013
quotequote all
Hi

At last people are realising that the LW is a myph (Apart from the originaly 6) The myph has been drement up by sales people to hype up the cars and there values.

Andy