TVR Cerbera. Poor Man's Supercar...
TVR Cerbera. Poor Man's Supercar...
Author
Discussion

aide

Original Poster:

2,277 posts

188 months

Sunday 24th November 2013
quotequote all
Really?

Jhonno

6,430 posts

165 months

Sunday 24th November 2013
quotequote all
Not a chance..

scotty_d

6,795 posts

218 months

Sunday 24th November 2013
quotequote all
Yes you buy one, spend a few years spending on it then you are skint hehe

F1SERB

460 posts

177 months

Sunday 24th November 2013
quotequote all
I wasn't but i am now !!!

chibbard

1,554 posts

284 months

Sunday 24th November 2013
quotequote all
Wise man's supercar in my opinion.

Erich Stahler

2,878 posts

294 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Thrifty man's supercar, not really expensive enough and lack some refinements of a true supercar, but sure kicks arse way above its price bracket.

esso

1,849 posts

241 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
A Cerb can be bought for Mondeo money,it cannot be ran on a Mondeo budget.Pound V Performance you can't beat a Cerb,10 times as much money can easily be spent to achieve similar performance.I have a Mondeo......and a Cerb.....and I know which one I would rather be driving for 20k.

aide

Original Poster:

2,277 posts

188 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
It's mentioned just over halfway down the page on this article. I've never thought of it like that at all.. I just seen one parked outside a corner shop around 9 years ago and wanted it!

davidd

6,670 posts

308 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
I think that TVR showed that it is possible to build a Supercar for sensible cash. It is a shame that the QA was not a bit better though, I'm sure they could have sorted out the obvious weaknesses with only a mild increase in the initial cost.


V8 GRF

7,298 posts

234 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Working man's Supercar I think was the term, which is something very different.

Byff

4,427 posts

285 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
aide said:
It's mentioned just over halfway down the page on this article. I've never thought of it like that at all.. I just seen one parked outside a corner shop around 9 years ago and wanted it!
Useless advice in that blog, doesn't impart a single bit of knowledgeable information.

aide

Original Poster:

2,277 posts

188 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Byff said:
Useless advice in that blog, doesn't impart a single bit of knowledgeable information.
Yeah, it's not the best, I came across it while searching for ride height information.

esso

1,849 posts

241 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Byff said:
Useless advice in that blog, doesn't impart a single bit of knowledgeable information.
I have just read it,and couldn't agree more!

m16kcy

38 posts

219 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Atleast nobody disputes the fact that a tvr cerbera is indeed a supercar! And anyway how many poeple with a Ferrari have gone bankrupt in the past? Would those people be not described as poor in that circumstances?

ellum

38 posts

162 months

Tuesday 26th November 2013
quotequote all
V8 GRF said:
Working man's Supercar I think was the term, which is something very different.
+1 !

Mr Cerbera

5,148 posts

254 months

Friday 6th December 2013
quotequote all
V8 GRF said:
Working man's Supercar I think was the term, which is something very different.
Unemployed man's Hypercar is the term used in this household wink

900T-R

20,406 posts

281 months

Friday 6th December 2013
quotequote all
Well, in its day you needed 'an F50, F1 or a pretty fast bike' ( (c) Top Gear magazine) to catch it, it handed a Viper and a supercharged vantage their a***s both for outright performance and handling in a direct comparison (there was also a Cobra in that test, but the less said about that the better) and the drama/exclusivity factor was there also... and it showed the Italians and all the would-be supercar makers with fantasy prices that if you have got to build something crazy fast and a bit flaky/temperamental, you'd better do it at a reasonable price to compensate for the ensuing running costs/heartbreak. wink

esso

1,849 posts

241 months

Friday 6th December 2013
quotequote all
900T-R said:
Well, in its day you needed 'an F50, F1 or a pretty fast bike' ( (c) Top Gear magazine) to catch it, it handed a Viper and a supercharged vantage their a***s both for outright performance and handling in a direct comparison (there was also a Cobra in that test, but the less said about that the better) and the drama/exclusivity factor was there also... and it showed the Italians and all the would-be supercar makers with fantasy prices that if you have got to build something crazy fast and a bit flaky/temperamental, you'd better do it at a reasonable price to compensate for the ensuing running costs/heartbreak. wink
Like it....great post! thumbup

DKL

4,879 posts

246 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
I have an old Top Gear, 2000 ish, which did a group test of , iirc, 550, 996t, vanquish, zonda, amg sl500? and a green red rose 4.5 cerb.
Sadly the cerb did not equate terribly well in build quality or handling but the comment on pace was amusing, something along the lines of "if you see this green monster in your mirrors do the decent thing and get the fk out of the way whatever you are driving". Its just easier that way!

Gazzab

21,576 posts

306 months

Sunday 8th December 2013
quotequote all
DKL said:
I have an old Top Gear, 2000 ish, which did a group test of , iirc, 550, 996t, vanquish, zonda, amg sl500? and a green red rose 4.5 cerb.
Sadly the cerb did not equate terribly well in build quality or handling but the comment on pace was amusing, something along the lines of "if you see this green monster in your mirrors do the decent thing and get the fk out of the way whatever you are driving". Its just easier that way!
Think they equated the engine noise to that of a lawn mower! Have that mag somewhere....