The Cerb V8
The Cerb V8
Author
Discussion

chilli

Original Poster:

17,320 posts

265 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
A quick question if I may.... Was watching some Clarkson programme the other day, when he was talking about "some V8" engine which a variety of cars use/used.....Including Rover, Morgan and quite a few others that I've forgotten.
My question is do the other makes suffer from the reliability issues that the Cerb does, or are there other reasons for this?
Cheers.

tootall Paul

938 posts

276 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
Cerbs dont have reliability Problems !!!!!!

tootall Paul

938 posts

276 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
Cerbs dont have reliability Problems !!!!!!

Nickccc

1,682 posts

277 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
He was refering to the rover (buick (sp)) v8 as found in the Chimera (allbeit somewhat different) land rovers, morgans

chilli

Original Poster:

17,320 posts

265 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
Buick....That's the one.....Different engine then!
Cheers for that.

spartacus

2,878 posts

299 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
I think your talking about the "ROVER v8" as opposed to the AJP8 (high revving flat plane crank v8) which is fitted in the cerbera and is TVRs own engine! completely different kettle of fish old chap!

chilli

Original Poster:

17,320 posts

265 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
Riiiiggghhhttt.... So does this mean that as I was put off buying a Cerb, due to the running costs, that these woulld be significantly cheaper for a Chim?! Now I'm thinking.........

njw 77

17,065 posts

267 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
My griff (nee Chimaera) running costs where about £1k p.a. (admittedly didnt do many miles in it p.a) whilst the cerb has already cracked the £3k barrier in 9 months (but I have had some 'extras' done to it)

Chims/Griffs will be considerably cheaper to run than a cerb (yes, there's always the exceptions), but then I havent factored into the equation the following additional expenses;

Add to Griff ownership: Gold chains/chest wig and buying into hairdressing salon.

Add to Chim ownership: Set of Calloway golf clubs, golf club membership/green fees, many 'lake' golf balls....oh and all the Pringle clobber

Nickccc

1,682 posts

277 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
Chilli, if you want a Chim I have a 2000 4.0 for sale,
37,000 miles FTVRSH full magnolia leather, leather dash ,doors ect, V8 plate maybe thrown in,
What do you think it is worth? Full history file aswell lovingly looked after. 12 disc pioneer cd in boot, rear speaker upgrade (not two dustbin lid jobs)
Nick

>> Edited by Nickccc on Friday 15th April 13:52

kojak

4,547 posts

282 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
spartacus said:
I think your talking about the "ROVER v8" as opposed to the AJP8 (high revving flat plane crank v8) which is fitted in the cerbera and is TVRs own engine! completely different kettle of fish old chap!




The AJP V8 is actually a reliable engine. (I bet I break down now). It tends to be other parts of the car that can be unreliable, such as the electrics. Having said that, it is a special car, and I dont think its only akin to TVR Cerberas.

chilli

Original Poster:

17,320 posts

265 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
Nick, I have no idea! Only just had the thought about 10 mins ago! Might bear it in mind though, after a tad more research!
Cheers though.

gazzab

21,627 posts

311 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
go for a 4.5 or 5 ltr Chim OR a 5ltr griff.

chilli

Original Poster:

17,320 posts

265 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
Think I prefer the Chim...with the headlight conversion....But wouldn't know about the engine differences...Praps I should think about moving this post to the Chim forum!

19560

14,332 posts

287 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
spartacus said:
flat plane crank


What other sort of plane is there? (Waits for stupid jokes about wings.)

>> Edited by 19560 on Friday 15th April 14:28

spartacus

2,878 posts

299 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
19560 said:

spartacus said:flat plane crank



What other sort of plane is there? (Waits for stupid jokes about wings.)

>> Edited by 19560 on Friday 15th April 14:28


Ok Mr grammar pedant - flat-plane crank, that better?

19560

14,332 posts

287 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
spartacus said:

19560 said:

spartacus said:flat plane crank



What other sort of plane is there? (Waits for stupid jokes about wings.)

>> Edited by 19560 on Friday 15th April 14:28



Ok Mr grammar pedant - flat-plane crank, that better?

No. It's a superflous word issue. Should be flat crank or more correctly plane crank. In plane if you like. Flat and plane are the same thing.

spartacus

2,878 posts

299 months

Friday 15th April 2005
quotequote all
19560 said:
spartacus said:

19560 said:
spartacus said:flat plane crank



What other sort of plane is there? (Waits for stupid jokes about wings.)

>> Edited by 19560 on Friday 15th April 14:28





Ok Mr grammar pedant - flat-plane crank, that better?


No. It's a superflous word issue. Should be flat crank or more correctly plane crank. In plane if you like. Flat and plane are the same thing.



Ok, thinking about it you do have a point there, however a google search on "flat-plane crank" returns 552 hits which seems to indicate that it is a term that is commonly used even if it not 100% syntactically accurate.