What are implications of using Unleaded 95 octane
What are implications of using Unleaded 95 octane
Author
Discussion

harty

Original Poster:

42 posts

251 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
.......fuel now and again? It's a bugger trying find the right fuel sometimes.

Cyclone1

2,614 posts

275 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
Buy some octane booster and keep it in the boot for when you can't find a petrol station with Super.

kevin63

4,661 posts

282 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
If the engine starts pinking on low octaine then take it steady untill you can put some booster in or fill up with high octaine.

daver

1,209 posts

313 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
I can't speak for the early car 4.2s but on ones like mine ('99 4.5) there's no need to use 98 RON. The ignition timing is very conservative and is absolutely fine with 95. In fact, aside from any additional detergents in fuels like Optimax, there's no real benefit in using it. It's not like you've got a knock sensor advancing the timing to within an inch of the engines life to take advantage of the higher octane. Optimax users might cite benefits in other areas but as far as any increased power is concerned, there's a large element of emperor's new clothes.

As far as I'm aware, on the 4.5's only the factory Red Rose cars with the dual maps and the 95 - 98 dashboard switch actually *need* 98 (with the switch in the appropriate position).

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
I use 95 almost all the time. When I first got the car I used 98, but really not much difference between the two unless you are are a road mapping warrior.

Interesting thing I got in a cerb about two weeks ago (not someone who comes on PH), and couldn't believe how he was driving the car. High throttle and low revs with a fair amount of load on the engine at slow revs. The car was pinking like a bastard, and he didn't bat an eyelid. It was difficult to comment on his driving because he was doing me a favour and I didn't know him that well, but I nearly threw up after getting out of the car.

I think it doesn't really matter whether you use 95 98 or nitrous in your car, I think what matters is your sensitivity to what the engines telling you when you drive.

gbbird

5,197 posts

273 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
I try to use optimax or 98 where poss, but if there is none around i put 95 in mine (1998 4.5) and there seems to be no difference whatsoever.

>> Edited by gbbird on Monday 21st November 10:52

robertjp

2,281 posts

254 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
There is a sticker next to my filler cap that says use 98 RON only?! I can only assume this was not a factory thing...

Its a 99 4.5.

Wiggyfella

131 posts

251 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
Whereas mine has a sticker recommending me to use 95 RON unleaded. It doesn't say 'at least 95 RON unleaded either'. John at David Gerald also said that 95 is fine.

I've not noticed any difference between 95 and 98, having used both so far.

Mine's a 99 Speed Six.

Cheers.

robertjp

2,281 posts

254 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
Wiggyfella said:
Whereas mine has a sticker recommending me to use 95 RON unleaded. It doesn't say 'at least 95 RON unleaded either'. John at David Gerald also said that 95 is fine.

I've not noticed any difference between 95 and 98, having used both so far.

Mine's a 99 Speed Six.

Cheers.


Right, i am going to start using 95, its cheaper!!! You cant be far from me Wiggyfella, using David Gerald?

carl_w

10,735 posts

287 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
You have a hand-built, thoroughbred car then run it on the cheap stuff? Mine has a "Use 98 RON only" sticker on it and I've only ever used Optimax or (more recently) Tesco 99RON Super.

I used to use Optimax when I was doing 30k miles/year in a Scoob -- it's better for the engine as it cleans the valves (I saw the report in Evo where they used a borescope) and it gave about 10% better MPG.

What next, Halfords oil because it's cheaper?

ozzie dave

574 posts

277 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
I use 98 Premium on our SAAB Turbo , and 95 unleaded (E10 10% ethanol blend ) for the Mitsu V6 , I do about 100,000 Miles Per year , The 95 E10 gives better economy , performance (yes I know it shouldn't) and no pinking (got that with the 91 , and even sometimes if I use 95 straight) It seems to be subjective to the vehicle though .Have been working this way for a number of years.

robertjp

2,281 posts

254 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
carl_w said:
You have a hand-built, thoroughbred car then run it on the cheap stuff? Mine has a "Use 98 RON only" sticker on it and I've only ever used Optimax or (more recently) Tesco 99RON Super.

I used to use Optimax when I was doing 30k miles/year in a Scoob -- it's better for the engine as it cleans the valves (I saw the report in Evo where they used a borescope) and it gave about 10% better MPG.

What next, Halfords oil because it's cheaper?


Correct me i f i am wrong but wasn't the conclusion here that it didn't make any noticable difference? I am only going on experiences listed here...

Halfords Oil is a different story.

carl_w

10,735 posts

287 months

Monday 21st November 2005
quotequote all
Well it made a difference of about 10% on my Scoob. I was doing the same journey every day (and filling up every other day) so it was relatively easy to see.

daver

1,209 posts

313 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2005
quotequote all
carl_w said:
You have a hand-built, thoroughbred car then run it on the cheap stuff? ...What next, Halfords oil because it's cheaper?


No, Millers CFS because there *is* benefit to be derived from a quality lubricant.

If there's no benefit to be gained from a higher RON fuel it doesn't still represent a better choice just because it's more expensive.

What do you use in your washer bottle - Evian?

carl_w

10,735 posts

287 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2005
quotequote all
The washer fluid is not fundamental to the operation of the engine, though...

As I said, it has a sticker saying "98 RON only" so that's what I do.

purpleheadedcerb

1,143 posts

251 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2005
quotequote all
Mines a 98' 4.2 and it also says 98 Ron only (although I'm now using 99!). For the sake of an extra £1.50 per fill up it's a no-brainer. We will have to see what the result of these independent tests are.

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2005
quotequote all
What independant tests?

purpleheadedcerb

1,143 posts

251 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2005
quotequote all
It was mentioned that EVO or someone was doing back to back in depth tests of 95, 97, 98 and 99 ron (incidentally, what happened to 96 RON??). I think its more scientific than the, "My car pops and bangs better on Sainsbury's 97" type tests that have been reported so far on PH!

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2005
quotequote all
purpleheadedcerb said:
It was mentioned that EVO or someone was doing back to back in depth tests of 95, 97, 98 and 99 ron (incidentally, what happened to 96 RON??). I think its more scientific than the, "My car pops and bangs better on Sainsbury's 97" type tests that have been reported so far on PH!



Is that on a Cerb?

purpleheadedcerb

1,143 posts

251 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2005
quotequote all
I don't think so. I'll see if I can find the thread. I'm sure it will include cars that are designed to run the higher octane fuel by the manufacturer.

BTW, I'm not saying you are wrong running yours on 95. It probably can run Ok on it just like most classics designed to run on 4 star leaded run fine on unleaded. All they tend to need is the timing retarded slightly to avoid pinking. Although, I am aware of someone in our club who ran a Sprint engine on unleaded and did alot of motorway mileage. It completely mullered his engine over 20k miles. Short, lower revving journeys seem to be fine though with unleaded.

Scott