Which Is Faster?
Which Is Faster?
Author
Discussion

panthro

Original Poster:

781 posts

247 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Hi, sorry to bother all of you but I am having an argument with someone at work. He says that the 4.2 is faster in a straight line than the 4.5 (cerb), I beg to differ. Please tell me I am correct Cheers.

Stevie Mojo

1,520 posts

266 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Not much in it apparently but the 4.5 is slightly quicker. It also has more scope for tuning and I WANT ONE NOW! Gonna trade my Chim in and get a 4.5 when I see the right one.

Duke Thrust

1,680 posts

268 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
All depends on car and state of tune.

I can only comment from experience, I test drove a load before buying and to me the clatter cam 4.2 seemed the quickest but this is just my subjective assessment. I have not driven any re-mapped cars so can't comment there. Either way, it seemed very little to choose from, maybe it was just the harsher cams in the 4.2 that made it seem (to me) to be more lively - perhaps they just suit my driving style.

Possibly the clatter cam thing is a myth, someone will be along to correct me no doubt, again from the cars I've driven it seems to be true.

In the past I have been told that the 4.2's are quicker to the tonne at which point the 4.5 will catch up and go past (but not amazingly quickly). Just what I've been told, so don't shoot me down

4.5's have more scope for upgrades, but a couple of posts in the last few days have hinted that this is all going to change as intake upgrades for the 4.2's are on the way.

What colour is fastest, now there is a question.

Edited by Duke Thrust on Wednesday 28th June 16:08

Ratten

223 posts

252 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Blue

Stevie Mojo

1,520 posts

266 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Please don't turn it into another "which colour is fastest?" thread, that old chestnut is starting to do me head in.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

290 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
You are correct.

4.5 officially 0-60 3.9sec 0-100 8.1sec top speed in excess of 195mph
4.2 officially 0-60 4.2sec 0-100 9.9sec top speed 160mph


In reality, there's probably very little difference.

beano500

20,854 posts

304 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Which one's the hire car?

gazzab

21,638 posts

311 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Easiest thing is to say they are the same. Different cars rather than different models are faster. Tuned 4.5s will be faster.
More important test is the skill of the driver on a track?

headcase

2,389 posts

246 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Stevie Mojo said:
Please don't turn it into another "which colour is fastest?" thread, that old chestnut is starting to do me head in.


Mod please delete this offensive post

Deffo blue

marcus1970

1,217 posts

264 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
panthro said:
Hi, sorry to bother all of you but I am having an argument with someone at work. He says that the 4.2 is faster in a straight line than the 4.5 (cerb), I beg to differ. Please tell me I am correct Cheers.

I'm sure a decent driver in a 4.2 could leave an average driver in a 4.5 looking at his rear number plate. However, bog standard 4.2, bog standard 4.5 same driver, I would think the 4.5 would have to be quicker...
MB

Duke Thrust

1,680 posts

268 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
gazzab said:
Easiest thing is to say they are the same. Different cars rather than different models are faster. Tuned 4.5s will be faster.
More important test is the skill of the driver on a track?


Agreed.

I think this is very curious, average power of a standard 4.2 (347.8 bhp) is higher than a standard 4.5 (342.9 bhp) - see below, taken from the old Joospeed site. With only a couple of BHP in it, it can explain why there seems to be so little difference in performance on standard cars.

Clearly when re-mapped with the standard intakes the 4.5 has a huge power advantage over the 4.2, I'm very interested to see what the 4.2 can make on upgraded intakes.

----------------------------------------------------

4.5 CERBERA

1.Ceejay……… 392 bhp - 364 lbs torque (Joospeed engine mods/Emerald)
2.Satman……… 377bhp - 369 lbs torque (Joospeed Emerald)
3.Cyclone……… 375bhp - 365 lbs torque (Joospeed Emerald)…. see note below
4.Angusfaldo……365bhp – 352 lbs torque (Joospeed standard)
5.Katanarog…….365bhp – 345 lbs torque (TVR Factory's Red Rose upgrade)
6.PaulH…………353bhp – 325 lbs torque
7.MarkJ…………352bhp – 326 lbs torque
8.Blue4.5………...348bhp – 344 lbs torque
9.Richard………..346bhp – 348 lbs torque
10.PetrolTed……...345bhp – 342 lbs torque (Topcats)
11.GCerbera………342bhp – 318 lbs torque
12.Cooperturbo……338bhp – 320 lbs torque
13.Bennett24……...337bhp – 332 lbs torque
14.John.s………….336bhp – 335 lbs torque
15.Neilus………….332bhp – 338 lbs torque (Austec injector clean)

Cyclone’s first run, in standard form, made 339 bhp – 338 lbs torque, which when changing the ECU to a Joospeed Emerald, with a map copied from Satman’s Emerald ECU, made +36bhp and +27 lbs torque gains.

4.2 CERBERA

1.Carbon Al. …….360bhp – 320 lbs torque (Emerald ECU)
2.Longbow……… 359bhp – 330 lbs torque
3.Slvrcrb………. 351bhp – 332 lbs torque
4.Jonnie5……….. .348bhp – 333 lbs torque
5.David.S………... 345 bhp – 327 lbs torque
6.Jellie…………… 336bhp – 340 lbs torque

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
For a 4.5 to make 195mph, first you would have to have balls the size of coconuts, then hold your foot to the floor for about half an hour between 170mph to get it to 180mph.

Then you would have light a pretty big firework strapped to your roof, and a few seconds before the firework or the engine went bang you might see 182

phil green griff

248 posts

245 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Julian64 said:
For a 4.5 to make 195mph, first you would have to have balls the size of coconuts, then hold your foot to the floor for about half an hour between 170mph to get it to 180mph.

Then you would have light a pretty big firework strapped to your roof, and a few seconds before the firework or the engine went bang you might see 182


If thats the case 4.2s are quicker

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
phil green griff said:
Julian64 said:
For a 4.5 to make 195mph, first you would have to have balls the size of coconuts, then hold your foot to the floor for about half an hour between 170mph to get it to 180mph.

Then you would have light a pretty big firework strapped to your roof, and a few seconds before the firework or the engine went bang you might see 182


If thats the case 4.2s are quicker


Only if you have one of those new fangdled exaggerometers on your dashboard.

phil green griff

248 posts

245 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
What one of those gps thingys, seriously i hit 180 in my 4.2 with no problem before it was chipped then 189, and remarkably for a TVR the speedo was only one mph out at 100

cossiemetro

1,092 posts

269 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
especially the blue ones

dean_ratpac

1,582 posts

307 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
panthro said:
Hi, sorry to bother all of you but I am having an argument with someone at work. He says that the 4.2 is faster in a straight line than the 4.5 (cerb), I beg to differ. Please tell me I am correct Cheers.


RR 4.5's are the fastest! blue ones too

gazzab

21,638 posts

311 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
I fouind the acceleration to 185 ok - didnt seem to take that long to get from 170 to 185.

spartacus

2,878 posts

299 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
Ratten said:
Blue


ZZZZZZZZZZ!

itsallyellow

3,877 posts

249 months

Wednesday 28th June 2006
quotequote all
same here accelerates fine to at least 180.