My GT, sadly for sale
My GT, sadly for sale
Author
Discussion

h19 jjm

Original Poster:

162 posts

271 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
Thought i would mention it on here first before i put it on the classifieds, but its got to go to fund the business. If anyone's interested mail me and i will send you the spec and details.
Im looking for offers and i will not give this peice of TVR history away.

BCA

8,651 posts

286 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
Is this *the* 4.5GT in Viola Pearl? If so... someones going to get themselves a very special car. thumbup Good luck with the sale.

h19 jjm

Original Poster:

162 posts

271 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
The colour is Lamborghini Diablo Purple with brand new anthracite spiders, it looks really well.

BCA

8,651 posts

286 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
h19 jjm said:
The colour is Lamborghini Diablo Purple with brand new anthracite spiders, it looks really well.


Lamborghini Viola Pearl.

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
A truly, mindcrushingly bad time to sell a 'special' TVR.

Are you sure you can't hold on to it for a while?

h19 jjm

Original Poster:

162 posts

271 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
I will if i dont get what i want for it, and raise the money from the house.
I'm already getting an earbashing from the wife about increasing the mortgage but needs must.
It will break my heart to see it drive away.

marcus1970

1,217 posts

264 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
h19 jjm said:
I will if i dont get what i want for it, and raise the money from the house.
I'm already getting an earbashing from the wife about increasing the mortgage but needs must.

It will break my heart to see it drive away.


Post some pics, I'd like to see it!

MB

SI-PEN

1,009 posts

266 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
Excuse me for asking, but how do you know your's is a 4.5GT?

This is a new one on me, are there any markings to say it's a GT or am I missing the point?

My Early 98 4.5 has 4.5GT on the ECU Chip which is all standard and original, are they not all like this?

Sorry for the "twenty Questions" I'm just intrigued!

Ta
Si

h19 jjm

Original Poster:

162 posts

271 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
Do a search on the cerb forum from the 12th june under 'GT' there are pictures and the explanation of the car there.

BCA

8,651 posts

286 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?p=1&f=&t=42021&h=0

To save you all searching... looks ace. Would love to know the differences, but I suspect a few of them are something people may want to keep quiet.

Cyclone1

2,614 posts

275 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
BCA said:
www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?p=1&f=&t=42021&h=0

To save you all searching... looks ace. Would love to know the differences, but I suspect a few of them are something people may want to keep quiet.


thumbupSome good pics in that thread, I especially like the one of the purple 4.5GT Cerb next to that sexy silver 4.5FF Cerbhehe.........................and it really is a proper GT...........the same as the silver one being a FF Cerb

Jules.

HarryW

16,028 posts

298 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
It was never really answered in the last thread but what power was it putting down on the road confused

gazzab

21,639 posts

311 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
Why has the purple one got later front and rear lights plus later number plate recess?

SI-PEN

1,009 posts

266 months

Monday 23rd October 2006
quotequote all
gazzab said:
Why has the purple one got later front and rear lights plus later number plate recess?


Looks like it must have been updated, but why recess the number plate unless it has had a shunt??

They weren't original like this so someone has spent a lot of money at somepoint, it would seem. Still can't see what the difference is, probably because I can't see under the bonnet!

Could the earlier ones be different just because they are earlier cars, not just because they were better/quicker?

I'm just asking the question before I get shot down in flames!

hbeck

424 posts

252 months

Tuesday 24th October 2006
quotequote all
Wish I had enough room in the garage for two Cerbs

www.pistonheads.com/sales/108947.htm

and some spare cash to buy it as well!

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

290 months

Wednesday 25th October 2006
quotequote all
That is certainly not the only purple GT. There was one at Peninsula a couple of years back. I drove it, and it felt no different to my 4.5. In fact it had the arse driven out of it by various people (allegedly).

My 4.5 looks identical to that GT, except it's Paris Blue and mine too has 'GT' on the ECU.

I think nearly every Cerbera was probably a 'development' model and there are very few genuine limited editions. The GT's are a genuine limited run, but because of the hand built in a shed nature of these cars I reckon every single one is slightly different.

Shame the GT has to be sold, but how much of a premium would it command really?

BCA

8,651 posts

286 months

Wednesday 25th October 2006
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke, ours has a GT engine number and such... it also had completely different top front damper mounting points which allowed rear damper sizes to fit the front. I count this as an experimental car (its a Nov 97) - and Joolz has spent more than enough time all over our car/ knows it very well-he does not refer to this as a 4.5GT. I am yet to speak to him about the GT properly yet, but from what he was implying in the other thread, it would seem there are alot of *significant* differences on this car to warrant him referring to it as a GT.

I would be interested to know the exact build date of this car/ anyone with a GT ECU or Engine number.

BossCerbera

8,188 posts

272 months

Wednesday 25th October 2006
quotequote all
My 4.5 was ordered as a "GT" and all its sale documents refer to it as such. When it came round to delivery, "GT" had become "4.5". It's beyond question that Jim's car is a "GT" and is different from production 4.5s.

The "GT" was supposed to be 420bhp, Joolz got mine very close to that number and after a different rear exhaust box was fitted, it exceeded it. It's not a "Red Rose" car and has never been twiddled with until Joolz got it this year.

HarryW

16,028 posts

298 months

Wednesday 25th October 2006
quotequote all
BossCerbera said:
My 4.5 was ordered as a "GT" and all its sale documents refer to it as such. When it came round to delivery, "GT" had become "4.5". It's beyond question that Jim's car is a "GT" and is different from production 4.5s.

The "GT" was supposed to be 420bhp, Joolz got mine very close to that number and after a different rear exhaust box was fitted, it exceeded it. It's not a "Red Rose" car and has never been twiddled with until Joolz got it this year.

yikes Boss if you are saying that with a remap and a bigger back box your 4.5 is 'standard' and porduces in excess of 420bhp then.............

BCA

8,651 posts

286 months

Wednesday 25th October 2006
quotequote all
I thought you had got to "just" 413bhp*?

* a question one can only ask where the mighty AJP is concerned. hehe

Wonder what joolz could get out of ours/ wonder what he has got out of ours? eek Doubt it'l come close to that though, it was only ever "average" to start with (it was one of the first 4.5's to hit the rollers... it hasnt been on them in atleast 30k miles.)

Boss, what was the build date of your Cerb out of interest?

Edited by BCA on Wednesday 25th October 13:31