Show me yours-Underbonnet pics please!
Show me yours-Underbonnet pics please!
Author
Discussion

mongoose

Original Poster:

4,360 posts

284 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
Hi all,i need to see some underbonnet pics of 4.2 and 4.5 Cerbs please,can you help?If you dont have,or can't post a pic,usefull links would also be appreciated.Many thanks,Mike

mad mark

2,345 posts

261 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
Anything in particular you are after??

mongoose

Original Poster:

4,360 posts

284 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
mad mark said:
Anything in particular you are after??

Just some underbonnet pics for comparison for a possible project.Im particularly interested in the induction differences,but need the whole underbonnet area also.

mad mark

2,345 posts

261 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
Not a very good one, but its one I've already got uploaded.
Its from an early '95. Will post some others later.

cooky

4,955 posts

266 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all

mongoose

Original Poster:

4,360 posts

284 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
mad mark said:
Not a very good one, but its one I've already got uploaded.
Its from an early '95. Will post some others later.

Cheers Mark,thanks very much

BCA

8,651 posts

286 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
Mongoose, not got any pictures to hand, but have to say:







DO IT!!!!!

cooky

4,955 posts

266 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all


hope they help

mongoose

Original Poster:

4,360 posts

284 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
BCA said:
Mongoose, not got any pictures to hand, but have to say:







DO IT!!!!!
Thanks for the encouragement matethumbup

BossCerbera

8,188 posts

272 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all

mongoose

Original Poster:

4,360 posts

284 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for the contribution Cooky,thats really helpfull.Can someone tell me why the two induction systems are so different please?

spartacus

2,878 posts

299 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
4.2 engine.....


4.5 engine.....

arebrec

3,545 posts

252 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
this is cerby4.5's old cerb, hope he don't mind me linking it from his profile, but I think this looks gorgeous

TCS 'Whirlwind' Short Induction Kit

alinton

965 posts

265 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
And another with a TCS Whirlwind Induction kit, mine's a '99:



Andy.



Edited by alinton on Friday 9th February 20:27

mad mark

2,345 posts

261 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
I was just about to offer you a hand in uploading your pic, but now you've done it, I'll offer you a different kind of hand.

gazzab

21,640 posts

311 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
mad mark said:
Not a very good one, but its one I've already got uploaded.
Its from an early '95. Will post some others later.


Looks like (from the seats, induction and under bonnet panel) that it is an early 2000 car rather than an early 95 ?

raw cerb

603 posts

277 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all


ACT Kit on a 4.5

HarryW

16,028 posts

298 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
gazzab said:
mad mark said:
Not a very good one, but its one I've already got uploaded.
Its from an early '95. Will post some others later.


Looks like (from the seats, induction and under bonnet panel) that it is an early 2000 car rather than an early 95 ?

Seem to recall it was a bit of factory special before it was written off , check out the engine bay cover, its an early 4.2 arrangement, dash top vent missing too yes



Edited by HarryW on Friday 9th February 21:13

Fusion1

376 posts

239 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all


mad mark

2,345 posts

261 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
HarryW said:
gazzab said:
mad mark said:
Not a very good one, but its one I've already got uploaded.
Its from an early '95. Will post some others later.


Looks like (from the seats, induction and under bonnet panel) that it is an early 2000 car rather than an early 95 ?

Seem to recall it was a bit of factory special before it was written off , check out the engine bay cover, its an early 4.2 arrangement, dash top vent missing too yes

It was a factory Development car. Left the factory in 2005. It was a '95 model with various things changed on it.
Yes it was written off, (someone drove into me) but it was repaired and is still on the road as good as new.