Differences between 4.5, lightweight and Red Rose
Differences between 4.5, lightweight and Red Rose
Author
Discussion

pkoc

Original Poster:

126 posts

230 months

Monday 20th October 2008
quotequote all
Evening all. I've been looking into Cerbera ownership for a while now and have test driven a few 4.2's. However, following some recent posts by others about 4.2 cranks breaking (which I know is a fairly uncommon thing by all accounts), I have nevertheless widened my net to 4.5's.

However, the 4.5 models seems to have a few variations and I'm interested in understanding what the differences actually are, and what if anything, should be given more consideration.

Apologies for the newbie type question, and I know for example that the lightweight should be self explanatory. But for example, what components have been ditched or lightened to classify as a lightweight and how would I check it out/verify it?

Checking out the classifieds, the credit crunch is starting to dent prices slightly and whilst as a petrol head I don't want to gain from some else's loss (not to mention pride and joy), it does seem to be turning into a buyers market. So I am eager to know the differences in 4.5 specifications before I go and test drive any, as I don't want to waste anyones time. Appreciate you help.

amazon

3,704 posts

241 months

Monday 20th October 2008
quotequote all
I'm afraid I can't answer your question completely, so better that I don't show myself up by trying. However, have you tried a search on here? I am sure you will find the answers and some good reading into the bargain smile.

Good luck smile

BCA

8,651 posts

287 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
Lightweight are the heavier newer cars with the quad front lights. Red rose are the higher compression (amongst other little tweaks) 4.5s with more power as standard, the 4.5 non RR/pre LW is either quad headlighted or not, the earlier ones enerally proving to be real lighter weight cars. smile

The reality is, two identicle spec 4.5s are likely to be as different as say a LW v non LW... the RR is usually more powerful, but the gap can be closed with decent exhausts/ induction/ remaps. smile Buy the best you can find, if its a known car to us on here - all the better to understand how its been looked after.

All the best with it. thumbup

C3BER

4,714 posts

253 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
The Red Rose Lightweight will be the one in front, stirs pot with large wooden spoon.

Nefarious

989 posts

295 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
LW apparently designates "Large Windscreen" rather than "Lightweight", as despite having a slightly lighter bonnet (and no sun-visors?), they're actually 100-and-a-bit kg heavier (as a previous poster mentioned).

With either a 'cooking' 4.5 or a RR, you'll want to mod the intake and chip anyway, so I think the only significant engine difference is slightly higher compression in the RR.

Dirty Boy

14,865 posts

239 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
TVR made the 4.5 'Light Weight' by removing the sun visors.

Cheers

DB.

hehe


Seriously though, I believe the bonnet is lighter, but not much else. I think the later 4.5s from 2000 onwards had the option of quad pod lights, and from 2003, they were all blended?

As already mentioned, the red rose has higher compression and the switchable map for 95/97 octane.

The LW cerbs, generally aren't, although it's accepted, each one may be different. Someone a while back weighed their lightweight at over 1100kg, whereas their 1996 (?) cerb was well under 1100.

You could ask to put it on the scales prior to buying?




spants

1,089 posts

257 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
i found that there was better visibility out of the lw - is the windscreen rake/size different?.

The seats in the lw were nicer too...

Tony



Dirty Boy

14,865 posts

239 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
spants said:
i found that there was better visibility out of the lw - is the windscreen rake/size different?.

The seats in the lw were nicer too...

Tony
Yes the windscreen is slightly larger, and the seats look nicer, but they have a tendancy to break easily.

amazon

3,704 posts

241 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
C3BER said:
The Red Rose Lightweight will be the one in front, stirs pot with large wooden spoon.
wavey I don't know about that - a 4.2 in the right hands mostly views traffic from the rear view mirror tongue out

(Or did you think you might have got away with this comment? wink ).



Dirty Boy

14,865 posts

239 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
amazon said:
C3BER said:
The Red Rose Lightweight will be the one in front, stirs pot with large wooden spoon.
wavey I don't know about that - a 4.2 in the right hands mostly views traffic from the rear view mirror tongue out

(Or did you think you might have got away with this comment? wink ).

You're forgetting that men like to stay behind women for the view wink

900T-R

20,406 posts

287 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
Strange - I thought I had one of those in my rear view mirror between Adenau and Spa... tongue out

A very pretty sight it was too, mind...

amazon

3,704 posts

241 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
900T-R said:
Strange - I thought I had one of those in my rear view mirror between Adenau and Spa... tongue out
yes Yep, you did.

It was planned that way to protect the group. A leader and a tail end Charlie. TC was lead car thumbup

coffee

900T-R

20,406 posts

287 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
scratchchin

Must have worked then, no attacks from those pesky German P-cars when on our way! thumbup

In that case I owe you a beer or two for keeping us safe! driving

Oh and the coffee on the go was a nice touch, too... smile





Edited by 900T-R on Tuesday 21st October 12:19

pkoc

Original Poster:

126 posts

230 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
Thank you for the responses. My search will continue.

D1ckie

741 posts

220 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
Nefarious said:
LW apparently designates "Large Windscreen" rather than "Lightweight", as despite having a slightly lighter bonnet (and no sun-visors?), they're actually 100-and-a-bit kg heavier (as a previous poster mentioned).

With either a 'cooking' 4.5 or a RR, you'll want to mod the intake and chip anyway, so I think the only significant engine difference is slightly higher compression in the RR.
Then I must be the only person with a 4.2 LW as I have no sun visors either

D1ckie

741 posts

220 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
pkoc said:
Thank you for the responses. My search will continue.
What is your budget. I've just bought another 4.2 after looking for 6 months, so might be able to advise on what I found out there.

Hope this helps

And for what its worth i prefer the 4.2 smile

greenm

473 posts

230 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
Here is a LW 4.5 although new to TVR's it seems the bonnet, boot, and many other panels I have removed to date are carbon to keep the weight down but I agree they are meant to come in at about 1100kg although may stick it on the scales and see. Insides are real nice and mines a 2000 and seats have not brocken or look like they will reference to previous post? Sports Exaust, short induction and chip should give you close to 400 hp or a little more?




Dirty Boy

14,865 posts

239 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
greenm said:
seats have not brocken or look like they will reference to previous post?
greeny, I look at my seats and i'm convinced the side bolster as you get in looks very weak and would break fairly easily, the bit holding them on at the bottom doesn't look that substantial.

C3BER

4,714 posts

253 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
amazon said:
C3BER said:
The Red Rose Lightweight will be the one in front, stirs pot with large wooden spoon.
wavey I don't know about that - a 4.2 in the right hands mostly views traffic from the rear view mirror tongue out

(Or did you think you might have got away with this comment? wink ).

Dam dam dam...it only took a few posts, dam.

Gazzab

21,663 posts

312 months

Tuesday 21st October 2008
quotequote all
greenm said:
....a LW 4.5 although new to TVR's it seems the bonnet, boot, and many other panels I have removed to date are carbon to keep the weight down ....
Not seen or heard of a cerb before with carbon bonnet or boot. Carbon al and otehrs can make up carbon panels but never seen these beyond under engine or dashboard treatments.