Form or function?
Discussion
All the front suspension bits are now off the car, I've got five out of six stripped back to bright metal and I've got 2 and a half of the old bushes out. Hopefully the first coat of zinc will be going ontomorrow at some point.
Now I'm left with a decision about what top-coat to use. Having spent so bloody long getting them to the state they're in, I'd love it if there was a clear lacquer option, but that's just silly - but it has got me thinking about doing something other than the "zinc-stonechip-Tetracan gunk" option I used on the chassis.
Maybe just finish with a second coat of stonechip? Probably not as resiliant as using underseal, but would look a lot nicer than coating everything in black gunk.
Thoughts?
Now I'm left with a decision about what top-coat to use. Having spent so bloody long getting them to the state they're in, I'd love it if there was a clear lacquer option, but that's just silly - but it has got me thinking about doing something other than the "zinc-stonechip-Tetracan gunk" option I used on the chassis.
Maybe just finish with a second coat of stonechip? Probably not as resiliant as using underseal, but would look a lot nicer than coating everything in black gunk.
Thoughts?
Nefarious said:
All the front suspension bits are now off the car, I've got five out of six stripped back to bright metal and I've got 2 and a half of the old bushes out. Hopefully the first coat of zinc will be going ontomorrow at some point.
Now I'm left with a decision about what top-coat to use. Having spent so bloody long getting them to the state they're in, I'd love it if there was a clear lacquer option, but that's just silly - but it has got me thinking about doing something other than the "zinc-stonechip-Tetracan gunk" option I used on the chassis.
Maybe just finish with a second coat of stonechip? Probably not as resiliant as using underseal, but would look a lot nicer than coating everything in black gunk.
Thoughts?
I 'cleaned' up my chim suspension parts and painted them with er black gunk (under body seal) and whilst they will probably be fine even a few years from now, they didnt look good and small stones, debris etc stuck to them.Now I'm left with a decision about what top-coat to use. Having spent so bloody long getting them to the state they're in, I'd love it if there was a clear lacquer option, but that's just silly - but it has got me thinking about doing something other than the "zinc-stonechip-Tetracan gunk" option I used on the chassis.
Maybe just finish with a second coat of stonechip? Probably not as resiliant as using underseal, but would look a lot nicer than coating everything in black gunk.
Thoughts?
I now have a cerb and have cleaned up the suspension (chipped, ground, sanded, etc) the suspension in situ and am intending the paint the relevant parts in white to match the chassis / the origianl finish as best I can.
my vote - go for something that looks good and will prevent future rusting - stonechip (even if, protection wise, its not ultimately as good as black gunk!)
Any decent powder coating outfit will clean (acid dip) and alochrome the part before painting, http://www.staranodising.co.uk/alochrome.htm
I have sprayed quite a bit of powder coat. The company I worked for used to fabricate and paint all the steering houses, binnacles and such for a major supplier to the yachting industry. This stuff would be up on deck in ocean going craft. It will be good for suspension parts and such.
If only TVR had cleaned and coated the chassis before powder coating it.
I have sprayed quite a bit of powder coat. The company I worked for used to fabricate and paint all the steering houses, binnacles and such for a major supplier to the yachting industry. This stuff would be up on deck in ocean going craft. It will be good for suspension parts and such.
If only TVR had cleaned and coated the chassis before powder coating it.
Nefarious said:
JensenA said:
Send them off to get properly powder coated - it shouldnt cost too much.
Considered it, but IMO it's not as good as galvanising them, which is what I'm doing.Or they have one for a spay gun too.
I was trying to work out what you meant by "zinc-stonechip-Tetracan gunk" on my search I found your original post about the work you did on the chassis. Sorry to say but if you started the process off with Kurust you will be doing the whole lot again before too long regardless of what you put on the top. There isn’t any "rust converter" that actually works I’ve tried them all & regretted it every time. Also the zinc rich primer needs to be applied to the clean bare steel to work, not on top of the Kurust. There are lots of products now that really do remove the rust with out sand basting giving you that clean surface for the your primer. Although the best primer to use is an acid etching one.
Luckyone said:
I was trying to work out what you meant by "zinc-stonechip-Tetracan gunk" on my search I found your original post about the work you did on the chassis. Sorry to say but if you started the process off with Kurust you will be doing the whole lot again before too long regardless of what you put on the top. There isn’t any "rust converter" that actually works I’ve tried them all & regretted it every time. Also the zinc rich primer needs to be applied to the clean bare steel to work, not on top of the Kurust. There are lots of products now that really do remove the rust with out sand basting giving you that clean surface for the your primer. Although the best primer to use is an acid etching one.
I'm not using Kurust on the suspension, because I can strip everything down to bright metal. I used it on the chassis because there were quite a few bits I couldn't get to properly with a grinder/wire brush etc without lifting the body (e.g. top of the outriggers). Everything that could be filed right back was, and got a coat of Zinc 300 to clean metal. Absolutely everything I could get to with a brush/spray tin (both the zinc coated bits and the Kurusted bits) with stonechip and black gunk. Six months on (which admittedly isn;t very long), everythign still looks pretty healthy. Nefarious said:
Luckyone said:
I was trying to work out what you meant by "zinc-stonechip-Tetracan gunk" on my search I found your original post about the work you did on the chassis. Sorry to say but if you started the process off with Kurust you will be doing the whole lot again before too long regardless of what you put on the top. There isn’t any "rust converter" that actually works I’ve tried them all & regretted it every time. Also the zinc rich primer needs to be applied to the clean bare steel to work, not on top of the Kurust. There are lots of products now that really do remove the rust with out sand basting giving you that clean surface for the your primer. Although the best primer to use is an acid etching one.
I'm not using Kurust on the suspension, because I can strip everything down to bright metal. I used it on the chassis because there were quite a few bits I couldn't get to properly with a grinder/wire brush etc without lifting the body (e.g. top of the outriggers). Everything that could be filed right back was, and got a coat of Zinc 300 to clean metal. Absolutely everything I could get to with a brush/spray tin (both the zinc coated bits and the Kurusted bits) with stonechip and black gunk. Six months on (which admittedly isn;t very long), everythign still looks pretty healthy. 
But as for your original question, as you went back to clean steel on the front suspension bits, rubberised solvent based stone chip, like the one in my other post, on top of your primer will be just fine, it’s very tough stuff. If you want it to look better just spray over it in any colour body paint you like & if you really want it to shine spray over that with some lacquer. That’s more or less what production cars have now under the wings.
There’s no need to bother with black gunk on top, it doesn’t bond at all well & just covers over any trouble spots as well as sticking to every part of you when ever you go to work under the car again in the future…
caduceus said:
I took mine to the powder coaters. Got alot of stuff done so he did it for a good price, and I'm happy with the results. Now I'm on the lookout for some plastic trim to stick on the thin edges, where the powder coat normally flakes off from.

Very nice!
Although proper (not TVR
) powder coating is very good, probably better than any painting, I think don’t think our man will swayed from the DIY route, but I know where he’s coming from & still gets a As for your edges, I was on a different forum for my 200sx, where a guy suggested filing all sharp edges round before starting what ever coating process you were using. It increases the surface area of the contact patch on the edges & reduces the stress on the coating making it more resilient. Not tried it my self but sounds like a good idea. Bit late for you though, sorry, a theme seems to be developing here….
Looks very smart caduceus, I am undecided as to how to protect my wishbones. I had considered powdercoating but I dont think it will last that long.
I think what I am going to do is once the parts are grit blasted is apply...
http://www.frost.co.uk/item_Detail.asp?productID=8...
and then paint on this...
http://www.frost.co.uk/item_Detail.asp?productID=9...
and then because they dont have the above in white I would spray on some white paint.
Opinions??
I think what I am going to do is once the parts are grit blasted is apply...
http://www.frost.co.uk/item_Detail.asp?productID=8...
and then paint on this...
http://www.frost.co.uk/item_Detail.asp?productID=9...
and then because they dont have the above in white I would spray on some white paint.
Opinions??
Gassing Station | Cerbera | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






