Do I have a 4.5 or not
Do I have a 4.5 or not
Author
Discussion

jonbarrett

Original Poster:

800 posts

232 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Badge says 4.5, ECU says 4.5, induction looks like 4.5. Log book says 4.2, chassis number says 4.2, HPI says 4.2. How do I prove what I have, I need to know for the insurance. I've heard this can be a common problem with TVRs


Greeny

1,423 posts

289 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
What is the history of the car - from the previous owner/s
Could be a 4.2 car with 4.5 engine upgrade.

jonbarrett

Original Poster:

800 posts

232 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
I've got ther full service history, I'll can't see any suggestion of an engine replacement.

high52kojak

505 posts

227 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Get it mapped, see what it will push out

Jimmy_p

12 posts

221 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Not sure its any help but my '98 is exactly the same: appears to be a 4.5 in every way yet log book and chassis says 4.2. Sure I read somewhere that the factory didn't bother to register the 1st 4.5's correctly........quite why I have no idea rolleyes

jonbarrett

Original Poster:

800 posts

232 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
I had it on a rolling road last year and it showed 388bhp.

high52kojak

505 posts

227 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
I'd be inclined to think 4.5 then. Standard long intakes?

jonbarrett said:
I had it on a rolling road last year and it showed 388bhp.

jonbarrett

Original Poster:

800 posts

232 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
Yep, long intakes.

PaulK

319 posts

304 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
With 388BHP I would say its a 4.5 or a very and I mean very good 4.2

Flashheart

581 posts

272 months

Monday 1st June 2009
quotequote all
I seem to remember thinking the same when I bought mine 6 years ago. I contacted DVLA who said that they were only registered by TVR as 4.2's and not 4.5's.

When you consider all of the other corners they cut it is hardly surprising!

ridds

8,372 posts

274 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
It'll be a 4.5.

There are many 4.5's that have 4.2 on the log book and 4200 engine numbers.

Blame TVR, probably some dodgy or lack of correct paperwork when the 4.5 was first released meant they had to say they were 4.2's.

Mine is like this, 4185cc on the log book.

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
ridds said:
It'll be a 4.5.

There are many 4.5's that have 4.2 on the log book and 4200 engine numbers.

Blame TVR, probably some dodgy or lack of correct paperwork when the 4.5 was first released meant they had to say they were 4.2's.

Mine is like this, 4185cc on the log book.
Well I have a 4.2 which says 4.2 on the log book, but has a 4500 engine number confused

Storer

5,024 posts

245 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
My December 97 is the same. $.5 on the back, 4.5 induction and 4.5 brakes but 4.2 on chassis and block.

I have a letter to the DVLA in the file from TVR that states it is a 4.5 and not a 4.2 but the log book still says 4.2.

QuiteQuietCerb

995 posts

253 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
mine says 4.5 everywhere, but the engine number is 4200.... when i had the engine rebiult i was asured its a 4.5

plumAJP

1,149 posts

219 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
I think mine is a 4.2 it looks completley different to the 4.5's with the induction layout etc, but how would i stop any curiosity?

what can I check or post on here to confirm what engine size I have , or how would I know if it had any 4.5 parts in it like the crank(other than pulling it apart again)

I have not got any history relating to a 4.5 rebuild or replaced crank etc, I am trying to contact one of the previous owners of the car that rebuilt the engine sometime ago and changed alot of bits like later cams, bell housing mod, new clutch etc etc, to find out if he has missed anything from the history or can inform me of any unknown stuff.

mikeinsheffield

1,038 posts

215 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2009
quotequote all
One of the best bets would be to stick it on a dyno and see what it's punting out - but it's NOT just about the top line figure of bhp...... the 4.5 should have a fatter torque curve in the mid range.

I've got an 02 4.2, put it on Joo's dyno really out of curiosity and also as a diagnostic to see if it was running OK.... was gutted with about 268 bhp, after replacing the air filter and a few runs it made just over 300bhp; then after replacing the rattling collapsing cats it made 370bhp - which would make mine a strong 4.2 (it's got new cats, and sports back box).

As you can imagine - it felt a lot stronger! (noticed this before had the final dyno run to confirm power).

Well reported that 4.2's had a decent map from standard, but 4.5's need some mapping to release full power potential - however, you should still be able to tell by the midrange - 4.5's should be stronger there.

I'd recommend getting a dyno run as a general health check anyway - helped me find an extra 100bhp!!!! Gotta be the cheapest 100 bhp gain anywhere?? wink

Mr.Cerbera

5,151 posts

260 months

Thursday 4th June 2009
quotequote all
Hmmmmm, am I missing something here ? confused

You could go and book an RR session but you could, if you were pushed for time, always lift the bonnet !

The 4.2 motor has two visible fuel rails whilst the 4.5 has one, central one (hidden under the original, long, purple air intake tubes).

smile



Edited by Mr.Cerbera on Thursday 4th June 10:28

fatjon

2,299 posts

243 months

Thursday 4th June 2009
quotequote all
A 4.2 inlet system and fuel rails means nothing. Many later 4.2s were 4.5s as the blocks are all the same, all that was changed was the liners which were slightly bigger on a 4.5. I have it on very good authority that there are no very late 4.2s as TVR saw no point in having 2 sets of pistons and liners made when they could use one size and just badge engineer the cars.
So what it says on the block/logbook/anywhere else is meaningless. The only way to tell is head off and measure the bore. Although a figure of 388BHP is a fair clue that it's not a 4.2 engine.
I wouldn't worry about the insurance questions it raises, TVR obviously didn't. What insurance company is going to go to the trouble and expense of stripping a very expensive engine to find 300cc of extra capacity which would not have affected their premium anyway. Insurance is based on good faith anyway and you tell them what it should be and what you believe it to be in good faith.