LAMBORGHINI 400 GT 2+2 RHD at Tom Hartleys
LAMBORGHINI 400 GT 2+2 RHD at Tom Hartleys
Author
Discussion

Streetrod

Original Poster:

6,480 posts

227 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
Yes I know Tom Hartley's have had a lot of stick on here, I myself have not been overly impressed when I last spoke to them, but I have to say their recent move into buying and selling classics is producing some very nice cars, and here is a classic(sic) example.

I not sure what the general consensus on the LAMBORGHINI 400 GT 2+2 is on this forum but I love them and this example looks absolutely perfect. If I had the spare cash I would snap it up. What do others think?

http://www.tomhartley.com/usedcar//LAMBORGHINI/Mid...

bromers2

1,867 posts

271 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
Stunning. Know nothing about them - how much do you think that's worth ?

Streetrod

Original Poster:

6,480 posts

227 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
I did a quick search on auction sales over the last couple of years and it appears decent cars have sold for about £170k on average which sounds reasonable to me.

M3John

5,974 posts

240 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
Oh my, now that is gorgeous.

Robert W

550 posts

183 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
Hmm. I'm told that this car was supplied new to Paul McCartney before being owned by someone for 30 years. Odd that this isn't mentioned by Tom Hartley - so is this incorrect? What a gorgeous car.

Ianv12

10,787 posts

179 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
coyft said:
Anyone know the price? Annoys me all this POA.
agreed - if they can quote a Veyron at £745k, why the cloak and dagger about the other 3 cars at POA

Bluebottle911

813 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
Ianv12 said:
coyft said:
Anyone know the price? Annoys me all this POA.
agreed - if they can quote a Veyron at £745k, why the cloak and dagger about the other 3 cars at POA
Yes, it is one of the most irritating things about the motor trade. There should be a law against it!

The car is indeed drop dead gorgeous.smile

Try5t

722 posts

229 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
Bluebottle911 said:
Yes, it is one of the most irritating things about the motor trade. There should be a law against it!

The car is indeed drop dead gorgeous.smile
£275k on autotrader ......

graemel

7,197 posts

238 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
coyft said:
Anyone know the price? Annoys me all this POA.
Agreed. But as explained to me. If the car is on SOR you may not wish the owner to know the price that you are marketing their car for.

_Nathan_

505 posts

269 months

Wednesday 27th March 2013
quotequote all
Didn't these used to be £90k recently ?

Karl911

205 posts

173 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
A red one for £157K. Not as nice as the Grey and LHD.
http://www.jamesedition.com/cars/lamborghini/400gt...

johnnyreggae

3,117 posts

181 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Robert W said:
Hmm. I'm told that this car was supplied new to Paul McCartney before being owned by someone for 30 years. Odd that this isn't mentioned by Tom Hartley - so is this incorrect? What a gorgeous car.
Wrong plate wrong colour wrong car it would appear http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/columnists/nei...

Streetrod

Original Poster:

6,480 posts

227 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Try5t said:
Bluebottle911 said:
Yes, it is one of the most irritating things about the motor trade. There should be a law against it!

The car is indeed drop dead gorgeous.smile
£275k on autotrader ......
Well that would make it the most expensive 400 GT that has hit the market so far in the world.....

Try5t

722 posts

229 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
Streetrod said:
Well that would make it the most expensive 400 GT that has hit the market so far in the world.....
It's in the right dealer then !!

Robert W

550 posts

183 months

Thursday 28th March 2013
quotequote all
johnnyreggae said:
Robert W said:
Hmm. I'm told that this car was supplied new to Paul McCartney before being owned by someone for 30 years. Odd that this isn't mentioned by Tom Hartley - so is this incorrect? What a gorgeous car.
Wrong plate wrong colour wrong car it would appear http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/columnists/nei...
Duh - most things wrong then :-)

Bizzarini

757 posts

288 months

Tuesday 12th August 2014
quotequote all
Just seen this post
I owned this 400GT in 1978.
Bark find (sorta) £5000
Solf it to Nicholas Portway in Suffolk £6000
He did inded own it for 30 years

Ferruccio

1,886 posts

140 months

Tuesday 12th August 2014
quotequote all
I did think about getting this car - given what prices have done since, not buying it was probably a mistake.
But it seemed very over restored , which is not to everyone's taste.

As regards Paul McCartmey, Del Hopkins told me years ago that he'd never had a 400GT, as the Pullicinos were selling one with the same claim. He'd had an Espada. Del also said that none of these were original RHD, they'd all been converted subsequently.

Beautiful cars; and the kids can come too.......

FalconWood

1,371 posts

218 months

Tuesday 12th August 2014
quotequote all
coyft said:
Anyone know the price? Annoys me all this POA.
+1 on POA - I see these cars and never chase them s as I cannot see why thesellers cannot just put the price on the advert. I am told it is to only attract real buyers but I have bought enough to dispel that s%@t!!

Adam B

29,409 posts

275 months

Wednesday 13th August 2014
quotequote all
graemel said:
Agreed. But as explained to me. If the car is on SOR you may not wish the owner to know the price that you are marketing their car for.
Why not? I thought most SOR is on a fixed fee basis, and surely as the owner you would want to know the price it will be marketed at and so if it will take longer to sell than average.

Unless the garage wants to lie to you and pocket the difference

DevonPaul

1,576 posts

158 months

Wednesday 13th August 2014
quotequote all
FalconWood said:
+1 on POA - I see these cars and never chase them s as I cannot see why the sellers cannot just put the price on the advert. I am told it is to only attract real buyers but I have bought enough to dispel that s%@t!!
+2 I was looking at 1960s classics a couple of years ago and didn't bother with several as I thought I couldn't have afforded them. As it happens, I was probably wrong. The one dealer I did phone (based on the way into Hendon) never bothered to call back anyway, which might not have been a bad thing.

They always used to say "if you have to ask, you can't afford it", however I think "If you have to ask, they're taking the p155" is possibly more appropriate these days.