The Madness of the ULEZ charges
The Madness of the ULEZ charges
Author
Discussion

carspath

Original Poster:

909 posts

197 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
A random selection :

1) Merc CLS 320CDi 2008 -- Fail
2) Mazda Series 1 1597cc 1993 -- Fail
3) Countach 5000QV 5167cc 1988 -- Fail

4) 981 Boxster S 3496cc 2016 -- Pass
5) X -BOW R 1998cc 2012 -- Pass
6) Murcielago 2005 6197cc -- Pass


1 & 2 are almost teetotal , and 3 is surprisingly frugal , sipping fuel in a gentile manner ( unless opened up when the gauge falls before your eyes )

5 likes a drink alright (surprising) , and 6 is perpetually drunken , even at a gentle cruise .

3 and 6 share the same engine block , albeit one is fuel injected and catalysed , and the other is not .

Ferruccio

1,884 posts

139 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
Only way to deal with this stuff is at the ballot box.

anonymous-user

74 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
It's pretty obvious that many career politicians are crap at making sound decisions.

Where's that Guy Fawkes bloke ?


isaldiri

22,955 posts

188 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
Sigh. The ulez isn't about co2 or mpg but the other crap being put out. That's why any petrol car that is euro4 is going to pass. From some of the posts about it it almost seems some people actually want V12 cars like a F12 or Aventador to be banned rather than being pleased (as I assume most petrolheads would be) they are exempt....

Engelberger

509 posts

87 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
Ferruccio said:
Only way to deal with this stuff is at the ballot box.
This is a fallacy. We do not have functioning democracy. What party is standing on a "more pollution" ticket?

The other fallacy is that removing ourselves from the EU will have a positive impact on reducing legislation and regulation. It won't.

Sadly, this good idea will mean that some superb cars will become museum pieces. The death of classic ICE cars won't be electric cars taking over, it will be environmental controls being imposed. Nothing we can do to stop it either as it is a noble cause. The main issue is that from an environmental impact perspective we are just shifting the problem. Yes my Golf, being an older model, pollutes more than new car. However, I only drive 6,000 miles a year in it. My impact will be lower than someone driving 20,000 a year in a new Golf.

Ideally we would have a pence per mile charge but that has many pitfalls as well.

Hoofy

79,122 posts

302 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
Engelberger said:
Ferruccio said:
Only way to deal with this stuff is at the ballot box.
This is a fallacy. We do not have functioning democracy.
I guess in a truly functioning democracy, we'd have half the country run by the Green Party and the other half by UKIP.

Ferruccio

1,884 posts

139 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
Engelberger said:
Ferruccio said:
Only way to deal with this stuff is at the ballot box.
This is a fallacy. We do not have functioning democracy.
So where I live in London the local council decided to change the time that the yellow lines were operative from 9.30am to 8.30am.
Why?
Because they hate the mothers (mostly) who drive their kids the short distance to their (mostly) fee paying schools.
This really p/ssed the mothers off.
At the next local election, for the first time in a long time, the councillor changed. Then we went back to 9.30am.

I hope ULEZ, especially when it expands to cover much of London, will be Khan’s poll tax moment.

markj113

176 posts

195 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
just checked my two cars out of curiosity.

Porsche 996 C4 - subject to charge
Lamborghini Lp560-4 Spyder - Free

bonkers lol

Jack-flash

172 posts

92 months

Saturday 20th April 2019
quotequote all
Most vehicles which are not compliant will have to pay £12.50 for entering the area each day, in addition to the congestion charge.
Vehicles can be checked using TfL's online checker but broadly speaking, those which are non-compliant are:
Motorbikes that do not meet Euro 3 standards (pre-2007 vehicles)
Petrol cars and vans that do not meet Euro 4 standards (vehicles pre-2006)
Diesel cars and vans that do not meet Euro 6 standards (vehicles pre-2015)
Buses, coaches and lorries will need to meet or exceed the Euro 6 standards or pay £100 a day
Anybody who does not pay the charge will face a fine of £160, although a first offence may result in only a warning letter.

When you look at for instance 2005 Corsa 1.0 which fails to a 2009 Ferrari 599gto v12 6 litre which is ok makes the whole thing kinda stupid

Angelis

2,333 posts

256 months

Saturday 20th April 2019
quotequote all
2003 Ferrari 360 Spider is exempt


SRBA

134 posts

115 months

Saturday 20th April 2019
quotequote all
2005 Ferrari F430:


No ULEZ charge due for this vehicle
This vehicle meets the emission standards for ULEZ so you don't have to pay this charge when driving within the zone.

PGNSagaris

3,038 posts

186 months

Saturday 20th April 2019
quotequote all
ULEZ is largely a surveillance thing.

Anyway, I bought a 51 year old car that I look forward to driving extensively into London at the weekends for brunch en famille.

Allandwf

1,768 posts

215 months

Saturday 20th April 2019
quotequote all
I had too google it and see what it was wink

Far Cough

2,459 posts

188 months

Saturday 20th April 2019
quotequote all
ULEZ - dont make me laugh. If it was truly that then why oh why would they allow those foul smelling smoke belching black taxis ?

alephnull

359 posts

195 months

Saturday 20th April 2019
quotequote all
2000 reg Ferrari 360 not exempt

2003 Ferrari 360 exempt

Any idea why? Same engine?

ClaphamGT3

11,910 posts

263 months

Sunday 21st April 2019
quotequote all
Jack-flash said:
Most vehicles which are not compliant will have to pay £12.50 for entering the area each day, in addition to the congestion charge.
Vehicles can be checked using TfL's online checker but broadly speaking, those which are non-compliant are:
Motorbikes that do not meet Euro 3 standards (pre-2007 vehicles)
Petrol cars and vans that do not meet Euro 4 standards (vehicles pre-2006)
Diesel cars and vans that do not meet Euro 6 standards (vehicles pre-2015)
Buses, coaches and lorries will need to meet or exceed the Euro 6 standards or pay £100 a day
Anybody who does not pay the charge will face a fine of £160, although a first offence may result in only a warning letter.

When you look at for instance 2005 Corsa 1.0 which fails to a 2009 Ferrari 599gto v12 6 litre which is ok makes the whole thing kinda stupid
With the blanket Euro 3 thing for motorbikes, if you can get a certificate of conformity for an older bike that shows the emissions are ULEZ compliant, you can get an exemption from TfL

Larry5.2

496 posts

128 months

Monday 22nd April 2019
quotequote all
How many Ferrari exhausts is a moorland or californian fire equivalent to? Or is ULEZ p155ing in the wind...?

hunter 66

4,190 posts

240 months

Monday 22nd April 2019
quotequote all
Agree but more about city living , and we do not get many moorland fires in London .... PS I love burning Hydro carbons

Blib

46,843 posts

217 months

Monday 22nd April 2019
quotequote all
PGNSagaris said:
ULEZ is largely a surveillance thing.

Anyway, I bought a 51 year old car that I look forward to driving extensively into London at the weekends for brunch en famille.
AIUI, the ULEZ is 24/7.

PGNSagaris

3,038 posts

186 months

Tuesday 23rd April 2019
quotequote all
Indeed. hence why weekend brunching in the SE means no CC and no ULEZ