Simon's Murci on WRC Dyno
Simon's Murci on WRC Dyno
Author
Discussion

CUE99T

Original Poster:

1,021 posts

233 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all

BossCerbera

8,188 posts

268 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
It looks like it's trying to blow out the back wall of the dyno cell! rofl

Just a thought about the car not running 4WD on the dyno (and a question for those that know).... I thought the Lamborghini VT system, as used on the Diablo VT and Murcielago, is basically RWD most of the time. If the system senses traction problems at the rear, up to 30% of power moves to the front. Is this the case? If it is it would explain why Simon's car only drove the rear wheel rollers and would also suggest there's nothing wrong with the car at all. I'd be interested to know more about the Lamborghini VT system.

Also, my understanding (maybe I've only listened to the wrong people!) is that Gallardo's 4WD system behaves more like Audi's quattro systems - ie the Gallardo is a 4WD car that is able to direct power between axles/wheels to optimise traction.

Anyone care to confirm or otherwise?

bromers2

1,867 posts

275 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Si - how much BHP ?

Did you see the back wall shaking ???

Rick

autofocus

3,174 posts

243 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Paul,

Absolutely superb, missed Simons car on the Dyno as I was still inside the track at the time. Loving the videos you have posted so far, hope you get round to posting the footage of the convoy on the way to Silverstone.

Regards

Tim

Mosi

2,040 posts

240 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
The last dyno day I attended at WRC Tech ran a 2003 Murci, and that ran all 4 wheels up whilst on the rollers - so Simon's car is different to that one. Very strange


Edited by Mosi on Friday 16th March 19:37

CUE99T

Original Poster:

1,021 posts

233 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
There is clearly differences in alot of the model years, as Simons scoops go up on-demand when he presses the button on the console upto 40mph whereas mine drop as soon as you move off or turn the engine off!!


Edited by CUE99T on Friday 16th March 19:44

dealmaker

2,215 posts

279 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
CUE99T said:
There is clearly differences in alot of the model years, as Simons scoops go up on-demand when he presses the button on the console upto 40mph whereas mine drop as soon as you move off or turn the engine off!!


Edited by CUE99T on Friday 16th March 19:44


Mine are the same! Strange!

CUE99T

Original Poster:

1,021 posts

233 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
dealmaker said:


Mine are the same! Strange!


What age/model is yours?

(mine is a Dec'02 reg car)

dealmaker

2,215 posts

279 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
BossCerbera said:
It looks like it's trying to blow out the back wall of the dyno cell! rofl

Just a thought about the car not running 4WD on the dyno (and a question for those that know).... I thought the Lamborghini VT system, as used on the Diablo VT and Murcielago, is basically RWD most of the time. If the system senses traction problems at the rear, up to 30% of power moves to the front. Is this the case? If it is it would explain why Simon's car only drove the rear wheel rollers and would also suggest there's nothing wrong with the car at all. I'd be interested to know more about the Lamborghini VT system.

Also, my understanding (maybe I've only listened to the wrong people!) is that Gallardo's 4WD system behaves more like Audi's quattro systems - ie the Gallardo is a 4WD car that is able to direct power between axles/wheels to optimise traction.

Anyone care to confirm or otherwise?


Not sure about the exact engineering details or how the torque is split - but the only time I ever "feel" the four wheel drive coming in is at lowish speeds pulling out of 90 degree junctions.

BossCerbera

8,188 posts

268 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
dealmaker said:
Not sure about the exact engineering details or how the torque is split - but the only time I ever "feel" the four wheel drive coming in is at lowish speeds pulling out of 90 degree junctions.

Darren - did you get any further in your Espada hunt? I got told about a very nice, very original Series II recently. Apparently a proper car, timewarp condition.

dealmaker

2,215 posts

279 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
BossCerbera said:
dealmaker said:
Not sure about the exact engineering details or how the torque is split - but the only time I ever "feel" the four wheel drive coming in is at lowish speeds pulling out of 90 degree junctions.

Darren - did you get any further in your Espada hunt? I got told about a very nice, very original Series II recently. Apparently a proper car, timewarp condition.


Phil,

Gave up after the debacle of the black one! (wonder what happened to it?)

I've been thinking of an Interceptor instead.

Let me know the score on the Series II.

godzilla

2,034 posts

274 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
bromers2 said:
Si - how much BHP ?



Wot he said. ^^

No point in posting a dyno vid without revealing the recorded bhp...

Jonny5

3,526 posts

299 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all

Until Simon irons out if the front tyres should have been spinning, publishing the figure wouldn't be appropriate as do we know it's right either way ?

godzilla

2,034 posts

274 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
I see, furry muff.

Isn't the Murci still a viscous coupling? If so it should definitely still divert some torque to the front.
I presume all TC was switched off? That can sometimes have a funny effect on a rolling road, but the guys at WRC would know that.

simonspider

1,327 posts

274 months

Saturday 17th March 2007
quotequote all
No the traction control was on - never thought about that.. Its goung into Lambo Manchester so all will be revealed next week. Spoke to a Murcie owner today who said he had the same problem and it was simply a lack of oil in the front diff so maybe its that.
However I'm hoping that when it was 'in build' in the factory back in 2004 they decided to build a one off 2wd 'SV' and forgot to tell me mine was the one!

crikeymikey

1,093 posts

242 months

Monday 19th March 2007
quotequote all
Gallardo's system is essentially the same as the Murci's (Audi's system is very different, Phil).
Steady state torque split is 30/70 front to rear. At large throttle openings, and where grip is available, the maximum torque split is 18/82. So basically RWD, if you don't want to split hairs (or torque).
This means that Simon's car should have been turning it's front wheels on the dyno (as Andys car infact was).
I seem to recall a factory representative saying that in extreme circumstances, where only one wheel had grip, ALL the power would be shunted to that wheel. I fail to imagine a situation where a 500hp one wheel drive supercar would be a good thing for anyone! Perhaps the speaker had been at the Chianti that morning. laugh